this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
444 points (98.7% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

6002 readers
543 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. Use spoiler tags in comments, and NSFW checkbox for posts.
This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

YESSSSSSSSSSSSS

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] richieadler@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

Sell the cast and crew on 8-9 months of 16 hours shooting days when most of them have families. I dare you.

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 91 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Eight episodes every two years, I don't think so. That's not going to be something you necessarily pass on to your kids. And I think that's a loss.

That's pretty profound.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] negativenull@piefed.world 54 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think what gave earlier Trek so much soul was the non-human characters that allowed you to explore humanity through them. Spock, Data, Odo all lived in and around humans, and explored what that meant.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

I agree. It's what makes sci-fi good, in my opinion. It's a useful tool to look at the failings of humanity, but in a way that subverts people's self-defence mechanisms. For example, racist might agree treating intelligent aliens as animals is bad without thinking about themselves at first. With a tiny amount of reflection, they will realize it also applies to their beliefs. This can work for so many other topics, like DS9 covers the use of terrorism against Fascists using aliens as stand ins for actual groups that have and do exist in our world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I miss the more 'monster of the week' type storytelling weaved through with season long (or longer) arcs that spanned 20-ish episode seasons. I liked the kind of storytelling where episodes stood on their own but had hints in them that formed a big picture. And every now and then there was an episode that was wholly dedicated to the overarching plot.
This kind of storytelling leaves a lot of room for characterisation episodes or exploration of an intriguing concept. And don't you dare calling this filler. Filler is meaningless. Exploring concepts and characters is not meaningless.

[–] MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website 21 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I want more filler episodes the same way Magic The Gathering wants bad cards:

The solution to the aforementioned problem leads to the second reason “bad” cards exist. Different cards have different functions and appeal to different players.

We make some cards for the multi-player crowd. We make cards for the flavor crowd. We make cards for the silly crowd. We make the big creatures and spells for "Timmy." We make the combo cards for "Johnny." We take each different group of Magic players and throw some cards their way.

The problem is players tend to define “bad cards” as cards that they personally see no reason to play. But certain cards aren’t meant for them in the first place.

https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/making-magic/when-cards-go-bad-2002-01-28

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Somewhere out there, there's a single lonely soul who really, really gets Threshold.

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

I don't judge that person, but I'm not inviting him to join my DND group either.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Taco2112@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Everyone’s in here arguing and dissecting filler episodes and serialized seasons and I see a lot of good arguments on both sides. But, no one is mentioning a modern Trek series that did a mix of filler episodes and episodic ones, developed characters, and had full season arcs: Lower Decks

Granted, it’s a cartoon so it’s much easier for a deus ex machina or goofy cop-out ending but for 10ish 30 minutes episodes a season, they did a great job of telling modern stories while feeling like Trek Classic^TM^

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago (14 children)

while feeling like Trek ClassicTM

Because there was so, so much memberberries.
I found it mostly somewhar funny, but I don't know if I got half the jokes if I hadn't watched Old Trek so much.

[–] Taco2112@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I would argue that it was a good show even without all of that but the nostalgia made it more fun for sure. LD had great writers who told interesting stories. And, it could go from strange and campy to highbrow and serious from one scene to the next but they were also telling stories with through lines and arcs and still providing the filler.

To be fair, I haven’t watched Discovery or much Strange New Worlds yet, so I could be off base. But, it seems like Strange New Worlds is trying to thread that needle.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I agree. We only had 2 episodes to see Spock and La'an get together, it felt like whiplash when we just saw him pining over Chapel. Looking back at shows like DS9 a season of romantic build up meant 23-24 45-minute long episodes with random encounters, drama, things left unsaid - which made the finales that much more enjoyable.

Not to compare too much, but look at Jim and Pam's romance in the Office. Seasons 2 and 3 were long. It was meant to have us wanting the romance, to see every twist and turn. We had an entire episode for booze cruise, where we finally heard Jim admit it while seeing that they were obviously with the wrong people. We had entire episodes where there was reflection on just one moment of their relationship. You just can't get that in a half-"season" 4 episode arc.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think my favorite example is Brooklyn 99, and the Jake/Amy relationship.

First season introduces the idea (but really later on in the season that its apparent it could be more), season 2 is will they won't they until a kiss at the end, season 3 they start a relationship, season 4 finishes with them moving in together, season 5 gets a proposal and the wedding, etc.

