633

Sophia Rosing was banned from the University of Kentucky campus after the incident

A college student who went on a drunken tirade using the n-word 200 times will now head to jail for a year.

Sophia Rosing, a former student at the University of Kentucky, became infamous in 2022 for her rant that was captured on video and shared on social media. In the video, Rosing was caught using the slur at a fellow student and assaulting her.

Rosing previously pleaded guilty to four counts of fourth-degree assault and other charges. When she entered her plea, she apologized to fellow student Kylah Spring and members of the Black community.

This week, a judge in Kentucky sentenced Rosing to 12 months in custody and 100 hours of community service, according to Lex 18.

In the infamous video Spring said that Rosing struck her numerous times and kicked her in the stomach. As Spring is explaining what happened to her, Rosing can be heard yelling at her in the background, calling the Black student the n-word and a "b****" throughout the footage.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

I'll never get the American mindset which considers "used the n-word 200 times" the main offense, the one worthy to be in the headline, while "struck her numerous times and kicked her in the stomach" is just a minor detail that happens to be mentioned somewhere in the article as an afterthought.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 142 points 1 day ago

Watch her get out in a year and be invited to go on the Republican lecture circuit to talk about how woke politics is ruining American college campuses.

This isn't a joke, I seriously think this will happen.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 18 points 23 hours ago

A whole year? Somebody is optimistic.

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 4 points 19 hours ago

Yeah she was probably a good Christian too

[-] donuts@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

!remindme 1 year

(we need this bot! I have no programming knowledge or skills but I'm going to make this happen one way or another)

there is a way:

@remindme@mstdn.social 1 year

[-] donuts@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

I don't see anything.. Does it work?

yes, you get a PM from the bot :-)

[-] donuts@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It should just post a reply and offer a link for people to also subscribe to the same reminder. But I'm not complaining, just talking in ideal scenarios

[-] Carrick1973@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

She's pretty and blond and an idiot. She'll be on Fox News as a host shortly after.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

At this point, i genuinely trust that could be a realistic outcome. That episode may have been her very own Rittenhouse Moment™ putting her on conservative radars across the country

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

I would imagine that is her plan all along

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The woke liberals are trying to cancel her for the innocent act of being a racist asshole who assaulted a black woman! They're out of control!

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 82 points 1 day ago

Imagine saying the n-word 100 times in an assault on someone and only being halfway done. 😬

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

how long was the assault? That's like dozens of hard Rs per minute. What a psycho.

[-] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

10 minutes. That's 3 per second.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago

How was this not elevated to a hate crime? That sentance is weak sauce for a racially motivated attack

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

It's hard not to just be blunt here. She's a white girl. Sentencing guidelines and police protocols are different for people matching that description. It's a known, researched phenomenon.

It's not unreasonable to say that the police work for non-impoverished, non-overweight white women. It's noticeable in how quick white women are to call the police and think the police will help with a problem.

Statistically, you are roughly about 1000% more likely to experience police violence if you are not a white woman.

[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It's not really for being a white girl, it's primarily for being a girl.

Women get 63% lighter sentences for the same crimes as men ( https://academic.oup.com/aler/article-abstract/17/1/127/212179 ), while there is no racial gap between white and another race, whether among men, or women, that's even half that wide ( https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/2023-demographic-differences-federal-sentencing ).

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 19 hours ago

It's both. The criminal justice system treats white folks better than black folks, and women better than men. Depending on what exactly you're measuring which one is the larger gap can go either way. For sentencing, sex means more than race - so she'd get a longer sentence if she were a black woman, but an even longer one if she were a white man, and a still longer one if she were a black man.

I'm actually surprised a white girl got a whole year for an assault. And not even a suspended sentence!

I've seen cases where it's like "white woman stabs boyfriend in heart, boyfriend narrowly survives due to prompt medical attention, 30 day suspended sentence" or "woman sexually assaults minor boy, gets herself pregnant from the assault, no punishment for her and boy owes woman child support for being her victim."

[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

It’s both.

Holy shit lol, I know it's both! I never said it's not both. I'm just pointing out the common misconception, that people tend to assume the wrong one of the two is statistically a bigger factor. And not just bigger, but much bigger.

“woman sexually assaults minor boy, gets herself pregnant from the assault, no punishment for her and boy owes woman child support for being her victim.”

In case anyone thinks this person is being hyperbolic here: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/

[-] 01011@monero.town 14 points 1 day ago

Her being white is most certainly a factor. Racial judicial bias is definitely a thing. When you add in gender judicial bias you end with a tap on the wrist for a most egregious crime.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That is apparently determined at sentencing in Kentucky.

https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/statutes/statute.aspx?id=45774

So blame the judge.

[-] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 92 points 1 day ago

Anyone else getting serious larval-stage-Marjorie-Taylor-Greene vibes from this mug shot or just me?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 120 points 1 day ago

Interesting that the Independent made sure to mention that this student was drunk not once, but twice, as if that were an excuse.

No one says that word when drunk if they wouldn't be willing to say it out loud in certain company.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Her being drunk is relevant to reporting the truth. They're not excusing her actions but giving context. As you pointed out, she may never have said these slurs in her open life, but she was probably thinking them and alcohol greased the wheels on her racism.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Talk about White Washing a story.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 20 points 1 day ago

When is she gonna be invited to headline a Trump rally?

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 80 points 1 day ago

I'm very confused here. She is white, pretty, and went before a Kentucky Judge. How was she sentenced to anything?

~/s~

[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 day ago

You're asking the right questions. Not rich enough, apparently

[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

I guess he was rich enough for 150 slurs, but she had to cross the limit.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

However, Spring said after the plea hearing that she did not believe Rosing was remorseful.

Yeah, I can look at that mugshot and tell she's not. Glad (and surprised) she got actual punishment.

Edit: I'm making the assumption that's the reflection of a bright orange jumper I see at the bottom of the photo, and the typical blandly colored cinderblock wall in the background.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

That is the sort of smug little smirk that says, "that n- deserved what she got." No remorse at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pyflixia@kbin.melroy.org 27 points 1 day ago

You know they say that drinking alcohol kind of reveals who you are inside. Well we now know who she really is. The assault confirms that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] don@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

All that hideousness and just gets a year of jail and 100 hours of community service. Fucking Kentucky pantywaist conservative judge.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago

It's like 4 minutes of straight up repeating the n-word. Besides her racism, how fucked up she was to vomit out that long of a manifesto?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good. I remember seeing that video back when this all happened and she’s a vile piece of shit.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
633 points (98.8% liked)

News

23200 readers
3021 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS