this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
371 points (96.3% liked)

Television

683 readers
503 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities


Other Television Communities

:

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.

  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.

  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.

  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.

  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.

  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags. ****

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The Rogue storyline proves that New Who has a writing problem that has nothing to do with being too woke, and, in fact, at least in parts more with being not woke enough. What reason could there be to hint at, introduce, develop, carry out, end, and bury a love interest all within one single episode, if not as concession for people against those story line to be able to avoid it altogether? Disney isn't actually progressive, they never were, and where corporate pride/POC representation is implemented it's because the cost calculation tells them it pays off, not because they actually represent any of those values.

The Doctor would never give up on anyone. Heck, in the next episode he cried more about some random guard post than the man who proposed to him. Until he at least attempts to get Rogue back I will have to assume the Doctor has either been replaced by some kind of doppelganger, or the writers at Disney lack the balls to actually portray a modern and gay Doctor after all.

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

They just don't want to take credit for making doctor who suck themselves. Doctor who has always been woke, but now it just sucks

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I've always loved the themes doctor who tries to address in its episodes, but it's sad in the most recent seasons they seem to have lost any form of subtlety/intelligence...

It used to be episodes showing you a moral dilemma, raising the question and often making it clear there is no perfect solution. The characters would make choice, maybe not the ones you'd make, but from understandable motivations. Sometimes the bad guys would have understandable motivations, and you'd feel sorry for them.

Lately it has been so black & white. More like "see this guy, he represents trump, trump is bad, he is bad". No dilemmas, no raising questions, not letting you think for yourself or challenging your beliefs. More like "this is good, this is bad, don't think more about it please".

I also don't think doctor who has become more woke, but it has become so much less intelligent, no longer considering the viewer as a person capable of reaching their own conclusions. Everything has to be clear and black and white. And if you don't agree with the protagonists you're bad.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Agreed. Not sure how much the Disney distribution deal has affected how they handle subtlety. Or just a new show runner that might just not be as good.

I found Steven Moffat to be very good while Russel T Davis has had some excellent moments during his first run, with true existential terror surfacing in the show, lately it has become a Disney ride.

Not sure if he lost some key contributor that gave the show an edge or they decided to try to bring a younger audience in. It doesn’t feel like it has the gravitas it had there for a while.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don’t see people defending the newer shows by saying the writing is great or the plot tight. I just see arguments about politics and social messages.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The show turned to shit many years ago, way before any wokeness. There's nothing to defend.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The corporations are just using the culture war to deflect any criticism against the bad product they made. Like criticize the new Assasins Creed or Snow White and people, especially the gauche caviar press, will call you a racist, even when you weren’t even criticizing the “wokeness”

[–] Val@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

this is what doctor who does. Just like in the 80s. It has it's ups and down, but its always changing. That's what makes it special. The doctor regenerates, the show-runner changes and the show moves on. It's not like the other shows that just get cancelled. It's doctor who. It's the longest running sci-fi show in the world.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

I look forward to future Dr Whos.

I’ve been watching that show for decades, and I have seen the ups and downs.

This cycle of shoddy work is unique because of the era. But if there is any luck I hope to see better dr who later, followed by something equally bad but different.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

I feel that the whole "Woke/DEI" era will be remembered as a poorly timed inflection point. On one hand, you had the media conglomerates, who, instead of investing in original content decided to put stock in continuations of established franchises which often had poor writing and were poorly executed. These works also just happened to have a "diversity" angel to them. At the same time, we saw the increase in right wing voices online that started to infiltrate the fandoms of those already established franchises.

Social media algorithms also began to push this kind of content to a wider audience. How many times have you seen a random Youtube video with titles like " X is WOKE PROPAGANDA TRASH! Hollywoke is in DECLINE! " appear in your feed or homepage? If the work in question was a critical flop (i.e. terrible), it was not a flop because of creative deficiencies. No, it was a flop because it had a non-binary black character!

