this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
286 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

61758 readers
3526 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 124 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The laws of robotics:

  1. A robot shall never harm a human, or through inaction allow a human to come to harm.
  2. Fuck other robots though. Fuck them right up.
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

First glance I thought that was One Must Fall: 2097, but turns out below it doesn't even get close to that epic level.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

To be fair, given its legacy now as one of the worst one-on-one fighting games in the history of the universe, Rise of the Robots probably wishes it was One Must Fall.

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, that reminds me I wanted to replay that game.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 87 points 1 month ago (5 children)

As it turns out, the impact wasn't too severe. The Waymo cab, to its credit, hit the brakes immediately and avoided knocking the poor little thing over. And moments later, while the robotaxi is still in a daze, the Serve robot drives away like nothing happened.

Smash seems to be overselling it.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They had hot, angry robot sex afterward

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For revenge or for reconciliation?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago
[–] RCTreeFiddy@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

It appears the video may have been sped up in the part just before the impact. I would like to see the unedited clip, I bet it was way less severe than it looked.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds like a good time to use the word "bump"

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Maybe even "boop".

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

The word "slam" has been reserved for headlines of someone giving minor criticism, can't use that unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There should be an open communication standard that all robots use to communicate with each other.

And it will only be used for good and nothing nefarious.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago

There should be an open communication standard that all robots use to communicate with each other.

Yes!

And it will only be used for good and nothing nefarious.

Oh no

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How about if we had sixteen different proprietary such protocols instead?

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We’d need a seventeenth unifying protocol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aside from the obvious I, Robot movie allusion, this idea doesn't really work in the real world because robots have to be able to detect the presence and anticipate the actions of non-robots anyway. Unless you're willing to ban all the actual people from the street, which is unreasonable, robot-to-robot communication doesn't actually help you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Little robot crossed against the signal, and couldn't navigate the curb, big robot cali rolled the right turn and didn't yield to the pedestrian walk way. What a shit show. Glad it wasn't someone in a wheel chair.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (6 children)

So what we're saying is, this is it, folks. We've finally reached robot parity with exactly how humans would behave in the same situation.

Not quite.

We'd need the waymo cab to start screaming about how the robot just jumped right out in front of it, and how they should stay the hell out of the way.

Then we'll have reached parity.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

and didn't yield to the pedestrian walk way.

The Waymo is guilty.

The scene was clearly visible and it hit the brake much too late at that speed.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago (5 children)

video of it on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hazFkED40KI if you don't want to go to reddit through the linked page

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

You call that a smash? Stop sensationalising, come now.

A car gently tapped a thing during a turn and came to a stop.

[–] Valorie12@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Begun, the robot wars have.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

The future is now!

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I see nobody talking about this, but aren't the Waymo(s) trained on data which most likely did not include these robots yet?

It seems like this is just something that'll probably happen a lot whenever something new is introduced on the roads.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know about the equipment of Waymo cars, but I would be surprised if they didn't have LIDARs or some other form of distance based environment detection.

And that should be sufficient to implement basic obstacle detection. You don't need to use machine learning if you can use sensors telling you that "something is too close".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BritishJ@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well, they should try to avoid any object in the road to be honest. Imagine a new toy comes out that a child is on. Sorry we killed that child l, we didn't train it on that new toy.

Its just an unacceptable answer to be honest.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That is also very true.

It's not a Tesla so I'm sure they are investigating the cause.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Expect reCaptcha to ask you to identify food delivery robots soon.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Wouldn't be surprised tbh.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

but aren't the Waymo(s) trained on data which most likely did not include these robots yet?

You can say that about nearly 100% of humans as well.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So I'm finding it hard to find a release date for humans, but I'm fairly sure they predated the invention of self-driving cars.

For example I seem to remember being alive in the 1990s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lemminnewbie2@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

I hate seeing this kind of bot on bot crime

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 15 points 1 month ago

We'll win the robot wars by pitting them against each other.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Where were you during the robot wars of 2025?

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago

This new season of Robot Wars / Battle Bots is starting strong

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago

The shadow wars

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 4 points 1 month ago

That was personal, there's definitely some beef between them.

load more comments
view more: next ›