They take time developing the relationship as an idea, but they don't do the silly "Oh no, misunderstandings made us break up again!" crap, just a progressing relationship over the course of the series.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

For real though. 8 or 10 episodes is nothing, especially when they're spread out intentionally to just keep people subscribed to a monthly streaming service.

TV shows of yesterday still matter largely because there is so. much. content. This shit was available for free with a basic ass television and some strips of metal wired into it. And you got 24 episodes a season. And sometimes there was more than one season in a year.

Artificial scarcity is obvious when things get that different.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Lots of talk of filler in this thread, and it certainly can be a problem, but there are reasons to watch things other than a serialized plot, and if it's good, it's not filler. Exploring themes and context and setting and characters are perfectly valid, and longer seasons let a show do that. I very much like having at least a few serialized threads running through a show, and characters that never, ever change can be a bit boring, but IMHO the term "filler" gets tossed around much too loosely in a lot of online discourse around genre TV.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

good filler episodes let you advance backstory of all the characters, which is something you may not have space for in the episodes advancing the main plot, so you do actually care about them.

not like strange new worlds (which i do like), where there is this asian woman pilot on the bridge and after 3 seasons i don't even remember her name. i mean wtf is with that?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

That’s a dumb comparison but I’m all for longer seasons. TNG had like 20 something episodes per. I’m even okay if they aren’t all JJ Abrahms cinematic quality. Bring back cheap TV!

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats the problem with modern trek, that need to be "cinematic". Star Trek doesnt need it, it never did. Some of the best episodes were done on a shoe string budget. Like The Drumhead and Its only a paper moon for example. Its only a paper moon didnt even feature any of the main cast. Thats how good DS9s writing was. Even the side characters got the love from the writers.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Exactly. A lot of those episodes were like little stage plays. Imagine entertaining your audience with just a good story! Those were the days.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It's Brannon Braga, if you don't want to click through to the article.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Awesome!

Can we now also get rid of the lens flares the dumb pew pew, most of the CGI and action and just get back to well written show episodes where CGI is a lick of paint to make it pretty, not the soup you're eating?

I want TNG style trek, DS9, I want the Orville for star trek!

[–] richieadler@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

The damage JJ Abrams caused is immense, and having one of his disciples on the helm doesn't help things.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm not expecting a return to the old 26 episode seasons, but damn, 15 would be a nice middle ground that would give the season's story arc time to develop and breathe (if it even has one, which I don't think is always necessary, tbh).

10 feels too short.

Besides, it just makes sense, given their goal is to keep people subscribed year-round. If new episodes are only coming out for 2 months of the year, that makes their service a harder sell.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

As Ronald D Moore said you can do any genre in Star Trek having longer Seasons gives them more opportunity to have those different genres the shorter seasons and super serialized format taken to the extreme have stripped Away that Swing for the fences mentality that Star Trek once had. Does that mean sometimes you're going to have a bad episode every once in awhile yeah, but it also means that you're going to have great ones.

We all know the perfect balance between episodic and serialized television was Deep Space Nine. Because it had that perfect balance of you could do an episodic swing for the fences story or if you needed to tell a story over you know four or five episodes you could going the extreme one way or the other is always going to be a recipe for disaster.

[–] Humana@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

Given the purchase of Paramount by the Ellison family, I unfortunately think we are going to witness the eshitification of Trek in the coming decade 😢

Edit: meaning they will want to remove the "wokeness"

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] thal3s@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For everyone saying this can’t be done anymore, etc. etc. I’d like to introduce you to The Pitt.

They just made fifteen (15!) one-hour episodes with no filler and they will have another 15 ready to show in January - a turnaround time of under 12 months.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Deep space nine type gray areas are a must. Give me a spock by the pale moonlight episode.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Maybe they could get back to writing more stories about an object oriented universe instead of only writing about the ego oriented universe. Every single star trek franchise since enterprise is a space soap opera.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So long as it doesn't mean adding filler episodes where any changes to the established situation get undone in the last five minutes, yes.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This guy stinks, but I agree that Trek is better with more episodes per season. Bring in more guest writers, and do cheaper episodes. Try weird stuff! Some of the best episodes are just are just two guys, sometimes one's an alien, talking in front of a camera

[–] oppy1984 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The seasons, when they were longer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›