this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
228 points (81.8% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8073 readers
36 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe it’s the retro-futuristic style or reminiscent of sci-fi and cyperpunk, but I genuinely really like the design.

I would never buy one due to the MYRIAD issues plaguing the stainless steel body, interior build quality, or give Tesla money. But still a cool looking car, if nonfunctional truck.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aedelred@lemmy.world 163 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Upvote because that truly is an unpopular opinion from what I’ve seen and I think they make the Pontiac Aztec look classy.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

They make PT Cruisers look like a sick ride.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

you're pushing it, probably because it broke down

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] bruhbeans@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

I would not touch a cyberdump with a pole, but I would drive the shit out of an Aztek

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, you’re using the community for its intended purpose.

[–] alt_xa_23@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

An unpopular opinion? In my unpopular opinion community?

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

Meanwhile, in actual Cyberpunk media. I disagree with you so hard that I deeply regret I only have one upvote to give. Well done.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 8 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Nice. It's certainly a step in the right direction.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flatplutosociety@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What I really want is this Cadillac electric concept vehicle that is like the car of a rich Shadowrun villain who has a sexy, mute personal assistant who is also a cyborg ninja assassin.A futuristic looking rust orange electric Cadillac

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 7 points 1 month ago

I respect and admire your priorities - and your awareness of Shadowrun. Clearly, you're a person of culture.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Have you seen one in person? They look... Not great in pictures, but like... Passable as a curiosity. In person? Monstrous and ugly as fuck. Also the bare steel is just a horrible choice.

[–] flatplutosociety@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Agreed. I like the concept of the design, because I dig a cyberpunk aesthetic and I just appreciate a big, bold swing at something new on principle.

But wow do they ever look like ass in reality.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Nah.

It is too simplistic.

Too low poly.

Unrefined.

Too anti-functional.

Almost like some ketamine addict drew it on a napkin and then stuttered 'M - Mm - Make it like, lo- look like this' to some unpaid intern.

It is, imo, an idiot's take on retro future as a style guide.

........

in contrast, we have....

DeLorean.

This Hyundai N Vision 74 concept car.

The modular Slate E Truck.

Those are retro future, look better (imo), and also ... the DeLorean both actually exists, and also actually works, and the Slate truck seems to have at least a decent shot at actually existing.

EDIT: Whoops, I was out of date with my info, looks like the Hyundai N 74 also will actually be produced.

Notice how these look like they could actually maybe be in the background of a shot from the OG Blade Runner, or Akira, or OG Ghost in the Shell... or would not look very out of place in Cyberpunk 2077?

......

All that being said, I do want to join the chorus of people saying this is a great topic for unpopular opinion, lol.

[–] TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks for showing me the Hyundai. That looks awesome!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

When the Cybertruck was revealed in 2019 the announced price was starting at $39,900.

The specifications were great.

Cyberpunk was about to be released.

Teslas were still pretty cool.

The Cybertruck looked like a giant Delorean electric truck.

Elon Musk had said some questionable things, but was still "Elon Musk" from Iron Man 2 and Star Trek: Discovery.

If the Cybertruck had actually been offered for sale in 2019 for $39,900, I would have bought one. Without hesitation.

In 2025 I wouldn't be caught dead in one because I don't want anything to do with the politics of Tesla and Elon Musk.

[–] TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nice, an unpopular opinion. Good on you.

It looks like the truck that a person who’s never used a truck would build.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

From some angles it looks cool, but from others it's not very well designed. When it was first unveiled I liked the boldness, but in the end even the design comes apart rather quickly.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago

Exactly. The aesthetic itself isn't the problem (although not at all what I would want my vehicle to look like), it's just really badly executed. Some features like the headlight bar looks cool from certain angles, but all the proportions just feel wrong, the silhouette is awful and it just looks so enormous and stupid in person.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Some of the original renders I saw were so much better…

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a saying in Brazil, "Everyone has their taste and asshole" (Gosto e cu, cada um tem o seu), because some people have a shit taste

[–] TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

We have a similar one in English.

“Opinions are like assholes; everybody has one and they usually stink.“

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)

Then go buy an 80s car with an actual good angular design and convert it to electric.

