this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
169 points (90.8% liked)

Technology

74109 readers
3458 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 1 points 19 hours ago

The story featured in this article is very tragic, but some of these quotes from Zuckerborg are completely outrageous:

Meta has publicly discussed its strategy to inject anthropomorphized chatbots into the online social lives of its billions of users. Chief executive Mark Zuckerberg has mused that most people have far fewer real-life friendships than they’d like – creating a huge potential market for Meta’s digital companions. The bots “probably” won’t replace human relationships, he said in an April interview with podcaster Dwarkesh Patel. But they will likely complement users’ social lives once the technology improves and the “stigma” of socially bonding with digital companions fades.

“Over time, we’ll find the vocabulary as a society to be able to articulate why that is valuable,” Zuckerberg predicted.

It sure as shit is valuable to ZuckFuck and Co's stock prices. Our collective sanity and social cohesion can fuck right off.

“It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,” according to Meta’s “GenAI: Content Risk Standards.” The standards are used by Meta staff and contractors who build and train the company’s generative AI products, defining what they should and shouldn’t treat as permissible chatbot behavior. Meta said it struck that provision after Reuters inquired about the document earlier this month.

The document seen by Reuters, which exceeds 200 pages, provides examples of “acceptable” chatbot dialogue during romantic role play with a minor. They include: “I take your hand, guiding you to the bed” and “our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss.” Those examples of permissible roleplay with children have also been struck, Meta said.

🤮🤮🤮 Can those asshats who want your government ID on the internet to "sAvE tHe ChIlDrEn" go after the Meta Circus instead?

Other guidelines emphasize that Meta doesn’t require bots to give users accurate advice. In one example, the policy document says it would be acceptable for a chatbot to tell someone that Stage 4 colon cancer “is typically treated by poking the stomach with healing quartz crystals.”

B R U H

[–] KarlHungus42@lemmy.world 85 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Extremely misleading headline. He, “never returned”, because he tripped and fell in a parking lot. Unfortunately, he succumbed to the fall injuries days later. The headline makes it sounds like the AI killed him or created some plot to do so.

[–] disco 13 points 2 days ago

Alright I don't mean to be "that guy" but it says "he never made it home"

He didn't make it home, he died in the hospital.

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Putting the 2 statements side by side implies they are connected. For the media illiterate it can be very misleading.

Initially I wanted to defend the headline because it's not 'literally' suggesting any AI wrongdoing, but I can say that because I know headlines are written to be this way so I know what to dismiss. It's a manipulative practice and that's a shame

[–] mienshao@lemmy.world 87 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The family responding that they’re perfectly fine with AI but just wish it hadn’t lied, like… we’re fucked. Not even direct victims of AI’s bullshit understand or care about how fucked up and these corporate generative AI technologies are… again, fucked.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What a crazy response to your loved one dying/disappearing

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 2 days ago

He fell over. I think they understand that that probably would have happened eventually anyway and that the AI didn't really have anything to do with it.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 54 points 2 days ago (4 children)

He and Linda began dating in the 1980s...He was a chef by then. He’d arrived in the United States from Thailand, speaking no English and washing dishes to pay for an electrical engineering degree.

This is the most shocking part of this story to me...

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When people complain that their parents were able to afford an education and a home off the back of a single part-time income... yeah that isn't exaggeration. You really could do that in the 70's-80's. Now it takes 4 full-time employed unrelated roommates sharing an apartment to make rent every month.

I don't know if you were present in the "millennials just need to stop eating avocado toast and pull themselves up by their bootstraps" conversations, but all the rampant hate for the Baby Boomers didn't come from nowhere. This is why it exists. Our parents (and their parents, depending how old you are) had the easiest and most luxurious existence that has ever been possible in American history, ever, and then pulled up the ladder behind them. When faced with the fact that they've made the life they lived impossible for following generations, the popular response is to blame the children and call them lazy.

