this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
41 points (95.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13800 readers
628 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Exactly what the title says, Christianity in all its various strains still stems from the horrendous old testament, and with all the awful shit that endorses, as well as with things like Calvinism and the general doomsday cult foundations in the religion, why do some people still act so charitably towards it? Christianity has proven itself to be a morally corrupt and oppressive institution at every turn. Or maybe I'm just too negative? edgeworth-shrug

EDIT Ok guys I get it this was rather reductionist, and I definitely was disregarding all the good that religious folks have done, and that religion has inspired people to do, but again over correcting into enthusiastic support for religion can also be problematic.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 48 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Christianity as an organization of political power is a horrible stain on humanity and likely always will be.

Christianity as a personal or small community religion is actually a really beautiful and hopeful thing. Christianity does not start and end with the old testament, it ends with an overcoming of many of the regressive messages within the old testament and strong recurring themes of hope based around community. The bible is a pretty important world text and has a lot of great messages in it.

Basically, attack systemic issues and organizations rather than individual beliefs.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 35 points 5 days ago

this i've had more luck in my personal life pushing left curious Christians further left using this methodology. i don't belitte their beliefs just reinforce the good stuff, focus on the institutions, etc. there are legions of seemingly "socially conservative Christians" out there that are actually just nascent christian socialists but just don't know that's an option because all they see on TV is demonic Prosperity Theory grifters and psychotic fire and brimstone shit

[–] Andrzej3K@hexbear.net 42 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I do often feel like we overcorrected after New Atheism, and also Catholicism gets too much of free pass on the anglo internet, which irks when you live somewhere where Catholic orgs are literally funding the hard right, BUT secularism is vitally important imo, and that means freedom of worship for everyone

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 5 days ago

Yeah, it's not fun sitting in Poland and anglo socs doing apologetics for cath establishment

[–] Calmrade@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago

And they'll use that freedom to worship as freedom to oppress. Would you give a Nazi the time of day in debating their beliefs?

[–] Parzivus@hexbear.net 32 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Because most people on this site aren't Marxists. It's as simple as that. They want to believe that religions that have been oppressing people for thousands of years can be reformed somehow. It's kinda baffling for a website with such a large LGBT+ userbase.

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Mate, Islam paved the way for me to embrace Communism. Saying this as an atheist, it's silly to alienate people from our cause because they were raised culturally to believe in some religion or another.

Astrology is goofy, not materialist in any way, and really bothers me, but I don't go telling radical comrades I've been out doing direct actions with that they aren't real Marxists because they make that thinking error.

[–] Parzivus@hexbear.net 28 points 5 days ago

"Our cause?" Hexbear doesn't have a cause, it doesn't do anything. It has the least revolutionary potential of any leftist website I've ever used. I'm here because it's fun to shitpost sometimes.

IRL, yeah, there are better uses of your time than trying to convince people that astrology is bullshit. But having a materialist worldview and believing in astrology (or religion, for that matter) are contradictory, and getting rid of those brainworms via self-crit is something any communist should be trying to do.

I should mention that I'm not trying to portray myself as the perfect commie here, I still have my own brainworms. It's just the kind of thing that we should all be striving to get rid of.

[–] MiraculousMM@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hey I'm fine with that viewpoint on religion as a whole but this part:

most people on this site aren't Marxists

is completely unnecessary. Good comrades can disagree on things like this and still be materialists.

[–] Parzivus@hexbear.net 19 points 5 days ago

I don't mean it in the sense that "everyone that disagrees with me isn't a real Marxist," I genuinely don't think the majority of people on this website read theory. Hexbear leans much more into shitposting than other leftist forums I use, and I don't see nuanced materialist analysis here very often.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 33 points 5 days ago (4 children)

First rule of politics: learn to count.

Socialism needs power, not purity. Power comes from the size of the support base.

Socialism has historically been helped by religious support same way as it's been helped by nationalist support.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is gonna blow your mind, but you can be religious and a good socialist at the same time.

The church closest to my home is where I do some of my community gardening. They know full well that I'm a socialist, an atheist, and bisexual, and they don't care in the slightest. As far as they're concerned, actions trump beliefs—good works are God's work, they've told me. They're fundraising to build an affordable housing co-op for displaced First Nations folks in the community, and they broke ground on the first block last year!

Theory didn't stop in 1844 when Marx said we need to move beyond religion for the working class. We can do better.

[–] Calmrade@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago

We can move beyond their garbage beliefs. The Bible is trash and should be treated as such. It promotes hate,removed, murder, genocide. Oh such good values to uphold.

[–] buh@hexbear.net 29 points 5 days ago

Bit idea: Guy who calls the new testament the woke testament

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 28 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Judaism also stems from the old testament, should we remove Jews for what is in their holy book?

