this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
1091 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

7643 readers
2673 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

oop

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

asynchronous

Any form of text based communication is asynchronous

[–] MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

as in the server chats with another

Centralized servers in which 2 users talk can be considered "synchronous" because they get the message nearly instantly, but yea, we often use NoSQL async calls for instant messaging apps

[–] Walop@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 hours ago

I guess that's why someone decided to build a chat app on the email protocol and infrastructure.

https://delta.chat/en/

[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You can do it from a terminal. Us Linux kids will never let it die.

[–] greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

yeah, aerc and neomutt are two decent options

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

telnet email_server_ip_addr 25

[–] TerraRoot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 35 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Mail has the big advantage of being totally cross platform. And it works, basically everywhere.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 25 points 12 hours ago

All the application protocols were supposed to be cross-platform! It’s something the corporatisation of the net undermined to an extent

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 62 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Sidenote: Remember when having an email address was enough, you didn't have to have a fucking phone number as well? Stop trying to de-anonymize the internet, you're making more problems than you're solving

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 11 points 12 hours ago

They're not trying to solve any problem beyond their own, potential resistance to false authority.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm using cpanel email and it's terrible. Can someone recommend something cheap but better than cpanel?

[–] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

Some places block email coming from my cpanel email.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 21 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Reality is everyone has an email, and everyone will keep having an email. My 10 year old has an email so they could sign up to epic and steam. You basically need it to use the internet at all. So of course it will survive.

Outside of business though, when was the last time you sent an email to someone you know?

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

My mother uses email for nearly everything. I'm 31 now, but in high school she'd email me from the basement that dinner is ready.

Just last month I received this... we chat on WhatsApp and phone calls regularly as well.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 10 points 11 hours ago

That's cute. She treats it like writing letters or maybe postcards given the length of the message.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 13 hours ago

I forwarded tickets to my wife. But for "normal" communication I emailed the city about a citation they gave me for my yard.

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

My ex emailed me from a new account when he thought I'd blocked him everywhere else. I hadn't, but I did after that!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 73 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

It's why SMS still exists too. It's from an era where everyone just used open standards instead of trying to create their own thing for money. Big tech conglomerates like we have now didn't exist. The state of the tech industry and it's proprietary standards is absolutely fucked.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

SMS was never intended to be available to end users. It was built as a side channel to help field techs with diagnostics. When consumer handsets started to add features, it was co-opted to provide what we know it as today.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

That explains why way back when I tried to read the GSM (1.x) specification out of curiosity, it turned out SMS were going via a "control channel".

Always wondered why the data for those was going via a control channel rather than some kind of data channel.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 25 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (4 children)

Google is trying to kill SMS. My new android by default has sms disabled, defaulting to RCS with "try sending sms instead if rcs fails to send" option being off by default, which makes no sense from user perspective

[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

RCS is actually a huge improvement over SMS, as it is fully encrypted. One of the few times I've ever approved of something Google did...

[–] spookedintownsville@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If only it was an open standard...

[–] Bman915@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It... is? It's an open standard that anyone can use and implement. The main provider is Google and there has been a huge push from them to get Apple to adopt, which they mostly have. It's not 'owned' by any company. It's predominantly serviced by Google, but is in fact an open standard. Google and others have their own format which is how they and their apps interpret and interact with each other, but it is an open standard. There are some backend and requirements for it which stops most from setting it up and implementing off the shelf and just going with Google, but you absolutely could use and make your own format with the standard.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 6 points 11 hours ago

Yep, main reason it's associated with Google because they bought a company (Jibe Mobile) making one of the main backend service offerings and offered cloud hosting of it, so providers just went with that rather than rolling out their own software.

Also with Apple ignoring it in favour of iMessage, Google was the only one supporting it on handsets. Google client + Google backend = people think it's Google's iMessage competitor.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

IRC and forums as well to a lesser extent.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 19 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Much much lesser. IRC has basically died to successors. Everybody still uses email sometimes.

[–] DrWorm@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

IRC is still a pretty strong backbone for Twitch chat. At least it was a couple of years ago.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Forums are still banging around however. Lots of places still use them, and thank god for that.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago

Not so much though.

There was a moment when forums were the only kind of community but now forum use is dwarved by discord and reddit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 174 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

It’s reliable, it’s simple, it’s free, and virtually everyone who uses the internet has one. Email won’t be replaced for a LONG time.

[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 78 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (24 children)

To be fair, if it is "free" you are probably paying your mail provider with your data.

[–] i_am_hiding@aussie.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

My mail server is in the cabinet above my desk.

I guess you're right - my mail provider does have all my data - but my mail provider is Me!

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This is why I kind of hate microblogging platforms. This could just be part of a conversation, but shown of context every post is turned into a soundbite and takes on levels of faux-profundity that they can’t possibly support. Yeah, email has been around forever; so what?

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

What faux-profundity is on display here? Sometimes people just talk. Sometimes this includes observations. Kinda like what you did with your comment. I don't understand why you're bringing hate to a tea chat, but I suppose it can be good to get off your chest.

load more comments
view more: next ›