So now there will finally be wage equality. All the previous males will be getting a 23% pay cut.
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
1578 points (97.8% liked)
Political Memes
5875 readers
3523 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but donβt intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Donβt post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My man-tits now make a lot more sense. I think I'm going to make a stellar addition to the female gender. I'm off to find a local bar with a ladies night. See you there my fellow ladies.
What I understand about the "intention of the text" is that:
- XY: male.
- XX: female.
People who's body or mind don't match with their genes would then be a male or a female with one or a combination of hormonal, developmental, or psychological issues.
What I understand about the βintention of the textβ is that:
That's probably the intention, but because it was written by somebody with zero academic biological experience that is also trying to cosplay as a professional writing a rigorous definition, it fails to do so.
XY: male. XX: female.
Would you like to hear a crazy secret? We biologists don't use the words "gender" and "sex" separately because we feel like it, there is a major difference between the too. Want to hear something even crazier? We don't use "XY = male!" as our definition either.
People whoβs body or mind donβt match with their genes
Huh... where else do you think their traits come from? Their soul? Their zodiac sign? Your phenotype is nothing but your genes + regulated expression from the environment.
then be a male or a female with one or a combination of hormonal, developmental, or psychological issues
Are blond people just a male or female with a developmental issue in their hair's pigmentation? Or for this specific category of human diversity you're okay with calling them what they are rather than trying to define what wild type genomic expression is the "correct"? I mean, a person with XY chromosomes but a mutated SRY gene would develop entirely as a female, your worldview seems to imply that's "hormonal and developmental issues!" but then I'd love to hear your views on race - or in fact, I would much rather not hear them, if they follow the same logic as your initial proposition.
While we are here, how about the XY individuals with a working SRY gene that physically develop as male, but have certain neural activation patterns only found in women and that swear they were born in the wrong body from a very young age? Why exactly are we going to discard the biological evidence to their subjective perception, just because it makes you uncomfortable? Because if that's the case, maybe your subjectivity makes me uncomfortable... should we start listing and denying aspects of your physiology too?
Jesus Christ, chill, my dude. I was just explaining what I understand/interpret from the text and its context, not endorsing anything...
My gosh, I am escaping from Reddit precisely because of this aggressive behavior... This is literally my first day in this platform and I get sarcasm and hostility right away.
What about:
XYY?
XXY?
XXX?
They are certainly fascinating exceptions, but I am not educated enough in the subject to have a strong opinion. I was just sharing what I interpret from the text posted.
Really, Iβm a lady now? How so?
β¦ Whatβs the point of commenting when you didnβt even bother to read the post?
Maybe just donβt get it oh well
Trump declares ~~himself~~ herself the first female President of the USA? π³
(Edit: Excuse me Mrs. President, I had misgendered you.)
He's so petty he had to steal that title from both Hilary and Kamala it just took him this long...
load more comments
(6 replies)
Technically no. They aren't male or female, they're undifferentiated. Since we're neither male nor female at conception, this order means males and females don't actually exist at all.
Get out of here with that big science speak that isn't allowed in American now
load more comments
(27 replies)
I think this is actually more gender abolitionist if you think about it. No one is producing reproductive cells/gametes at conception. They begin by producing undifferentiated stem cells that will later specialize into all of the other cell types.
Male and female now officially retired. Rejoice!
MAGA: "truth and science needs to bow to holy scripture!"
The Bible: "For in Christ there is.. neither male nor female..." (Galatians 3:28)
MAGA: "wait, not like that!"
load more comments
(5 replies)
Turns out they were always asking, "What is a woman?" because they had no idea either.
load more comments
(6 replies)
I didn't consider this option, but it seems to be an easy fix to the whole gender thing. Everyone is female. period. *(no pun intended)
Own that period joke. You conceived it, whether accidental or not, so you should carry it to term.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Silly Matthew, still believing that words written by Trump's administration mean anything...
Same mistake many opponents of the Nazis made in the beginning.
Fascists don't play by the rules, whatever they say or write only has meaning as long as it benefits them.
When you point out inconsistencies in what they wrote yesterday, they laugh at you. And then they shoot you.
Listen I get that these people have never taken a science class, but I damn well know at least some of them watched Jurassic Park.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's cool and all to dunk on their logical fallacies, but don't think for one second that their poor wording will stop them from enacting untold violence against trans people.
load more comments
(1 replies)
...that's not how that works.
Early stages of development are bipotential, which means they could develop either way, they're not initially female.
Around 6-7 weeks, if carrying a Y chromosome carrying the gene SRY, they develop into testes. If there are two X chromosomes, then ovaries develop.
load more comments
(16 replies)
Now, I'm not gonna disagree with this but I reckon it's a bit confusing to be changed so suddenly.
Can we have an adaptation period? It's gonna be tough to break the habit in such short notice.
view more: next βΊ