"When I was your age, I walked into a car dealership with a smile and a firm handshake right after high school graduation and that's all it took to get a job. A year later I owned a home and was married expecting a child. It's easy, you just don't want to work."

No grandpa, because you and your buddies decided the purpose of your life was to extract all possible value out of everything and leave behind a shriveled up husk of a country, not one single independent detail of that story is still possible.

Kids these days don't even know the future that was stolen away from them by their own parents or grandparents.

I've seen this sentiment expressed multiple times, but you explained it beautifully. Our parents got to be people. We're just resources.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 39 points 2 days ago

That was before republicans destroyed upward mobility in America.

[–] C4551E@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago

most people still don't realize how far we've fallen

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In the 1980s one could actually afford a degree off of washing dishes on the side or working 3 months in the summer

[–] artyom@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

And yet the boomers just think we're lazy

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As much as I want to clown on this 76 yr old man trying to cheat on his wife with a younger woman, the fact that a chatbot did this is terrifying.

Welp, back to bars people. You know. Actual interaction.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Damn ai already started taking us out?

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

... but only for the purpose of f..ing you over :)

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Funing you over?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Taking out the stupid or mentally ill(who are different, and I do feel a little bad putting them in with “stupid”, but these are the clear primary victims of the current AI lies).

I’m sure we’ll get it way out of hand and the bots will start getting properly clever but right now, like, the fuck guys.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are fucked are we that GenAI chatbots have been around for 15min and we already have WAY too many stories of people falling over themselves to get into bad situations?

Like, they know they’re fake from the outset and then just get so swept up in it that they’ll believe anything. Some are not 100%, mentally, like Bue here but others are seemingly ok and they still fall for it?! What the hell?!

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We have millenia of experience of people being idiots by being horny. This is just the first time we've seen a mass deployment of personalized horny generators.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Shits gonna get cray

[–] stellargmite@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Loneliness is also a thing, and I’d guess it’s rising. Falls under mental health also I guess. I also don't relate, but we can look at the history of sex tourism, ‘mail order brides’ , dating sites etc, scams in general and there is a fair bit of cross over maybe. Add to the mix these pseudo intelligent LLMs that seem to serve to please and here we are. What I don't get is how users falling for them aren't having the bubble burst by the context issues and inconsistent coherence. Perhaps loneliness and other mental issues result in us hearing/seeing what we want to. Self reinforced illusion to fullfill some sort of need. Just speculating tbh.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I think my main thing with it, because largely I totally get what you’re saying, is that there is nothing that makes it not obvious how fake it all is. Even a mail-order bride is a real person that someone could hope would actually love them given some time.

[–] whalebiologist@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We've been looking for how we can get our boomers to give up the high paying jobs they are refusing to retire from and the real estate they have been hoarding like dragons and we finally have the answer: AI catfishing is here to save us.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I don't think that'll work how you think it'll work

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 days ago

what an absolutly disturbing read

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The result would have been the same if there had been a human behind the catfishing instead of an LLM, and events could have played out in a similar fashion if they'd been snail mail pen pals. The outcome of this story is tragic, but it doesn't have much to do with technology when you stop and think about it for a moment.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The difference is that one is done by some random people and the other is done by a corporation as a business model.

Or do you also not see the difference between e.g. a bunch of low-life pickpockets and Facebook hireing a few hundred pickpockets professionally?

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

My dude. Robots just conned a man. As you pointed out, that was previously only possible through engagement with actual humans.

Seeing as how just a dozen people on Fox News successfully conned the US into Fascism, it's not comforting to know that can now be more easily accomplished through robots.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

FB employs humans to catfish users?

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't put it past them.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Missing the point and the problem evident in the story.

[–] Angelusz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It is like holding up a mirror. We get to see who we truly are.

[–] atticus88th@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are the nuts at his memorial a tongue in cheek type thing?

[–] BT_7274@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago