In all fairness, most countries didn't allow dual citizenship until the latter half of the 20th century (this year is the 50th anniversary of Canada allowing dual citizenship without restriction, according to Wikipedia). The revoke-one-to-get-another system used to be standard. Nor is China the only country that disallows dual citizenship—a lot of Asian countries don't, or restrict it. It's just that most of them handle the issue more cleanly (although India is starting to get pushy about the behaviour of their current and former citizens abroad in much the same way as China . . .)
nyan
Only if the money circulates back into the economy here rather than being tied up in some exec's offshore bank account. Plus, "higher" earners doesn't mean high earners—the burden will disproportionately end up falling on nominally middle-class people who don't have time to shop around.
Well, they're allowed to make laws about who can hold Chinese citizenship, so it's within their right to say that no citizen of another country can also be a citizen of China. However, the appropriate way of handling would-be dual citizens under those circumstances would be to strip anyone who obtains citizenship in another country of their Chinese citizenship, not play weird games where they ignore the foreign citizenship.
(I would consider it unsafe to go to China right now regardless of citizenship.)
We all know Betteridge's Law of Headlines, right?
Or do a little more research and find somewhere that the infrastructure was so trashed by war or natural disaster that some records are completely gone. Happened a lot in WWII, and it must have happened in other places since.
Three meetings, mostly informal, this time.
We could turn that into a drinking game.
If you use Windows, you agreed to the TOS.
If your employer is forcing it on you, chances are you never even saw the TOS.
It's a decades-old name. I believe the original idea was that the party would be socially progressive and fiscally conservative. The combination doesn't seem to work very well, though, because the two often pull in opposite directions, and when they do, it's always the "socially progressive" part that seems to get thrown under the bus.
"Tax relief" is one of the greatest lies ever made by politicians of any stripe. If they do manage to reduce taxes, they compensate by cutting some useful service rather than, say, their own salaries.
There is one other possibility. Poilievre has been an asshole to at least one other Conservative MP. Perhaps he did something to her behind the scenes that she decided she wasn't going to tolerate, and she crossed the floor as a form of revenge.
Either way, I doubt we're ever going to find out exactly what the carrot and/or stick was.
I didn't think this season was going to produce anything more batshit than Niwatori Fighter. Evidently I was wrong . . .
Jails don't hold only people waiting for trial, though—if I recall correctly, people serving short sentences may also be confined in a jail rather than a prison, so the jail space also needs to scale with population (we've been having issues with jail and prison overcrowding for a good quarter-century). Therefore, we need more jail space and more prison space and a better-funded, better-staffed court system that can hear cases in a timely manner, but yeah, the court system is the most important part.