this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
210 points (100.0% liked)

memes

23298 readers
317 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 34 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

normies think politics = elections. like they actually do not perceive economics and politics as being related

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

Why wouldn't they? They have literally been told since birth that politics and economics are two completely separate things, and that the reason communism failed is because it attempted to connect them.

It is only the sons and daughters of the bourgeois and politicians that usually have an understanding of the connections these things have, and more over, that they need to maintain control of them.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago

It's so bizarre how people fail to understand that economics and politics are inseparable. Economics determines how labor and resources are allocated; politics determines who benefits from that allocation. One answers 'how,' the other 'why.'

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago

That's basically everyone who isn't some type of socialist. Even terminally online fascists and libertarians think economics and politics are seperate things. I think I've met maybe one lib in my entire life who knew the two are the same thing, but that's because he was a professor of political science.

[–] EatPotatoes@hexbear.net 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s worse when they get into politics and just seem obsessed with taxes, treats and thinking boycotts or collecting dvds from goodwill are praxis.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or becoming very weird about immigration or welfare

[–] EatPotatoes@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

And any opposition to mass migration is really just ensuring migrants have as few rights as possible while still working. These people don’t want to grow food or work in factories. An equal world with limited need for mass migration would be their worst nightmare. They are would be TikTok celebrities looking to run some joke into the ground or engage the most pathetic styles of activism.

[–] Bruja@hexbear.net 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

From 🥚 in 2019 to “nonbinary (they/them)” today.

Comrade Simbarashe 🇿🇼
"I'm not really into politics. Anyway, let me tell you how much I hate my job, my boss, my landlord, my shitty health insurance, my student loans, my town's public transportation and the fact that I come home too tired to do anything after work every day."

https://twiiit.com/yo_its_simba/status/1119015589505323008

[–] tamagotchicowboy@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

More like not into the politics of the big bourgeois dictatorship, if only more knew

[–] orangeyouglad@lemmy.today 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

sign me up for the party trying to solve these issues....wait

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 2 weeks ago

Regarding childcare being provided: I don't see why parents who wish to be their children's care providers can't be trained and paid by the state. Granted, there are parents who want time away from home responsibilities to take on other responsibilities, and that's fine, too. Perhaps one parent would choose to care for some neighborhood children in addition to their own. I also feel housespouses should be compensated for endless hours of unpaid labor. This would give economic freedom to leave unhealthy or abusive relationships, while also acknowledging that sometimes people who start out being compatible as partners can grow in different directions, and while it may not be an abusive relationship, can certainly end up being unhappy which can lead to unhealthy. I mean, I understand that everything can't all happen at once, but this just seems like it can and should be implemented from the go. If the state can pay nannies and other domestic help, there's no reason why it can't pay a housespouse/stay at home parent. But proper education and training should be requisite, because these skills are absolutely transferrable to the same outside professions and to other professions with not a lot of additional training.

[–] loomy@lemy.lol -3 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

sounds like you're a fan of self fulfilling prophecies

[–] loomy@lemy.lol -3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'd prefer effective pollicies.

[–] Guamer@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] loomy@lemy.lol -1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The important thing is that you've managed to feel smug without doing anything. Congrats!

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

at least i dont go on the internet to tell strangers how they feel

[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

PSL and groups like them do a lot of good work at more local levels. Feel like that's worth pointing out

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Like what? I'd be curious to know more.

[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, for instance, I live in a major city. Our branch of PSL runs food distribution events, has organized a ton of pro palestine protests, have pushed to elect socialist local aldermans, and more.

Pick a big city and find their PSL branch social media. You'll see what they're up to.

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 1 points 2 weeks ago

glad to hear they help people

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 2 weeks ago

Last I checked Marxism has been proven to be effective time and again, but you do you.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

hey I'm just curious but do you know which leader presided over the greatest increase in life expectancy in recorded history?

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I doubt there's reliable data, but my guess would be sargon of akkad

[–] miz@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] loomy@lemy.lol 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

how do you figure that's a greater increase than going from ape life to mesopotamia?

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Your understanding of history may actually be more pathetic than your understanding of political theory.

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

at least i dont attack strangers on the internet

[–] TommyBeans@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Weaponizing your general unwillingness to learn is attacking in it’s own way

[–] miz@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

absolutely abysmal reading comprehension. good luck with your ape life

[–] miz@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

do you think I said recorded history so you could handwave with this kind of dumb caveat

this answers my question about you being in high school

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 0 points 2 weeks ago

not sure why you're being so hostile

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 38 points 2 weeks ago

It's such a shame that a better world is completely impossible. Oh well, on to the apocalypse I guess.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The world around you is not limited by your ability to understand it. I don't understand surgery. From my perspective, cutting someone open and moving stuff around "doesn't look realistic". Yet surgeries happen. I'm not a surgeon, so I don't go around telling surgeons what is possible.

[–] loomy@lemy.lol -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Is there a global socialist takeover I missed?

[–] dead@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago

Absurd question. Do you think that the purpose of a socialist party is to form after a "global socialist takeover"?

The post said "sign me up for the party trying to solve these issues". PSL is trying to solve these issues. PSL is trying to make more people into socialists.

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Why global? Ah, because the west will be the last to socialism. Not yet global, but certainly inevitable.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] loomy@lemy.lol -1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

50% of most countries are voting extremely conservative, and a big seperate chunk vote moderate. The appetite isn't there among voters right now for liberalism ; let alone socialism.

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

Moderates and conservatives are both overwhelmingly liberals... Extremely unserious political understanding.

[–] triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago

That's because liberalism isn't a halfway point between socialism and conservatism it is, to misquote Stalin, fascism with a happy face sticker on it.

Most "western" countries' governments have spent the last ~100 years waging outright war on socialism through coups, assassinations, imprisonments, and propaganda.

Political (and historical) education has been hacked away so much that most people couldn't give a coherent definition of "socialism" anyway - and socialist policies poll extremely well if you short-circuit the propaganda by not mentioning the forbidden s-word.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

The purpose of a party like PSL is to build a mass movement able to build socialism. It's far beyond just voting every few years. Democracy happens when the masses are in motion, and that's what PSL aims to achieve.

[–] DengistDonnieDarko@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

skill issue

[–] Lavender@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like a lack of imagination or a lack of willingness to try on your part.

smartest liberal