The Catholic Church (And the Anglican Church, and many Lutheran Churches, and thousands of Baptist Churches) has committed great evils, but original sin is not a marxist doctrine and we cannot hold the average Christian responsible for the actions of everyone everywhere who professed the faith, and you are not likely to see support for such things amongst the Christians posting here. If a Christian is supporting the slave trade or the nazis on hexbear they are likely to be banned and find no support among other believers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Surface-level interpretation.

Every religion gets swarmed and contorted by reactionaries because they see they can use it as a source of power, never mind how there is almost always pro-social, anti-oppression, and anti-stratification principles at the core.

the horrendous old testament

  1. This kind of New Atheist position ends up having the same approach to the Bible that fundies do.

  2. You mean the Jewish scriptures, right?
    fry

[–] Calmrade@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So where is the billion plus movement of progressive religious people then?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago

Liberation theologies have quite a bit of influence in Latin America, Palestine, Ireland, and among Black communities in the US.

[–] SeasonalDepressionEnjoyer@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ah... I didn't mean to dog whistle or anything like that, I see the issue but it's just frustrating to see people endorse these things that have CW (Suicide, SA etc)

spoilerlead to the suicide of one of my friends, and SA'd others that went to the Catholic schools nearby.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

We don't defend Pol Pot, Ceausescu, etc; and we don't give up on Communism because of a couple abuses of power, even if they caused lots of bloodshed.

We prize the ability to distinguish between a movement itself and specific cases of institutions that spring up from it.

[–] Babs@hexbear.net 24 points 5 days ago

Pol Pot, Ceausescu, and progressive Christians are all outliers in their movements.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Boynomoder@hexbear.net 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] SeasonalDepressionEnjoyer@hexbear.net 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Shit my bad I take it all back. hank-realization

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

a) institution is not religion tho, beliefs are what you make of them

b) new testament is compatible with socialism in myriads of way (one might say suspiciously so :lunacharsky-shining:).

c) soviet crusade against religion was wildly unsuccessful, to put it mildly (both at home and especially abroad). you come at 2000 year old institution, you best not miss and things of that nature

d) ...last sigh of the oppressed implies until there is memory of oppression you can't jettison religion, not really, until people can control their fate, they'll always be religious in some shape or form somewhere

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

new testament is compatible with socialism in myriads of way

There's also a myriad of ways it is not. You won't find a less dialectical materialist analysis than the sermont on the mount

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

i'm just saying, with the situation the left and the world is in, and adding historical experience, i think it's counterproductive to dismiss religion flat-out (or rather engage in pointless fighting around it, we don't have power to change it, and religions have some affinities we can draw on, depending on religion/means of production development/society safety nets as they are/depraved profit seeking stage)

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It is valid to highlight the good done by Christians and the ways in which Christians can support and be a part of a socialist project, but I don't think it's necessary to pretend that the new testament is inherent socialist to do so.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

institution is not religion tho, beliefs are what you make of them

If you claim that every major group that claims to be christian is not actually christian, then what claim do you have to be an actual christian instead of them?
Also, if you consider every such group to not good, then why do you want to base your beliefs on their fiction that they consistently use for horrible stuff that ranges from abuse on a personal level to colonialism, slavery, and genocide?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RiotDoll@hexbear.net 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think religion is good.

Sorry I guess, but i've run the gamut in my life. I used to be a little edgelord preteen that delighted in shitting on belief. i had an earnest christian phase. i had a heresy and occult phase. i'm still in an "academic study of these matters is cool as hell" phase - I think if you're overly reductive, you get it in your head to only measure what religion does on a socio-political level, and this is a fucking trap. Anything tied to power structures can and will be abused, but that doesn't make these places the sole determiner of worth and value for anything, but for religion it's especially busted.

Religion and spirituality are like, really important elements of the human psyche. I can't tell you why that is, but I can tell you that even in instances of non-belief in an individual, the overwhelming tendency is that other structures replace it and act as a surrogate - something in our mind needs whatever religion provides. It can get it elsewhere of course, i can think of some large social projects that tried to redirect that impulse towards common, human-centered goals and sometimes, for some people, it works, but it's at least clear to me that being reductive about this and treating it as problematic or bad or somehow more trouble than it's worth, is coming from a place of disinterest and lack of understanding.

[–] Calmrade@hexbear.net 17 points 5 days ago

Religion is the opiate of the masses. Perhaps in a less sick and damaged world their would be no need for such a medication to ease their suffering. Maybe we'd already be living in that world if they'd stop waiting for the afterlife and actually care about the world around them for once.

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

i suppose there's gotta be somewhere for the 1% of christians who wouldn't lynch every gay person on the planet to chat amongst themselves

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

still stems from the horrendous old testament

No investigation, no right to speak.

