this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
578 points (96.6% liked)

Science Memes

14085 readers
3190 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] danhab99@programming.dev 117 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I read this thing's entire wiki page and it's fascinating!!

  • Imo it's not even an animal it's just a collection of cells that can survive on their own but just don't want too
  • It will rip itself into multiple parts spontaneously because cells don't coordinate too much. They don't have dedicated neurons but they have a decently complex peptide based protocol.
  • You can put a single Trichoplax animal through a sive that is fine enough not to damage the cells but separate them, and the cells will reform into the same animal
  • They can reproduce sexually but they don't have any of the markers that all males of all sexually reproducing species have. Plus because they only ever sexually reproduce when there's a high density of Trichoplaxs, it's basically a pattern of Trichoplax cells choosing to break away and combine with other cells to create new individuals.
  • They're just about as simple as e.coli and they're the simplest animals with about 50mill base pairs divided into 6 chromosomes
  • They can take the organelles of the cells they eat just because. The wiki article calls it symbiosis but that implies that organelles are alive and I don't think they are. I think Trichoplaxs can just take tools from other creatures to use.
[–] azi@mander.xyz 44 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think you misread wikipedia when it talks about its endosymbioses. Whole bacteria are found within an organlle (the endoplasmic reticulum) of Trichoplaxs.

That being said what you described does happen in a number of organisms (including 'complex' ones like nudibranchs): they steal the chloroplasts from the algae they eat in a process called kleptoplasty. Seeing as mitochondria and chloroplasts originated as bacterial endosymbionts that were then heavily integrated into their hosts, calling kleptoplasty a form of symbiosis isn't that unusual.

[–] danhab99@programming.dev 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Whole bacteria are found within an organlle

That is even more mind blowing to me

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Then I have to ask if you were aware that mitochondria were originally external, invasive organisms

[–] danhab99@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes but mitochondria live in the cytoplasm. I guess I don't have much of a grasp of size differences that small so it blew me away to think to find a life form inside of the organelle of another lifeform.. I thought things were too small at that scale.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Still fuckin crazy that they are in our DNA now.

[–] azi@mander.xyz 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Fun fact: Animal embryos can be disassociated by depriving them of calcium (E-cadherin, the molecule that holds the cells together, needs to calcium to work) and then can be allowed to reassociate by adding back calcium. If you do this in early enough stages then the embryo will function and develop normally once reaggregated, despite all the cells being jumbled up

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"peptide-based protocol" is a pretty good band name

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Cellular peptide cake with mint frosting

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you for the summary. I don't have time to go down a rabbit hole at the moment, so this was just enough to sate my curiosity until I do have time.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 4 points 2 weeks ago

ISTR you can do the sieve thing with true living sponges, too. Life on earth is wild. I wonder if it will be considered mild once we find some interesting life off-planet.

[–] clonedhuman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Fucking interesting!

[–] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 51 points 2 weeks ago
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

how it looks like

This phrase drives me crazy.

[–] Nima@leminal.space 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 41 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Valid options are:

  • What it looks like
  • How it looks

Not:

  • How it looks like
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

this is really controversial, but as long as I can understand it, I think it's ok.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 15 points 2 weeks ago

Objectively correct take. The goal of communication has been met, anything else is just pedantry.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not at all controversial, it's the rules of English grammar.

[–] stray@pawb.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The "rules" of a language describe how people use the language, but those conventions are subject to constant change because communication is a collaborative art. Some might say it's better to use a semicolon rather than a comma, for example.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

*than a comma; for example

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Because this should now include an explanation of how it's looking like it does. What is the reason it has that color, and takes that exact form? This was obviously not the point of the post.

[–] SomGye@dormi.zone 36 points 2 weeks ago

A M O G U S

[–] Caitlyynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago
[–] azi@mander.xyz 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Early animals were likely very similar to Trichoplax, but they weren't Trichoplax. Trichoplax adherins is a modern species with just as many millions of years of evolution between it and the first animal as between us and the first animal. Just bugs me when people end up implying that orthogenisis is real

[–] lath@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Yo, if our universe is just the innards of a primordial microorganism, where can we find the mitochondria?

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Get out of my head, get out of my head!!

[–] callyral@pawb.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

You like seeking patterns, don't you?

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

“Ancestors, please guide me. What should I do?”

“Blob zlorg bzz”

[–] owl@infosec.pub 6 points 2 weeks ago

There is an organism among us.

[–] pan0wski@infosec.pub 6 points 2 weeks ago
[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Gramgram is that you

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hmm.. Looks like a nebula...

[–] Object@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just recovered from the boomerang nebula :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ik5pvx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

In how many ways is this thing going to kill us?

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Trumps brain

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] azi@mander.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

No actually. If you consider the plants to be Archaeplastida (glaucophytes, red algae, and Viridiplantae) or Viridiplantae (the green algae including Embryophyta) then the common plant ancestor is unicellular (greens and reds evolved multicellularity independently). If you consider the plants to just be Embryophyta (the land plants) then they already had highly specialized cells and looked plant-like before they split off from the rest of the green algae.

I'm not sure if the fungal common ancestor is believed to have been unicellular or multicellular but if it was multicellular then it would've been filamentous like modern multicellular fungi, rather than a sheet of cells

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

Written by a Geordie like.