it_depends_man

joined 2 years ago
[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

If I search “Iron” on wikipedia I’m looking for facts

Not what I meant.

The point is: there is an established group of editors, with established rules and preconceptions, an established interpretation on what good sources are and what a neutral perspective is and isn't, and there is no chance of changing those and that is why I have no interest in interacting with wikipedia in any constructive way.

I could talk about politics too, I picked video games because I know those articles are also bad.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

Yes.

Yet behind the celebrations, a troubling pattern has developed: The volunteer community that built this encyclopedia has lately rejected a key innovation designed to serve readers.

But not that one, because rejecting AI 1) is not a generational rejection and 2) it is correct to reject it.

What I think is or will be the generational problem: the community that maintains it and decides what is being accepted or rejected is an "in group" that it is impossible to break into with conflicting ideas. For example, I do think the gaming, game mechanics and game development related pages can be vastly improved. But I don't think the people responsible for those pages are interested in the changes I would suggest.

All the wikis for different games could just be on wikipedia. But they're not, probably because they were rejected, because it's "not relevant". Well, some people decided they were relevant after all and they made their own wikis for those. The outcome is tribalism based fragmentation, because of differences in opinion of who values what and what should be preserved and what shouldn't.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

There are patterns and tells.

I generally dislike the little random micro movements that bosses do too though. I loathe the 4 phase arena you have to do every time before the fight. Not my favorite fight.

But it's not random.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Please link to a source when you say things like that.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

If you work 10 hours a day and sleep 8, that's 6 hours left over for protesting. If 40 adults are going to a protest 2 can watch the kids. 2 1 can make soup for everyone. Same for transportation to and from protests.

You can make it work if you prioritize.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

But they so generously extended their ~~blackmail ultimatum date~~ support!! Why won't people switch? It's so weird. Don't they know that MS CEO Satya Nadela ($1.1 Bil) has their best interest at heart, always?

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Mit KI kannst du das Fördergeld deinem Kumpel geben, der auch keine Erfahrung mit dem Thema hat, weil KI ja für alle so neue Technik ist, da ist es halt schwer zu sagen wer da Ahnung hat (Spoiler, ist es nicht).

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This isn’t a rich dumbass like Trump. It’s always interesting to listen to him.

Noooobody cares where the model comes from once it's already trained and being run in a sandbox.

All he's trying to do here, is play for time to get people to stay invested in the US but move out of US businesses himself and into longer term assets like gold. He's playing the "panic" and "china bad" cards to do it. Don't believe him and divest. Do it before the US crashes.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is technically true, but

Install GNOME Software Flatpak plugin

The GNOME Software plugin makes it possible to install apps without needing the command line. To install, run:

sudo apt install gnome-software-plugin-flatpak

I hope you can see the problem with that.

It did read that page, it just didn't register because it's more command line stuff.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

The population of countries are not single minded monoliths.

The people fighting ICE now are largely the same people who have also been opposed to the US military doing the bad things they did.

Even or particularly, among members of the military and veterans, you have hardcore loyalists of course, but you also have plenty of people who join the military because it's their ticket to a little money and an education. They know it's bad, do it anyway, and while they do have a respect for their comrades, they also know fully well that what they did was wrong and that the military is treating veterans pretty badly.

So, there are people in the US, who ignored reality for a good while, and if and when they get hurt, I feel no sympathy.

But there are also plenty who have been opposing or trying to improve and reform the negative aspects of US society and culture their entire life, and when they get hurt, I do feel sympathy.

Some are still ignoring it. Prominently, former president Obama still behaves as if he's safe. Of course, I wish no harm on anyone. I do wonder if his approach is too hands off though and if it turns out it is, the best I will be able to say is "told you so".

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This is one of those intentionally misinterpreting posts that I really really... "dislike" in the linux community.

https://flathub.org/en

I guess you'll need to install gnome-software or Bazaar

~~...which the official instructions don't mention, so it's not a valid answer. Again, I can get it to work, but that's not the topic of this thread.~~

10
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by it_depends_man@lemmy.world to c/gamedev@programming.dev
 

Finde ich leider wieder symptomatisch.

Es ist außerordentlich schwierig an die eigentlichen Texte und Stellungnahmen und Positionen zu kommen, weil die Zeitungen sie nicht weitergeben, die Diskussionen oft hinter verschlossenen Türen stattfinden.

Die Vorschläge und Forderungen decken das ganze Feld ab, mehr Strafen, Waffengesetze, Änderungen im Grundgesetz, Änderungen im Umgang mit Asyl, Änderungen vom Umgang der Bundesländern untereinander.

Aber ich vermisse den tatsächlichen Bezug auf reale Probleme und reale Umstände. Ich glaube zum Beispiel nicht das selbst wenn es ein "Messerverbot" geben würde, das dann tatsächlich die Polizei überall Taschenkontrollen machen würde.

Selbst wenn die Forderung sinnvoll wäre, wäre sie nicht umsetzbar, ohne massive Veränderungen in der Finanzierung, dem Verhalten, der Personalpolitik etc..

Es ist nicht klar ob die Forderungen wenn man sie tatsächlich ausformuliert zu unseren Werten passt.

Es ist nicht klar, ob einige Konsequenzen der Forderung nicht sowieso schon die Probleme gelöst hätten. Und es ist unklar, weil nicht so richtig ehrlich mit den Daten und Fakten umgegangen wird wie es notwendig wäre.

Es ist ja sowieso eigentlich ständig Wahlkampf, aber ich finde diese Schwäche in der Argumentation wirklich besorgniserregend.

Es kann doch nicht sein, das wir bei jeglichem Thema ohne jede Bodenhaftung einfach irgendwas fordern, irgendwas tun und uns dann wundern wenn der bunte Mix an kontextlos getroffenen Entscheidungen nicht funktioniert?


Wie seht ihr das?

Habt ihr "gute" Quellen wo tatsächlich mal was drin steht wie machbar oder sinnvoll eine der Aktionen wäre?

Meinungen? Eindeutige, klar bessere Vorschläge die der Rest der Republik irgendwie nicht wahrnimmt?


Eigentlich ist es ein Rant über die niedrige Qualität der Diskussion "die man so sieht".

view more: next ›