politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
You need to follow @garwboy@ohai.social
Start here: https://ohai.social/@Garwboy/113944647175536159
Thank you. If we deny 24 year olds agency we're just stunting them. At a certain point inability to make mistakes just prevents growth. Little kids need to learn that physics doesn't care that it hurt them. Teenagers need to relearn that lesson alongside lessons of how to interact among their peers and tired hold their burgeoning freedom. People in their early 20s need the full freedom of adults who can suffer long term consequences because even if they still had maturing to do that's part of it. Rather than denying them agency maybe we should be building safety nets and saying "hey I get it I did stupid shit in my early 20s too", but also those should extend to all ages because I'm still doing stupid shit in my 30s and I don't expect to ever look back 5-10 years back and think I would make all the same choices.
So I agree it shouldn't be used as an excuse, but in a perfect world it would definitely be grounds for diminished responsibility. If your brain hasn't fully developed its decision making centre then you aren't on a level playing field with those whose have. And it's a fact that full development of the prefontal cortex doesn't occur until mid to late twenties. They're just not at the you-ought-to-know-better endgame, neurologically.
No, it's not a fact. That's the whole point.
So what kind of source would you accept?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-021-01137-9
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3621648/#%3A%7E%3Atext=The+development+and+maturation+of+the+prefrontal+cortex+occurs+primarily%2Cthe+age+of+25+years.
https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/the-teen-brain-7-things-to-know
It seems to me that there is a scientific consensus on the subject.
Maybe read the link I posted? All the research on "25 years" stems from that being the cutoff year. The same developments continue throughout life.
I think that was a good read. I think the problem I have is that if I look back at my 20 year old self or my 23-year-old self, I see someone that was extremely self assured but had almost 0 real world experience or context for decision-making about very important things.
I think it is disingenuous to absolve them of all blame, but I don't think it's inappropriate to say that it's not surprising that they are young men given how easy it would be for someone who should be a role model to influence them. Elon Musk's team is young so he can control them
That's just growing and maturing as a person. You're never supposed to stop.
I agree it's insane to put people that young in charge of the government, but it's not biology, it's inexperience. It's the same reason you don't put someone who just graduated college in charge of projects with life or death consequences regardless of whether they're 22 or 52.
That feeling never goes away. I'm 50 and consider the 40yo me to have lacked plenty.
Any line thus becomes quite arbitrary. The point is that there really isn't anything that supports the trope about "not grown until 25".
I do not give weight to words spelled wrong.