You never heard legitimate criticisms like "Hollywood is putting profits before good entertainment" or "[Show or movie] had poor writing, bad acting, terrible direction and didn't contribute anything to already established canon."

Take Deep Space 9 as an example. A great show with a very diverse cast but that diversity would be useless if the characters weren't as fleshed out as they were. Now imagine what the discourse around DS9 would look like if it were made today:

"A New BLACK Protagonist? Star Trek Has Gone WOKE!"

"Jadzia Dax and Odo: Trans Ideology PROPAGANDA?!"

When a new piece of media comes out and there is a massive stir attached to it, ask yourself this: is the criticism warranted or is it ideology driven?

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The people who cheer for the replacement of historically caucasian/male gender roles with minority actors/women, are the same people who protest the replacement of historically minority/women roles with caucasian/male actors. And they wonder why there's push back.

[–] Skavau@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It depends on context. Doctor Who is a fictional character. Historical figures are not. It isn't hard to understand why there are different reactions there.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Scarlet Johansen as the Major in Ghost in the Shell Tilda Swinton as the Ancient One in Dr Strange Controversy around characters like Iron Fist etc

Asian fictional characters often get white washed. Results in protests from minority groups who feel they're being denied representation in their own culture's created artwork, and roles in movies/shows -- just like how replacing caucasian fictional characters results in protests from groups who feel they're having their cultural representation in media suppressed by minority interests. But whatever man. Guess those dont count.

[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 1 points 6 days ago

The Major is literally a full cyborg, the Scar Jo replacement didn't bother me too much. The ancient one was a Tibetan monk and China actively tries to repress Buddhist representation.

[–] Skavau@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I know nothing about those particular shows or films. I would expect a US remake of a show or film to possibly do recasts.

Does this upset you? I believe Thailand also did a modern reimagining of Snow White too, with a Thai actress playing the role.

Doctor Who has always been a character who can regenerate and reform by design. They're an alien species. I'd argue its more important they're eccentric guile heroes in performance than their sex or race.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So the argument is what, that the white people who had a 'role model' for their kids shouldn't be annoyed that the industry is removing that role model, because race shouldn't matter. But also that race representation matters, and that it's important for other races to have representation by taking over the roles of those figures.

It doesn't upset me, it just doesn't make sense to me. Like I accept that parents want to have positive role models that 'look like' their kids, as it helps kids development. So it makes sense that minority groups want to see themselves represented as such in media, and that they'd celebrate established characters being swapped over to be their race/gender. However, that same line of thinking explains why white people are annoyed that their kids are 'losing' role models that 'look like them'. If you assert that 'race matters' (and I accept that it does for kids), then it seems reasonable to be annoyed that those characters are being 'taken away' for practically the same reason that it seems reasonable for minority groups to be happy to see themselves represented. If race representation matters for the character and kids having positive role models, than its arguably worse to disenfranchise the larger group of kids.

I mean, we're busy watching young guys flock to alpha dumbass influencer bros, in part because there are fewer and fewer positive role models for them to look up to.

[–] Skavau@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

So the argument is what, that the white people who had a ‘role model’ for their kids shouldn’t be annoyed that the industry is removing that role model, because race shouldn’t matter. But also that race representation matters, and that it’s important for other races to have representation by taking over the roles of those figures.

Regarding Doctor Who, Nguti will not be the Doctor forever. He's just one of many. Whether or not he was specifically chosen because he's black or not, I don't know, but I don't see any inherent problem with the Doctor being black. Race shouldn't be core to the identity of the doctor.

I mean, we’re busy watching young guys flock to alpha dumbass influencer bros, in part because there are fewer and fewer positive role models for them to look up to.

I think this is a much wider issue beyond the casting for Doctor Who. I'd argue the general decline of entertainment monoculture in general plays more of a role here than any particular creative decision for remakes or reimagining of TV series and films.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 116 points 1 week ago (8 children)

If they think Doctor Who has "gone" woke, they have not been watching.