Some similar aesthetic options:

  • VW Scirocco or early Golf/Rabbit
  • Early Lotus Esprit
  • Delorean
  • Fiat X1
  • Triumph TR7
  • 80s Alfa Romeos
  • 80s Lancias (Beta, or Delta for instance)
  • anything from the late 60s to late 80s designed by Giorgetto Giugiaro

They are angular wedge designs, but done with care and thought to manufacturing, some safety (at least from sharp edges), and almost all of them are aesthetically pleasing.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Then go buy an 80s car with an actual good angular design and convert it to electric.

You say that like it's easy to do for anyone. 😅

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just curious if you've seen one in person or just online.

Cuz I didn't like how they looked online. But seeing them in person was just a whole another thing. I've seen a few, My personal opinion is the proportions are just off in every way. It's bigger than you'd think but also it looks like the cab is a lot smaller. It reminds me of toy vehicles you give like 5-year-olds. If it was just an RC car, I probably be fine with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I bet you like the St. Anger snare too, you absolute madman. Points for being unpopular.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's actually futuristic, which would be neat if Tesla's owner didn't think that the societies that cyberpunk works depict are something to strife for. Plus, that kind of edgy design is hostile to cyclists and pedestrians.

[–] Oka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All cars are hostile to pedestrians and cyclists

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

True, but it still makes a big difference whether the car is deadly at 30 km/h or already at 15 km/h.

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

~~It's also hostile to all other cars. The lack of crumple zone makes it a hazard to everyone and everything except the person in it.~~

Edit: I stand corrected, see below

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago

I will second this very unpopular opinion. I don’t quite like the Tesla truck but I like that fresh direction. I think with some minor tweaks it could look a lot cooler and still keep the polygon sci-fi vibe. If it wasn’t being killed I bet future versions of it could have been really neat.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you ever looked at one from behind? Goofiest, ugliest shit ever from the rear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rezad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

raccoons' reaction seeing a cybertruck:

[–] Xella@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I don't like the truck as a whole but the shape is peak Nintendo 64 and I love it. I wish it was a better vehicle so I could own one.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

At one point I really wanted to get a Delorean -- the angles, the materials, the doors, all very cool; plus BttF is a nice trilogy that reminds me of being a child. The cybertruck hits a lot of the same notes, so I can understand.

But, honestly, even my current car has too much central monitoring, data collection, and even control than I wanted. I really only bought it because my (the current) previous car was quickly dying.

I knew from Teslas claims and their other cars that there was just too much of that fiddly bullshit involved. So even without considering Elmu, a cybertruck was a clear No.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guess the Cyber Truck could be cool if it fit in with any of its potential surroundings. Everywhere it goes it just stands out like a sore thumb. There is no city or landscape that matches the aesthetic. It's like seeing a suped up F350 in the middle of NYC. Even if you like those giant trucks it will always look out of place in a big city. Or like seeing a Lamborghini way out on a dirt road in the boonies. It just wouldn't look right. I don't think there are currently any places that exist that match the aesthetic of a cyber truck. It makes me feel like when a high graphical game doesn't render an object correctly and it comes in low poly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It looks like garbage. In like every way. And I'm a car guy. It's not political. It's a big old pile of "not worth 120". I can buy two Toyotas with more satisfaction in style and performance.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago

I've heard dudes in maga hats say it's fugly.

So truly unpopular, have an orange arrow.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I think it looks decent with a white or black skin, I'm not really a fan of the silver look

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fair take, and well stated. Looks are subjective, so can’t really fault someone for liking the look of something I think looks overdone at best. Extra points for recognizing that it was clearly designed by someone who has never needed a truck for anything more than helping someone move or hauling expensive weekend toys.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would make a cool Hot Wheels diecast if the proportions were closer to a normal vehicle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 5 points 1 month ago

Agree on liking the retro-futuristic vibe!

Sure, it’s impractical for aerodynamics and problematic for crashes, but vibe wise I like it. At first, I thought it was bold that someone would look at an old sci-fi magazine and go for the aesthetic. But, you know, sci-fi cover art doesn’t need to deal with practical issues. While here, it really feels like they overlooked quite some other problems to sacrifice them to “the aesthetic”. I think one can still like the design while thinking it is a bad idea.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm a boomer when it comes to cars. I would rather have an old square body pickup than just about anything. I can rebuild a carburetor in my sleep. The systems are simple if not entirely mechanical. There is little if any extra plastic and a bad sensor won't stop it from functioning. A simple old school manual transmission. Wind up windows.

It's simple and I can work on it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›