this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
1033 points (99.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41483 readers
1478 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lack@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

That’s 247 billionaires we could have put in the buffet. Never trust a billionaire. Eat them at first opportunity.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

And I don't believe shit of it. I think all their "donations" to foundations and "charity" are tax scams. I've seen so many of these deeply immoral and greedy fucks do this and go on charity drives and I'm not buying any of it, I know these people are just scamming us somehow, they don't do anything out of the kindness of their hearts and betterment of society, it's all about money.

The worst part is- they are not the problem per se, the system is. The system creates this, capitalism creates this, it promotes these people to the top sure, but if not them then anybody else willing to sell their souls to the literal antichrist.

Capitalism is a malignant cancer and needs to be excised and chemod or we all die. DIE. Civilization GONE. Humanity GONE. Culture GONE.

It's us or capitalism.

[–] phillycodehound@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Can't say that I'm shocked.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These people are genuinely sick in the head, this level of pointless greed is not normal. Of course they aren't going through with it.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Exactly like gambling addicts. They are blinded by capitalism, because capitalism is nothing but gambling, and not only are these people addicts, the game has completely usurped society itself. Just think about it- what dictates our society? It's not our values, or ideals, our wishes and wants and dreams, it's the economy.

The Economy is a fucking golem that has overtaken democracy, we have no say, what The Economy wants always takes precedence, and the only thing The Economy wants is MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE. MORE people, MORE things, MORE money, MORE. You know what else does that? Cancer.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Exactly! And like cancer, it will eventually consume and destroy its host. It may take time, but it will.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Once you start to have money, you get a money dependency. No matter how rich you get, the "baseline you really need to live the life you want and nothing more" growths together with your wealth.

Take lottery winners and ask them if they could give away half of their gains. Will you be surprised if most of them say no, even though the day before they would have set their "minimum needed to live a happy life for the rest of my days" at a much smaller fraction of it?

Now take a similar population, but who in addition rationalized them deserving that money through their hard work and talent.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 81 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Financial obesity is literally capitalism. That's the disease. Period.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Financial obesity is a large part of capitalism, but it’s by no means exclusive to it. Replacing capitalism with anything that tolerates obscene wealth accumulation would be a categorical failure.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

I really like that as a term, never come across it before.

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

by followed up you mean: "Ok after I die, I will donate half of my money to my tax-exempt family-owned-and-operated charity, that just happened to only pay salaries and donations to causes that serve the interests of our family-owned-and-operated shell companies"... :D

it's like sequeezing your late's father dry-drenched cumsocket which he used his entire life, then drinking it, and brag about it... to which I say thanks but no fucking thanks.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

On an unrelated note, Bill Gates is in the epstein list.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

And he didn't donate shit without an economic incentive, it's all a tax writeoff, it's all a scam. Even that shit he did pumping money into AIDS research as "charity" went into companies where he held stake himself. It's so fucking vile.

guillotine.jpg

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago (4 children)

And the reason Melinda divorced him.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

They broke their arms patting themselves on their backs and can’t write checks anymore. 😢

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 200 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The prospect of still being billionaires, but with less billions, was just too much to handle

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly why they need to be taxed more.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 19 points 2 days ago

Billionaires shouldn't exist to begin with and don't assume tax money are used by governments for good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 107 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Now imagine if there was some way a government could take a percentage of that and put it towards improving society as a whole.

Oh well, guess we're fucked.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 13 points 2 days ago

BUT THAT WOULD BE COMMUNISM!!1!

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Now imagine if there was some way a government could take a percentage of that and put it towards improving society as a whole.

Yes, some form of "giving pledge" where the amount was standardized and there was no option to back out. Radical thinking here.

[–] xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago

Lmao fuck them my taxesare higher then half

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The fact that there are 256 billionaires is an absolute failure of our society.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

256 billionaires that we know of!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (13 children)

You don't understand, they're making money so much faster than they can reasonably give away.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

making money

I think you mean stealing money.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Not true.

They’re also using imaginary methods to make money grow out of other money.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Which then needs someone in the real economy to make goods and services to back up the value of that money.

They are basically printing UOM instead of IOU vouchers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I forget where I heard this story, but apparently Bill and Melinda were at a dinner party during the Obama Presidency. Bill said that he had "way more power than Obama" and Melinda kicked him under the table. TBF I think he was completely right: politicians in the US derive their power from their ability to raise money from rich donors, while rich donors derive their power directly from their money. And they continue to derive power from their money even when they deposit it into a "foundation" which doles it out tax-free to favored recipients.

In Gates' case, a lot of his "charity" involves donating patent-protected drugs to third world countries to forestall their saying "fuck your patents" and producing life-saving drugs for themselves. Preserving intellectual property rights is the primary goal here, with actually helping people secondary. Anyone who thinks these ruthless multi-billionaires suddenly become benign, caring people in their advanced years is a rube.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 103 points 3 days ago (21 children)

Lol... While gates foundation does do some decent work. Let's be real it is astroturf operation inherently

Also, Warren already back out.

So this is just a shill op for these "good" parasites.

Read between the lines folks, these people are your enemies

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (4 children)

why did they only use an 8-bit number to count billionaires , surely there are more of em

/dumbface

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 47 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Meh. I actually don't think its a good idea. You just draw power away from the best of a segment empowering the biggest assholes. Taxes should be progressive and include all sources of income not just wages and the tax brackets should go all the way up to the highest income level. So there should be a level for over 100 billion and another for over 10 billion and over 1 billion and so on. Five figure income should be zero.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] lowleveldata@lemmy.world 65 points 3 days ago (1 children)

tbh I'm surprised that there are 9 who did

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wowza scoob. Imagine that. Rich people lying.

Just wow.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

giving half their wealth to what? charities that they control for pushing agendas (and possibly money laundering if we are talking about billionaires in third world countries with much less regulations)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] panicnow@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Link to report instead of awful Fortune link: Giving Pledge

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It’s like a high score in a video games for them, nobody needs that much wealth

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›