I remember Captain Jack Harkness flirting with anything that moves, regardless of gender identity or species.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

These are the same people who say Star Trek has gone woke.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

Or that Rage Against the Machine has gone political

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

They had a black astronaut in 1966.

[–] anomoly_@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

The last time I was sentenced to death, I ordered four hyper-vodkas for my breakfast. All a bit of a blur after that... I woke up in bed with both of my executioners. Lovely couple, they stayed in touch! Can't say that about most executioners.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately his behavior continued on set. Creepy dude.

But his character wasn't meant to be creepy, and I need to remember that from time to time.

[–] nadiaraven@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh damn, that's unfortunate

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago

Context fwiw:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/john-barrowmans-scandals-full-jaw-33702480

My opinions: Was he called out for exposing himself and being incredibly inappropriate? Yes.

Has he apologized and faced consequences? Yes, multiple times, but maybe not enough for some.

Is he a sexual predator? Probably Not.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I have to disagree a bit here, the recent writing has tried to very heavily shoe-horn it in, whereas in the past it was much more naturally present.

I think the worst one for me (before I quit watching) was with the enormous spiders in the hotel run by a very Trumpian figure.

"Trump" wanted to just shoot the enormous spider, but the Doctor stopped him saying "no weapons, ever". The spider then died an agonizing death caused by suffocation on-screen mere seconds later. Her offspring was lured and locked into a storage room with food, after which they would surely either cannibalize themselves or starve. Actually shooting them would've been a mercy at that point.

When presented with the Doctor's solution versus the "Trump" solution, I felt more sympathy for "Trump". And I fucking hate that guy. That's when I knew the writing just wasn't for me anymore.

There's a reason even the more diehard Whovians, who are very much considered "woke" are tuning out. It's not the cast, it's the writing.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

That engine is woke.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nobody who enjoys Dr Who for what it is, a series of morality tales and social commentary, gives a shit about if the Dr Who is woke or if the lead is man, woman or something between, let alone their ethnicity (though for sake of continuity they better have a british accent of some descriptor.)

What long time Who fans don't like is poorly written and executed stories, for which there has been far too many of in recent years.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 23 points 1 week ago

If Doctor Who isn't woke then the showrunner's fuckin something up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (7 children)

What do we call it when the show has politics you agree with but you still think its too heavy handed and the messaging constantly feels like you're being talked down to?

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago
[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Patronising. RTD loves to be patronising because he doesn't understand subtlety.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

No effing doubt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Back in the Tom Baker era, they routinely talked of the Prime Minister as 'she.'

Those shows were made long before Thatcher came to power.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doctor Who is responsible for Margaret Thatcher? Wow, maybe this show does suck after all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 week ago

I have more criticism over Disney being involved in production than anything "woke".

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sethu and Gatwa’s pairing means that two people of color will pilot the Tardis for the first time in Doctor Who’s history. “Ncuti was like, ‘Look at us. We get to be in the Tardis. We’re going to piss off so many people’,” she said.

I know he what he means, but to be pedantic, this is not the first time a person of colour person has been in the Tardis. There have been several black companions (Mickey, Martha, Bill Potts); there have even been two people of colour as companions at the same time (Ryan and Yaz). You could even say that Martha was the first black doctor to pilot the Tardis. :P

I'm happy to see a POC Doctor and companion though.

[–] Grostleton@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Did any of those characters actually "pilot" the tardis? I remember incidents of them being "in" the tardis and it autopilots or is remotely sent away by the doc, but but never directly controlled by them in any meaningful way, though admittedly I'm a bit hazy on the Ryan/Yaz seasons at this point.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

I recall Martha operating the Tardis at one point, though she didn't know what she was doing. That might have been Rose though. Anyway, this is all pedantry lol. The new companion looks cool. Sadly the show is just so hard to watch at this point; I probably will watch one or two episodes with her anyway.

load more comments
view more: next ›