this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
149 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

16693 readers
3187 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I stopped when one of them succeeded and reported it in my paper

[–] thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Simulation reveals possible miracle cancer curing drug could allow information to travel faster than the speed of light,

(in simulated mice)

[–] elvith@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And how many runs were bug free?

...one

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wouldn't all simulation have bugs, or all be bugs free. It's the same code you're running.

Maybe how many converged? One

[–] sga@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

probably the joke is that in simulations you have a lot of parameters, so even though code is same, not all of them would result in physically realistic situations. or your params were so bad that you ran out of memory or processes killed your system or shit, so even convergence bit works.

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And I saw none that the simulation succeeded.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Monte Carlo simulations aren't effective for everything, y'know. It has limits!