this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
312 points (93.6% liked)

Science Memes

16474 readers
3055 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 64 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"So, did you ever have any plans to build that helicopter thing you drew?"

"Chi sei? Dove sono? Come sono arrivato qui?"

"Sorry, what?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 94 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Are they time traveling to see me, or am I time traveling to see them?

Because if it's the latter, Hawking on June 28, 2009.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Was that his famous time travel party?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago

Yes. Would be rude to turn down an invitation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] antsu@lemmy.wtf 105 points 6 days ago

Can I pick 2 and have them talk to each other instead? Would love to watch Hawking get Newton up to speed on some stuff.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 60 points 6 days ago (2 children)

None. I give my spot to someone who wouldn't waste it.

I can't speak on their level, and I'm okay with that. I've worked around some absolutely amazing geniuses in my career and I'm happy to be the worker bees in the arrangement. I'm no slouch, and I've done my own share of really cool stuff, but I wouldn't waste such an opportunity on me.

Give it to the Steve Baumels, the Tomas Bartas and the Jeff Linds of the world, the unsung bright spots in our tech march forward.

I'll save everyone a spot at lunch and try to get in on the group photo.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Einstein.

He was a generally great guy and had very progressive social views, so it would be fun to talk to him about the current state of the world.

Also a lot of his theories around relativity and theories of quantum physics have been proven recently. It would be amazing to see his mind be blown when he realises both sides were right and what that means for how a theory of everything needs to look like.

[–] parricc@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

To say he was a generally great guy really overlooks how awful he was to women. He was no doubt brilliant, but he had some very serious character flaws. And unfortunately, he had an echo chamber of peers and a rockstar celebrity status that only worked to reinforce his shitty behavior and backwards views. It's not super uncommon for brilliant people to be absolutely nightmares on a personal level. Imagine being an absolutely brilliant scientist that gets married only to be completely forbidden from science and the things you love, and then reduced to being a maid for a madman with tons of insanely particular demands.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 69 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To make it fair you should get extra time with hawking

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To ask him what he saw on the island

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Consent?

As if any of these people want to talk to ME for 3 hours?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

With Marie Curie but perhaps via zoom.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 54 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Edison. For 3 hours, in a padded room, where no-one can hear his screams.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The irony is at least three of these people would make you want to do this to them by the end while Edison was able to do what he did because he could hold a conversation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 61 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Tesla. I feel there's so much we don't know, let alone understand, about his ideas. Have we overly sane/crazy washed him?

[–] genau@europe.pub 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He was probably a bit crazy.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

True, but probably more interesting than Newton, who would just keep talking about god the whole time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cynar@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Apparently he didn't trust patents etc. He would come up with fanciful ideas, that sounded vaguely plausible, as cover for what he was actually working on.

At this point picking apart the Good, the bad and the cover is an ...interesting exercise.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Look what Edison did. I don't blame him for not trusting how the business world works.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Leonardo to blow his mind and maybe make a time paradox

Tesla to explain to him that he really needs to take some financial advice because it's not about him, it's about people using his techniques.

Edison to punch in the face repeatedly for an hour

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Alan Turing, the father of modern computer science. I'd also probably s his d because he's technically a dilf. 🫦

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 days ago

The answer is Feynman

[–] stelelor@lemmy.ca 28 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Feynman, mainly because he was an amazing professor and knows how to talk to people.

Einstein and Newton disliked people, so they would be terrible conversationslists outside their areas of expertise. I think that was true of Leonardo as well. Edison is also out because he was a dick.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 15 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Probably Einstein, because he seems like an interesting dude beyond his physics. He liked philosophy, for example, and is one of the examples that I invoke when I argue that university level science education should involve more philosophy — Einstein wasn't an anomaly in this respect, but a good symbol for discussing how the practice of scientists doing philosophy seems to have waned over the 20th century.

He was also pro-socialism, and had sensible takes about how science isn't a universal solution to stuff, but a specialised tool that is good for some problems but not for others.

Related: those who enjoy long video essays may enjoy this one from an awesome ex-astrophysicist: Einstein Was a Socialist; Should We Care? (1h16m)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Edison but instead of talking to him, I Rick Roll him for three hours.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Feynman, over a beer, at a strip club.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phx@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I'd go for Leonardo. The others - while I understand things at a basic level - I'd likely not be able to understand most of their fields.

Maybe Tesla but I'm not sure if the conversation would end up centered around some of the neat science stuff I could grasp or pigeons with laser-eyes ...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'd ask nikola tesla three times what he thinks about Tesla using his name for an inferior car that shouldn't even be a thing.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"This guy put my name on his shitty car company??"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I would need like a decade of prep to have any meaningful discussion with any of them 😅

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago

I'll take Richard Feynman for nine hours please.

[–] laz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 days ago

Feynman didn't even write his books

[–] HiobsTriops@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Hawking was probably way more familiar with the works, achievements and maybe even personal anecdotes of everyone in this post than I could ever hope to be. Thus, sitting down with him feels like the best deal.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago

Probably Edison but only to tell him how much of a fuckhead he will be remembered as.

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Marie Curie three times and Imma sit real close to her so I can check out early and miss a whole lot of what's currently going on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 6 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Really? Only one woman? Marie Curie is my choice

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

3h in a room with her might put you over your annual allowed radiation limit though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

Tesla or Curie I think

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

God, I literally cannot choose. That list is probably my perfect list of scientific figures in history. Aside from Edison, he can burn in hell.

The only ones I might add would be Goodenough and Gauss.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 22 points 6 days ago (8 children)

Davinci for sure because of the breadth of genius and imagination seems more approachable to a casual conversation, plus history has less on him.

Other's have so much depth in their fields that I wouldn't be able to converse intelligently on anything they are famous for. Having a chat with Feynman would be my second choice because his talks to laymen audiences are quite good.

A pint or five with either would be fun.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Bohr, for sure.
I've read Feynman's biography, which, for the record, I would not recommend to everyone.
But he's witnessed Einstein and all of these early physics luminaries, and by his memorable account, everybody was in awe of Bohr, and Bohr only.
So I'd like to hear what the ruckus was about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Feynman. Dude must have some crazy stories. Seriously, who cares about science?

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Why? He was relatively contemporary and lived a pretty normal life relative to most of us compared to the historical figures.

That and he was a mega sexist who made the lives of women in science much worse for literal decades.

https://youtu.be/TwKpj2ISQAc

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Tesla. From what I have heard, he was eccentric ( paranoid possibly? ) so it'd be fun to see if I could get him to think I'm some sort of government agent looking to stop him from doing what he does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 20 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I'd let DaVinci hit my vape

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago
[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago

Me: So why did you kill the elephant

Edison: AC bad

load more comments
view more: next ›