thebardingreen

joined 2 years ago
[–] thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Why is feeding people political? What value add is forcing people to starve? Monsters.

I've been doing some free consulting work with Food Not Bombs chapters in my local area. The same day that SNAP went away, ICE started intimidating them.

  • They told all the churches and community centers where they do distribution that they're "providing material aid to illegal immigrants" and can face criminal investigations and warrantless searches unless they stop letting FNB distribute food.
  • Have shown up at distributions to check people's immigration status which has scared some people away from coming to get food.

IDK if this is a nationwide coordinated effort or unique to my area.

I thought she said she yesterday that she didn't mean subsidies when she was talking about government backstop.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/06/openai-cfo-sarah-friar-says-company-is-not-seeking-government-backstop.html

What is it when you accidentally say the thing you weren't supposed to, then say you didn't mean it, but then immediately try to do the thing you said you weren't gonna do after you said you were?

[–] thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The Democrats lose because people with power and money make sure they can never run the people who would actually represent their base. "We can't get young people to vote." That's because of the candidates you're running, not because young people don't want to vote. And we know, we can tell, you would never in a million years run candidates young people would vote for, because that's not and never has been who you are or what you want. You would rather lose to insane criminals than allow the kind of change your base wants to actually have a chance of happening. Fuck you.

Nah nah nah nah nah. Nah nah nah nah nah. Hey hey hey...

Agreed. I had a consulting gig once, actually doing cyber security for Meta. They made us take an automated training, part of which was listening to videos of Mark Zuckerberg talking unironically about how important privacy is to the culture of Meta. The thing is, they had no good mechanism for making sure you actually watched the video. You could just mute Mark and then keep an eye on the run time, because at the end there would be a quiz. Most of the quiz questions were super stupid intuitive like "A friend asks you to use your Meta access to do X to their profile for them, what should you do?" And then multiple choice, with a bunch of obvious bad answers like "Like just do it, it's fine."

The only reason I don't own a firearm is I have a loved one in the house with suicidal ideation. Broadly, I agree with you.

If you're wondering how it is that I sing three part harmony...

[–] thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oddly reminiscent of Steven Universe. Is his own mother, who was some kind of (evil?) god, has an orb in his belly button, launches friendship based attacks.

I'm in this photo and I don't like it.

Companies attacking security researchers always goes so well for them.

[–] thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So good. Reminds me of this excellent scene of Kira laying down the truth on Gul Dukat.

 

I've been thinking about this amped up conservative rhetoric that liberals and leftists hate America. We all know that's BS. Right? Except it's not, and we should respond to it for what it is.

"I love an America I grew up in. I love an America I believe in, that I lived most of my life in. Now, the idea of America that you're fighting and "winning" for is killing that America I live in, that I love. So you're right. I hate what you imagine America to be... because it is trying to murder the America that I love. And I don't use the word "murder" lightly, and I apply it to you. And if that means to you that I hate America... then you're right! The America you believe in isn't lovable."

That's all.

 

“violence and murder are the tragic consequence of demonizing those with whom you disagree” Trump said unironically.

 

Linking to the r/denver megathread ONLY because it seems to be the best source of updates right now.

 

This is a really insightful and disturbing article.

Sobering thought: What are we supposed to do about 60 MILLION fucking people in this country who genuinely believe that Jesus is coming back any day to reign as an absolute monarch and punish the non-believers for their lack of faith and that this is a GOOD THING? No wonder democracy itself is crumbling. How are you supposed to have a functional democratic alliance with people who are praying every day for their literal god king to come reign over the earth and who eat up the bullshit of ANY and EVERY conman and grifter who feeds into that?

 

I'm just asking questions.

 

I know, he's always been one of those conservative old men writing for teenage boys. That's been true since the 80s. But his themes on a number of subjects got just enough more progressive as time went on, and I was able to stomach his writing. I always pegged him as a centerist who moved VERY GRADUALLY leftward over the decades and mostly wasn't interested in making political points in his books. Though he clearly had regressive opinions about women in the military for a long time, especially when that was a big part of the cultural zeitgeist in the 90s, those even eased in recent decades.

On the subject of abortion, he wrote an impressively nuanced short story back in the 90s about abortion and telepathy. Specifically, about a telepathic scientist caught between pro life and pro choice political blocks trying to use telepathy in an objective way to answer the question of how human fetuses were at different stages of development. While the results initially seemed to favor the pro life crowd, at the end it's revealed that the story is more about the observer effect and that rather than reading the minds of unborn children, he was reading his own mind reflected back to him by developing brains unable to process the telepathic contact.

So I was surprised by just how moralistic and aggressively pro life Judgement at Proteus (the latest installment of the Quadrail series) was.

A major plot point in the book is that a teenage girl, pregnant through SA, turns out to have a

warning! spoiler!gene modded fetus implanted in her by would be alien conquerors who arranged her assault as part of a program to make human beings susceptible to their mind control abilities.

At multiple points in the story, the health of the fetus comes up and multiple characters go out of their way to say things like "all sentient life is sacred." The main characters express agreement with this sentiment, even while bringing up that on some parts of Earth, it would be legal to abort the fetus. The aliens running the hospital space habitat they're on shut that down quite aggressively.

The girl herself, who is shitty and antisocial to everyone to the point that she loses believably as a character, is shown to want her rape baby to live (at least until the truth about it's conception is revealed) in a way that makes her even MORE unbelievable as a real person (I've done a lot of professional work in my life with teenagers and I just don't buy it).

But then when she DOES change her mind about wanting to keep the baby she risks her life

warning! spoiler!trying to abort by getting drunk to the point of life threatening alcohol poisoning.

This is the most believable part of the story (and where I threw the book down due to the toxic bullshit) because:

  • A teen girl nearly kills herself doing something dangerous because she doesn't think (with good reason) that the adults around her will support her in getting an abortion? 100% believable.

  • The main character initially thinks she's trying to kill herself and calls it "murder." When he figured out what she was actually trying to do, he puts it that "she wasn't the intended victim."

  • A female character, shown to be in a supportive role toward the girl, expresses she can't understand why. The male character mansplains to her "put yourself in her shoes, you might feel the same way!" And she passionately rejects that she would not. Yeah, a woman thinks about being a teen girl, pregnant through assault, discovering she's carrying an alien cuckoo baby, "doesn't understand why the girl would want to kill her child??" In fact, she needs a man to explain this to her? Bullshit! Also, r/menwritingwomen. Pro tip: Would have been MUCH more believable if you'd written the same dialog the other way around.

  • The male character then councils the woman that their job is to "be the girl's friend and help her understand how it's the fault of the people who did it to her and not the fault of her unborn child."

And that's the point where I threw the book down. And realized I'm probably done with yet another author teen me loved who adult me just sees more clearly.

But I worry for the teen boys who ARE still totally reading this author (and other military adventure scifi by conservative old men sneaking their political agenda into it). Given his association with Star Wars, he's STILL a pretty big draw for the teen boy demographic and his latest books are clearly still aimed straight at them, where these ideas can go percolate with all the toxic shit they absorb from the Man-o-Sphere on Tik Tok and Youtube.

Damn! Just had to get all that off my chest.

 

No spoilers for Season 2 other than the magic is back and go watch it.

It's so good it makes other Star Wars almost unwatchable by comparison.

I'm also really inspired to go fight some fascism and blast some ~~space~~ Nazis.

 

Title says it all. I'd like to host my own instead of sharing mine and everybody else's schedule with some techbros.

 
 
view more: next ›