this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
610 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19809 readers
3359 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

These guys look like the sort of person who will spend the rest of their life bragging about this hoping it will help them get laid and not realizing it's why they can't

[–] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago

People should be careful in what they believe and trust. Musk created a belief long ago.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly how I expected them to look tbh. Just generic looking kids.

[–] Ghosthacked@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They aren't kids. They're adults that have made their decision and must deal with the blowback from the public.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

"adult" is just a word. 19 year olds are... barely adult, by my definition. I started feeling more like an adult around 30, if I'm honest. That's when my brain was like, alright, maybe I'm responsible, confident, and settled enough to have kids of my own. To take real responsibility.

Old creepy rich dudes have been exploiting young men for millennia, nothing new.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

Peter Thiel’s blood boys.

[–] unabart@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The 🥦 is strong!

Imagine thinking this is a good career move. Or haircut.

[–] Manalith@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago

This kid really out here using his haircut to advertise his dad's popcorn company.

[–] Toga77@lemmy.world 178 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Imagine being such massive pieces of shit so young.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 81 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why would that be hard to imagine?

Their brains literally aren't fully formed yet. And the prefeontal cortex is the last to develop.

Younger people will always trend towards "anti establishment" because of it, which makes a political landscape incredibly dangerous when the only two options only care about the wealthy.

The best way to prevent fascism is a pro worker socially progressive party.

Neoliberals stole that from us, then made America play Russian roulette 3x in a row with trump as the gun, and we lost twice.

[–] troed@fedia.io 33 points 2 days ago (4 children)

You need to follow @garwboy@ohai.social

Start here: https://ohai.social/@Garwboy/113944647175536159

Your brain works fine when you're under 25 (no matter how 'inconvenient' this fact may be)

In-lieu of the young guys working on Musk's behalf, the old "Your brain isn't fully developed until your 25 claim" has emerged yet again

Here's why it's BS

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Thank you. If we deny 24 year olds agency we're just stunting them. At a certain point inability to make mistakes just prevents growth. Little kids need to learn that physics doesn't care that it hurt them. Teenagers need to relearn that lesson alongside lessons of how to interact among their peers and tired hold their burgeoning freedom. People in their early 20s need the full freedom of adults who can suffer long term consequences because even if they still had maturing to do that's part of it. Rather than denying them agency maybe we should be building safety nets and saying "hey I get it I did stupid shit in my early 20s too", but also those should extend to all ages because I'm still doing stupid shit in my 30s and I don't expect to ever look back 5-10 years back and think I would make all the same choices.

[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So I agree it shouldn't be used as an excuse, but in a perfect world it would definitely be grounds for diminished responsibility. If your brain hasn't fully developed its decision making centre then you aren't on a level playing field with those whose have. And it's a fact that full development of the prefontal cortex doesn't occur until mid to late twenties. They're just not at the you-ought-to-know-better endgame, neurologically.

[–] troed@fedia.io 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

No, it's not a fact. That's the whole point.

[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So what kind of source would you accept?

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-021-01137-9

Although neurons of the PFC are generated before birth, the differentiation of its neurons and development of synaptic connections in humans extend to the 3rd decade of life.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3621648/#%3A%7E%3Atext=The+development+and+maturation+of+the+prefrontal+cortex+occurs+primarily%2Cthe+age+of+25+years.

The development and maturation of the prefrontal cortex occurs primarily during adolescence and is fully accomplished at the age of 25 years.

https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/the-teen-brain-7-things-to-know

The brain finishes developing and maturing in the mid-to-late 20s.

It seems to me that there is a scientific consensus on the subject.

[–] troed@fedia.io 1 points 3 hours ago

Maybe read the link I posted? All the research on "25 years" stems from that being the cutoff year. The same developments continue throughout life.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think that was a good read. I think the problem I have is that if I look back at my 20 year old self or my 23-year-old self, I see someone that was extremely self assured but had almost 0 real world experience or context for decision-making about very important things.

I think it is disingenuous to absolve them of all blame, but I don't think it's inappropriate to say that it's not surprising that they are young men given how easy it would be for someone who should be a role model to influence them. Elon Musk's team is young so he can control them

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

That's just growing and maturing as a person. You're never supposed to stop.

I agree it's insane to put people that young in charge of the government, but it's not biology, it's inexperience. It's the same reason you don't put someone who just graduated college in charge of projects with life or death consequences regardless of whether they're 22 or 52.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 75 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hmmmmm.... Some of those faces look a bit DEI to this proud American. At least they're all males.

[–] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 51 points 2 days ago

DEI, all of them. They look like being assigned male at birth, but have obviously all transitioned into massive cunts.

[–] inconel@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Chairman Musk's Red Guards. His totally genius thinking spinned ground breaking innovative way to push authoritarian scheme using gullible youth.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago

Oh look, Elon groomed little boys who could have gone on to do something great.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And one who does is trying to cash in on his new job by charging people to read his Substack entry which boast, “Why DOGE: Why I gave up a seven-figure salary to save America.”

LOL

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really look forward to all 6 behind bars in a few years. I wonder if they know the level of treason they are committing?

There are a lot of steps before that happens. They are much more likely to end up killed than imprisoned by the looks of things.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Some opportunistic idiots who seemingly don't have anything to lose and can be ditched by Elon as scapegoats if the need arises. I almost sure he groomed them with the myth of him being self-made billionaire and provided them a fabulous opportunity to join him. I'm almost sure they aren't kids anymore, but also that they don't know how to crime and that they need a plan B. In the musical chairs game they are likely to fall on their asses once the music stops.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scarilog@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

"Good Squad" is peak headline. They do look like a bunch of gooners.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 2 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SandraBollocks@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Nazi squad.

Remember, he did the salute. Twice.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be clear, this is a legit article so it stays, but no threats of Luigi here guys, lemmy can't afford the attention.

See:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/02/03/martin-supports-for-musk-doge/

[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 2 days ago

It will be fine we will all get Jan 6th pardons.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 45 points 2 days ago
[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Not even old enough for their car insurance to have dropped yet

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Funny, i expected their shirts to be browner.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›