this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
507 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

15762 readers
4405 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] princess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago

they might release the elusive third partyon

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's a centrist pipe dream, the morons accelerated them both to the right.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The Overton Window shift in the US is mostly due to persistent low primary attendance.

Congressional primaries have seen <15% attendance for the last 40 years. Retirees never miss a vote, and have very different needs than the working class. They’re the ones who have been packing our ballots with centrists and conservatives.

We should be voting twice every two years, not once every four, for federal elections alone. Sign up for mailers if you forget. Research the candidates on the ballot, rather than relying on advertising to coerce you into doing your civic duty.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

currious of the chicken/egg scenerio when it comes to candidates on the ballot though. IE is there only one candidate in the primaries because no one is going to vote anyway, or is no one going to the primaries because only one person is on the ballot.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A lack of challengers is exceedingly rare. I was just discussing Fetterman’s election in another thread, where someone was saying he was better than Dr. Oz, but both options sucked. He also had three challengers in a primary that only saw 8.5% attendance.

https://www.cnn.com/election/2022/results/pennsylvania/democratic-primaries/senate

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

...i don't bother voting in primary races with only one candidate...

[–] devdoggy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So, what do you think of Minnesota? We have/still have higher than most states for voter turn out. 76% of our state turned out for the 2024 election and that I consider low!!

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I’m referring specifically to the congressional primaries. That’s where we replace the centrist Democrats with progressives who will move the Overton Window back towards the left.

Looks like you had 15.1% statewide in 2024

primary

[–] devdoggy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you consider that to be a higher amount or a lower amount? I saw that our state fluctuates between 9-28?

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, 15% is above the national average for congressional primaries. That’s all we need to change to change the Democratic Party. All the funding in the world won’t matter if we all take it upon ourselves to research the candidates on the ballot and show up at the polls.

For a point of reference, Mamdani broke the record for NYC Mayoral Democratic Primary turnout with just 30%, up from 21% last election. We just need to outnumber the retirees.

[–] devdoggy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Damn, 30%?? That's all it took?? What the fuck is wrong w. Sorry, sorry. I know. I know. Damn it, Americans....

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No God Particles were found.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Let's try a bigger collider!

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago

Well not really because both parties are moving in the same direction just one is a little faster/energetic than the other

[–] TrueStalinistPatriot@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

they find out their composition is exactly the same

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

Yeah, it's mostly hitler-detector

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

Risky, can create an black hole.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Physicists, when a rogue physicist writes a really good essay and makes the nature of gravity reveal itself through a banger argument.

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/051/380/Samuel_read_meme_cover.jpg

Lets see how many Lasalles are born.