[–] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I have investigated the old testament. god supports horrendous things.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

What I meant was that the whole point of Jesus and the new Covenant was to fulfill the old one and liberate humanity with a new law of love.

p.s. I don't know if it's super appropriate for me to participate in this thread though, I don't want to take a space away from people who have been victimized by religious bigotry from venting about that or voicing valid concerns. There's a time and a place to set the record straight wrt theology, I appreciate that it might not be this one.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Because there are billions of Christians on planet earth and that's not changing anytime soon. We also have Islam and Judaism communities too. I'm also going to make a bold prediction that the youth are going to turn towards religion in the coming years and break the trend of rising non belief. Just look at the USA, Christianity was on a decline until 2019, but then numbers stabilised. I expect that the numbers will now rise.

And before anyone says anything about how I'm some religious person, I'm an atheist, but I'm calling it how I see it.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I expect that the numbers will now rise.

It's already rising.

British church attendance has risen by 50% in the last 6 years. The two largest groups that attendance has grown for are 65+ and 18-24 year olds (Gen Z).

https://www.biblesociety.org.uk/research/quiet-revival

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MiraculousMM@hexbear.net 16 points 5 days ago

over correcting into enthusiastic support for religion can also be problematic.

I don't generally see this happen around here, I feel hexbear users have pretty even-keeled views on religion as a whole, barring those with religious trauma who are completely justified in their negative views. I'd certainly never allow outright evangelism anywhere on the site. And as others have said, the christianity comm is barely alive, same with /c/judaism, and /c/islam has been locked forever due to lack of mods. This is not a site that's enthusiastic about religion.

[–] Calmrade@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago

No, I agree with you. State atheism and a significant reduction in the power of the church is only logical. Religion is extremely reactionary. Look who they support and promote time and time again. Many of them believe Trump was chosen by God.

Basing your laws and values off of a 2000 year old law book is complete nonsense. We don't look to ancient misconceptions for guidance in any other field. How could people who didn't even know about the solar system hold the secrets to the universe?

How can anyone here defend the beliefs that: Being gay is an abomination. Abortion is always wrong. Evolution is untrue. Israel belongs to the Jewish people. Etc, etc.

Why is masking there reaction by talking to an imaginary friend and getting his approval acceptable? The worst of them deserve the wall, the rest harsh reeducation.

[–] Terrarium@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I would recommend thinking about it this way: whenever a comrade is "wrong" about something, literally anything, how much do you make it your business to "correct" them?

When it comes to socialism and organizing, the answer must always be, "to the extent it improves the organization or helps them personally". A sign of a dysfunctional social space is that people are constantly getting in each others' business for no reason other than that they are "wrong" about something. Dysfunctional socialist spaces will even dress this up in left language and (ironically enough), for example, say it causes disunity for a member to be dating a liberal. Of course, the disunity comes from the org trying to control a member's romantic life.

In this scenario, what is the existence of socialist Christians here actually doing to disrupt you or others? Are there certain problematic posts that inspired your question or did you just see "Christian" and start attacking? Are there a bunch of Calvinists in there doing Calvinism to us? Do you think you might actually be the source of disruption in thus scenario?

[–] SeasonalDepressionEnjoyer@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

An odd amount of people went to bat for the Papacy as an institution in the various threads over the Pope's thread. Just made me think about this, but it wasn't exactly warranted outside of that.

[–] Terrarium@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago

The only examples I've seen of this are people saying it's antisocial and counterproductive behavior to crab dance this pope's death. It definitely is antisocial, it's only something a small group would enjoy and most would be very alienated by it.

This is just a fact of what it is. For some it makes sense to embrace the antisocial, often creating and preferring a new in-group. Unfortunately this tends to mean cloistering oneself and failing to actually build anything, and adopting habits that prevent it.

This forum's name was originally from a podcast by not-particularly-funny white guys in New York. They have not actually built anything. They are not of an organization. They don't mobilize anyone to do anything. They make snarky jokes poking fun at the liberal political establishment and electoral politics and are increasingly irrelevant. That is the inevitable trajectory of seeking conflict and infighting and being eagerly disrespectful to your comrades.

[–] SmokinStalin@hexbear.net 13 points 5 days ago

Its clear to anyone paying attention that Jesus would be a communist.

[–] imogen_underscore@hexbear.net 13 points 5 days ago
[–] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Or maybe I'm just too negative?

I know everyone has their own relationship or lack thereof with religion, I've never really had an inclination for any of it, even that time in high school when I hung out with the goth kids who were into Wicca. While they're few and far between especially in the west where it's largely been subsumed with capitalist brainworms, I've still known a few people that try very hard to live by the precepts of caring about your fellow humans and if it gives them some solace I can't really get too upset about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›