this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
397 points (98.1% liked)

politics

24127 readers
2897 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/40905844

With some prominent Democrats and liberal pundits arguing for the party to try to win Elon Musk back to its side, you have to ask: Is American politics simply a matter of who can best kiss the ass of narcissistic reactionary billionaires?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

We should make sure his life is a living hell at any post he moves to. Make sure anything he touches fails just like Tesla and make sure he can't have any more kids.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I don't understand why it's so difficult for the US to apply the Chinese approach.
Has anyone heard from Jack Ma lately? Is it really a bad thing?

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Is American politics simply a matter of who can best kiss the ass of narcissistic reactionary billionaires?

Always has been.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I misread the headline and thought it was a cautionary statement, explaining that elon musk was going around "woo-ing" at people, and you should (under no circumstances) "woo" back.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago

"do not stare at the musk. It's will perceive it as a threatening gesture and fling poo at you"

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Sounds like something someone stoned out their tree WOOuld do though

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

Keep him away from Ric Flair.

[–] trashboat@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

Made me think of Woo Back Wednesday

Wooooo

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 72 points 3 days ago (2 children)

With him leaving the way he did literally nobody in the country likes this man and aiding with him in any way is political suicide.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 83 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you're saying the Dems are 100% going to try to win him over

[–] omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They might try to run him for office

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Musk-Clinton 2028: Bad Decisions Boogaloo

DNC:

write that down WRITE THAT DOWN

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Don't threaten Dem leadership with a good time. They're liable to put him at the top of the ticket in 28.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 44 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He’s a fucking Nazi. If you try to woo him, you are too. This isn’t rocket science dem dipshits, you’re supposed to be something beyond a fundraising org.

Interesting that you would bring up rocket science.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 10 points 3 days ago

But like... What if you team up with the Nazis, and just compromise with them? I bet that goes over really well historically

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s so embarrassing to watch democrats constantly groveling for money.

It’s telling that the leaked audio of the DNC vice president fracas had the establishment guy (Mike Miquetoast or something) whine to David Hogg that he wanted to get back to the real business of fundraising.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

The real hard work done in government. The real actual change in the world. The real benefit to the country at large.

FUNDRAISING

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seems Dems just love losing elections.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 9 points 3 days ago

The thing that shocked me... I was fully expecting that kind of BS ideas from say Jeffries, Schumer, Newsome etc....

But then looking at it the one I've seen talking about it was... Ro Khanna, which was one I considered in the "overall tollerable" side of the democrats.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (5 children)

He could be a useful tool too disassemble the corrupted administration. We just lack a sufficient craftsman to wield him, and sufficient balls to dispose of him afterwards.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I hope he actually does create another party and split the Republicans, ensuring that none of them win another election ever again.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Be careful, Hillary tried to create an easy opponent too. If we've learned anything from 2024, it's that desperate people will vote for any change. Even if that change is bad.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

The whole bifurcated party thing cuts both ways though. The vast majority of the even slightly progressive people are sick and tired of the Democrats handholding with the Republicans only narrowly being the least appetizing item on the menu. There's nobody standing for the people. Everybody's standing for the oligarchs. I'm not saying I would vote Republican ever, But we've got to be able to do something relatively better than whatever this is we're doing now.

The Republicans would split on fiscal versus "morals". Immorally progressive fiscally conservative party to rapillase the publicans might draw a number of the wealthy Democrats with it.

There are other countries out there that do a better job. And it's quite clear now that our Constitution does not have the teeth It was designed to have.

[–] Rancor_Tangerine@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Seriously. Dems need to get over the endless purity tests. Where that old meme with the communist kangaroo anyway?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This illustrates the issue of having only 2 political parties. You used to have left and right. Then the right extended all the way to batshit crazy nazi while losing touch with the centre-right, and it collapsed to keep only t̂he nazis. Meanwhile the "left" extended to centre then all the way to the economic right.

Now you have a nazi party and an everything else party, and people ask the last to "get their shit together", as if socialists would sort out their differences with neo-liberals and conservatives over a quick diner and build a common ground plan.

That just can't work.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It also accentuates the need for ranked choice voting or something similar. You need to give a people a way to say what they want to say with nuance and power. If everyone says they wish they could vote for someone else but need to vote strategically then parties never need to be good and can just thump on about defeating the evil party.

Yes, I’m from Canada and vote NDP, how did you know?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Washedupcynic@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

They should not try to win him back. They should deport his bitch ass to mars on one of his own rockets.

load more comments
view more: next ›