this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
231 points (97.9% liked)

politics

24709 readers
2687 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Matt Gaetz running the justice department. Fox hosts in charge of the Pentagon and transportation. Elon Musk as head of layoffs. And Robert F Kennedy Jr and Dr Oz overseeing the nation’s health.

Some have likened Donald Trump’s administrative picks to a clown car; others are calling our incoming leadership a kakistocracy, or “government by the worst people”, as Merriam-Webster puts it.

The word has been trending online, with a burst in search traffic in recent weeks and a new dedicated subreddit. It’s not the first time Trump has (accidentally) made the term famous; many discovered it in his first term. But the kakistocracy of 2016 looks like Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood compared with the president-elect’s new batch of sidekicks.

MBFC
Archive

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 37 points 7 months ago (4 children)

according to computer security experts, the US presidential election was likely hacked via voting software.

The numbers Trump achieved are non-credible.

https://www.planetcritical.com/p/cyber-security-experts-warn-election-hacked

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So there is evidence to justify a recount, but will that actually happen? What are the chances?

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

very little action needs to be taken by the people in those States to convince their secretary of State to do a manual recount, or people in other states to ask their secretary of State to pressure the soss in other states to do a recount.

legislation is often supported or not based on less than 100 people calling into their legislator's office, so the more people calling up their secretaries of state and election officials and demanding a recount, the better.

this is not a baseless accusation, there is hard evidence that Trump's lawyers had voting software, and a historical and statistical and probability that The voters that literally want Trump. the election are real or actually voted.

The likelihood is that those ballots are not there.

with this much actual evidence, there must be a recount.

you should demand it.

call or email your election officials. tell me your state and I'll tell you who to call or email.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

get em, you're a legend.

Contact Info State Elections Division

Email elections@sos.wa.gov

Telephone (360) 902-4180 (800) 448-4881

Fax (360) 664-4619

Mail PO Box 40229 Olympia, WA 98504-0229

https://www2.sos.wa.gov/elections/contactinfo.aspx

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just emailed the link you gave me. I've done what I can. At this time, anyway.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

awesome, thank you, it does make a difference.

a manual recount seems in order and not a huge ask.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Democrats will roll over.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The sad thing - even if this were to be true, I bet nothing happens. Just look at Bush v. Gore. Even many so-called Democrats and so-called liberals pretend as if Bush won, that anyone bringing it up is just a sore loser and so on. More recently, we have the Russia and Comey thing when it comes to Hillary.

Even if we later have the smoking gun about this, I bet we still sustain damage from donvict and his buddies in the meantime, and people still act like it's NBD, even if true...

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I mean the voting software stolen is undeniably true, since they admitted doing it themselves and there's evidence of Trump's lawyers hiring people to steal the voting software.

nothing might come of it, but I still talk about how W stole his election because his brother was the governor of florida and stopped ballot counting in that state, so if this election was stolen, we might as well have indisputable proof like we have of Florida in 2004.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ya accidentally put California the first time instead of Florida, theres no way in hell California would elect a Bush mostly cause they are from out of state.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

thank you, I was walking down the street and doing speech to text wildly gesticulating and didn't check after I talked, haha

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Aight no problem.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Start by contacting the relevant people and demanding a manual recount.

If you can say that you actually tried, and still nothing happened, then you're allowed to wallow in despair.

But you don't get to just skip straight to the despair part without the doing everything you can part. Then the only source of your despair will be you.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

First "open letter" is bunk. Second looks a bit more legit. The second cites cause for concern not evidence of an actual hack.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Spoonamore is not a security expert. He’s an attention-seeker who is known for making news with unfounded claims and little else.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you don't like that guy, you you can look to all the other security experts that are calling for a manual recount.

incidentally, spoonamore isn't known for making that claim every election, he's made it twice, The other time was in 2004 when ballot interference occurred.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Look I’d be happy with a recount. I think they should recount, just to be as sure as possible. What I’m not OK with are conspiracy theories and lies.

2004 when ballot interference occurred

I was there in 2004. Lots of conspiracy theories were pumped on the blogs that were ultimately unfounded. If I recall, Stephen’s “expert claim” pertained to Ohio and that claim was spurious.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_United_States_election_voting_controversies

The steal in Florida was real but it came in the form of a phone call, not a software exploit.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

these are the facts Jack, and facts don't care if you don't like them.

also, conspiracy does not equal untrue.

a conspiracy is a group of people planning to carry out or carrying out a scheme.

that happens in the real world everyday.

it's fine if you don't like that one guy, ignore that one guy.

Focus on all of the other computer security experts stating that because of trumps lawyers admitting they hired a group to steal voting machine software, and their stated intention to interfere with the election, we should do a manual count to make sure that all the ballots are legitimate.

you can ignore that one guy and listen to all the other scientists you don't have a problem, who you claim to agree with, with who have 19 credible sources supporting the electoral obligation for a manual ballot count.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Trump should google Caesar. I don't mean the normal "How far Lil Caesar from Trump?" or "Trump own Ceasar Hotel?" or "Why smart man say me eat no Caesar?"

Surrounding yourself around the corrupt lead to dangrous games. Caesar found to late.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He was definitely a corrupt war criminal, like any president, but Caesar was murdered because of his radical approach to helping the populare at the detriment of the oligarchy. I don't think Trump has that to worry about

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 7 months ago

No, but heavy is the head. He will try to break his leash and the people around will look for more power. "For the love of money is the root of all evil."

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He's left behind even the pretense of having people who know things in office. Now it's just bootlickers who have been on TV, and the occasional particularly toadycore politician.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Yup. He knows how to sell shit to gullible rubes. He's a dumb fuck otherwise, but the man has an uncanny genius when it comes to self promotion.

[–] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

"1880 was also a general election year in the UK, another country known for its contributions to the English language."

Hilarious

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I wasn't aware of any of this, I swear:

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

He had to pick these guys. He tried to put the others in jail or in the ground, so they don't want to play with him. He's assembled the best team he has available to him, and I'm just curious who is really making the selections here. I'd lay even money it's the friendovich but we'll never know.

But trust him: he could not do any better than these guys.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I saw an article that called it a "Broligarchy" and that seemed to fit more than anything else.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

KKKakistocracy

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They’re both a kakistocracy and a kekistocracy

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

...and a kleptocracy.

Oh look - 3 "K"'s