this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
258 points (95.1% liked)

science

19701 readers
450 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 184 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] Vaggumon@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 week ago

Was my first thought too.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"She wont fuck me any more because I started sucking Charlie Kirk's cock!"

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 17 points 1 week ago

It's good to challenge and confirm common sense scientifically. There are many examples where common sense wasn't as sensible as originally thought.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Why date someone who actively votes against your family's best interests?

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 92 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I couldn't imagine marrying someone with totally opposing political views. Disagreements on some issues sure, but totally opposing political views is essentially like having totally opposing values, morals and ethics to a degree, etc. Base things that play a role in determining compatibility.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dating someone with opposing views is the easier of two situations people can find themselves in.

The harder situation is when you date and marry someone with similar views to yours, but then 5, 10, 15, etc years into the marriage they get radicalized by family members or YouTube. And suddenly their opinions change overnight and you are legally bound to an angry, hostile stranger.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The good old dehu-Manosphere. Malignant, cancerous trash run by grifters and signal boosted by insecure mysognists.

Edit: I see we have some fans of Joe Rogaine, Jordan Small-Peterson, and or Andrew T-hate on here.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I thought I was going crazy when this person I went on a couple dates with told me she was gonna pursue the other guy. She had said he was a Trump supporter and was offended at some things he’d said to her. Must have had she face of a movie star and a genius in bed. I was pretty offended, but whatever.

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like you dodged a massive bullet lol.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 week ago

My partner is a refugee who escaped a regime that locked her up for advocating for democracy, so I clearly won.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some women never grow out of their "bad boys" phase, so there's that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, if my wife didn't think other people deserved the right to exist it would put quite the strain on our relationship.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

especially if it turns out you are one of the people who doesn't deserve the right to exist, just that she magically makes an exception for you specifically because you're one of the good ones

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

As someone who genetically inherited a chronic life threatening illness, I am one of those people to the GOP.

[–] rarbg@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The real question: how do they make it past the dating stage?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

They start out aligned, but then one person's ideology changes over time (perhaps even after marriage).

[–] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was raised a combination of atheist (mom) and Quaker (dad) - the atheism definitely won, though I did internalize a decent amount of the Quakerism... I was engaged to a Catholic girl in my mid-20s. We discussed things early on, I said I'd respect her beliefs if she'd respect my lack thereof, and for a while it worked out nicely, we'd talk about spiritual stuff, but neither of us was trying to convert the other, it was more of a "how do you feel about x" or "how do you explain y"... But after a while, she decided that since I was "preventing" her from going to church some Sundays (I wasn't, I was fine with her going without me, she just didn't want to if she had the option to stay in bed and fool around with me, and why on earth would I turn her down?) that she wanted me to go with her the next Sunday whenever she skipped one. In retrospect, this was the first nail in the coffin of our relationship, but of course I didn't recognize it at the time. It took us moving in together permanently for me to see how controlling she was, and how mean she could be if she didn't get her way...

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

She was a church-going catholic, wanted you to go too, but was living together before marriage (mortal sin), fooling around (mortal sin) and engaged to an atheist (not a sin in itself but frowned upon)? I mean yeah, just the sheer contradiction of these is a red flag, no wonder the girl ended up being messed up later on

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Sometimes you don't know. Or think it's not important.

There's this thing basically (you've probably heard about it), "I don't like X people, but you're good because you're not like them". X can be race, gender, any other things. When you are with that kinda person as long as they like you, you won't feel how they are, they'll treat you nice but it's an exception not the rule. But when they don't like you, they revert back to treating you like the X group. They'll even go "I knew X would be like this" and all.

Now in many cases if they were vocal about it from the beginning you'd notice and might get away. But in many cases they won't be vocal, or they'll talk about it with some extreme examples which you might feel is justified and you know you're not like that so it's fine. And in those cases you yourself might hate those subgroup for ruining your reputation so you might even bond over that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gowron_Howard@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Why would anyone marry a person who openly hates women, minorities, LGBTQ+, and anybody they deem different?

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (17 children)

Because one or the other person in the relationship isn't being honest which happens quite frequently. People in relationships lie by omission all the time.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who is funding this calibre of research, they also found dogs are more likely to bite if you kick them in the head.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In the western scientific model, this is how we differentiate truths from anecdotes and assumptions. Not sure why this needs to be repeated in every thread about the results of research.

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

No one is casting aspersions on the scientific method or the value of research, what is questionable in this case is that the conclusion simply follows naturally from the hypothesis. The proposition here is that people who have opposing political views are more likely to be antagonistic to each other, that is a tautology.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And yet, you’ll see many people posting elsewhere on social media that it shouldn’t be relevant.

Can’t imagine trying to share a life with someone who didn’t share my values, but there seems to be a contingent that think that other things should be more important.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I cant imagine marrying a fascist

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

My wife has a friend who is a quirky anime loving girl with no desire for kids, not religious, and makes good money in healthcare.

Her friend is married to a hardcore Trump cultist that really wants kids, is very religious, and despite not having a good paying job, wants his wife to stay home and tend to the future kids.

My wife and I just honestly don't understand how they are married.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't worry, it's only a matter of time and they will join you in not understanding.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] supernight52@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Lol that divorce is coming, it's just a matter of "when" not "if."

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago

Yeah no shit. If my partner thinks social welfare is bad and i am a socialist, ofc we wont get along

[–] Libra@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago

Couples with opposing views on many things face higher risk of separation, is this a surprise to anyone?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Considering we are reaching a point where the political differences May very well might be whether your spouse deserves to exist and not be chattel breeding slaves, yeah easy to guess why it's a deal breaker.

[–] MelloniDev@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago

Something something floor made out of floor

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't get along well with people who aren't at least within "discussing distance" politically. I wonder how people even date when they don't agree on some fundamentals.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago

it's the difference between "i don't think that's a good way to make food cheaper" and "i don't think poor people deserve to eat"

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago
[–] Cherry@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A lot of people saying how does this happen, it happens over time with small shifts. It happens because our stability as communities and nations is changing faster and more frequently.

Question is when do you take off the wedding ring? (or mental equivalent) because your promise to this person is most likely the strongest conviction most people hold. For better or for worse, implies we understand a partnership has ups and downs that we ride through. A fundamental change is attitude could be seen as an up or a down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

No shit sherlock

[–] Buske@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Well when one side wants to literally murder the other, Yeah.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 8 points 1 week ago

I love the virtue signaling the OP triggered haha

load more comments
view more: next ›