this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
120 points (95.5% liked)

Fuck AI

3377 readers
2450 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
themaninblack@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
ogmios@sh.itjust.works
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
120
Journalists Just Roasted Sam Altman To His Face (futurism.com)
submitted 1 day ago by ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"The New York Times, one of the great institutions for a long time, is taking a position that we should have to preserve our users' logs even if they're chatting in private mode, even if they’ve asked us to delete them," the CEO [Sam Altman] explained. "And the lawsuit we're having to fight out, but... we think privacy and AI is an extremely important concept to get right for the future"

This is part of the NYT's lawsuit's discovery process, to find proof of alleged plagiarism.

"Well thank you for your views," the journalist and podcaster said, "and I'll just say it must be really hard when someone does something with your data you don't want them to."

[–] dabu@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This mildly snarky comment is considered roasting now?

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When it's a billionaire, any thing short of bowing down is considered hostile behavior.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

Gotta make the plebs think they're really sticking it to the billionaires. Look at any story about them and it's always desperate to paint billionaires as secretly miserable or like they spend even a single second worrying about what "the poors" think. Any, even mild, resistance is blown up and treated like a massive unified movement of the common man against the wealthy class.

Look at Bezos' wedding. If you believed the BS here, you would think the entire city of Venice was taking a stand and making it hostile for him and that certainly his wedding would be a miserable experience full of protestors and anti-Bezos street art. In reality, barely 100 people ever protested. All the floats and signs you saw posted were performance pieces, quietly removed by officials minutes after they went up. In reality, Bezos and all his rich guests had a great time and didn't see a single protestor because security wouldn't let anyone unvetted come anywhere near the wedding party.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

he left GRILLED with CRISPY skin and WELL DONE eyebrows

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sam Altman BATTERED and BREADED by NYT Journo who ABSOLUTELY COOKS him and then EATS HIM FOR LUNCH!!!

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sam Altman SPITROASTED by three men in a NYT restroom whilst FRYING HIS GIBLETS in their angry mouths.

(I thought I'd follow up, but worse - sorry)

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago

I mean, give it 5 years and I wouldn't be surprised if thats about where we are at with sensationalist titles from people who post 10 videos between 10 and 20 minutes long on youtube or wherever, every damn day.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that kind of comment is going to fly over the head of a lot of stupid people.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago

Until it's Ed Zitron roasting a mute immobile Sam Altman over a literal flame of shadows for hours on end, it's not justice being served.

[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The NYT is trying to get access to all chat logs including private ones and ones that the user requested be deleted? Yeah, no that's really bad, please let's not celebrate that.

That private data could include things that would out trans people, immigrants, and other marginalized groups to a government that is actively building concentration camps.

I don't care about this drama over which billionaire copied another billionaire's stuff. This request is unacceptable and needs to be stopped. Can we counter sue the NYT for breach of private data?

[–] SirQuack@feddit.nl 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

We're talking about OpenAI, and the same Altman that has shown his allegiance to the orange fascist. I don't think a NYT claim is going to change OAI exposing vulnerable groups to the government.

[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I think that's very evocative phrasing for a less-than-productive message. It sounds like saying "we're doomed anyway", which is what the fascists want us to say.

Privacy matters. I've worked at tech companies and many of them (Amazon excluded) honor their privacy policies. Especially companies with a presence in the EU or in based in California

To those reading, feeling like there is no good in the world is a serious sign of depression. If you're looking for a sign to talk to a professional, consider this it