Postmortal_Pop

joined 2 years ago
[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

My 3d printer is half 3d printed and a fourth recycled garbage. I've laid hands on every single part in her and hopefully soon I'll replace the box as a whole with a vintage tv cabinet and finally put a 30cm heated bed in her. The only thing I can't replace is the thermistor because I don't know how to program for a modem one.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

That's literally my point. It's wholly possible to make an llm for this, but I suspect when you look at the llm in this toy it will just be a bootleg version of chat gpt.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Indeed, you are as wise as you are seductive. An Scolar among testudinidae.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

That's kind of the existing issue I have with them. At their root, the LLMs are trained off of unfiltered internet and DMs harvested from social platforms. This means that regardless of the way you use it, all of them contain a sizable lexicon for explicit and abusive behaviour. The only reason you don't see it in every single AI is because the put a bot between it and you that checks the messages and redirects the bad stuff. It's like putting a t rex in your cattle pen and paying a guy to whack it or the cows if they get too close to each other.

The only way around this would be to manually vet everything fed into the llm to exclude any of this and since the idea is already not turning a profit, the cost of that would be far beyond what anyone is willing to do. So I'm not impressed that this toy is doing exactly what it's expected to do under laboratory scrutiny. I'd be more impressed if they actually told people why this keeps happening instead of fear mongering it.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Absolutely not, but I would like to see how the study got this information from the bot. Don't get me wrong, I have my own sold reasoning for why llm in toys is not ok, but it's disengenuous to say these toys are the problem if the researcher had to coax dark info out of it.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Free isn't cheap enough to support her bullshit.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wow, that's not the word I wanted right there.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, fixed it lol

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What's a ship that never sinks? Friendship!

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

I know lingua franca, what are the other* two specific things?

Oh I should look into that. I've been using mine for years and honestly thought it'd happen sooner but I guess I'm not pretty enough to be cyber stalked.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

"Remember that one video where the guy stuck a dong to a 4th floor window? How do we market that to families?"

 

It started as a world building thing and ended up complete enough to actually play. It's a bit like chess but with tiles placed to make the field and a pog like betting system. Everyone I've shown it to tells me I need to publish it, but I have no idea how. Any one here have suggestions?

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
view more: next ›