756
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] discusseded@programming.dev 15 points 2 months ago

This is amazing. Far better than killing them off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago

On the one hand this is creepy as hell

On the other fuck mosquitoes

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Great. First science was making the frogs gay. Now it's turning the mosquitos trans.

What's next? Lesbian amoebas? Pansexual algae? Non-binary seahorses?

Has science gone too far?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] socsa@piefed.social 13 points 2 months ago

Do vegans support this because it prevents mosquitoes from consuming animal flesh, or do they oppose it because it denies the mosquitoes their nature?

[-] Ma10gan@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 months ago

It's nuanced because it could reduce suffering overall, but it could also disrupt ecosystems in ways we can't predict and cause even more suffering. I think the latter is more likely. People have a tendency to paint animals they don't like as insignificant to the ecosystem, but they're nearly always incorrect. Wasps, for instance, are important pollinators, even if they do sting, and mosquitoes are an important food source, even if they are deadly. Anyone who advocates for eradicating species like these is doing so through a biased lens. We are nowhere near the point, technologically or scientifically, that we'd be safe playing god with the natural world like this -- especially not with the massive damage we've already caused to the environment. Someday? Maybe. But not right now.

I do also find it horrific to forcibly alter a mosquito's body so she can't express her natural behaviors. After all -- mosquitoes may cause harm, but they lack the capacity for moral reasoning, and thus cannot be evil. Thus, they don't "deserve" any kind of torment. But my personal discomfort with this isn't a moral argument.

So, uh, that's my take on it as a vegan.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sirico@feddit.uk 12 points 2 months ago

Cleanse the followers of Nurgle!

DIE, DIE, DIE

[-] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago

Why not just eradicate them? Genuine question. I don't think they serve any purpose in nature and are just pissing off every living being.

[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

They absolutely serve purpose in nature, they are a significant food source for bats and many other insects and males are pollinators.

[-] Kellamity@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

Putting aside questions of ecosystems etc, I think the main reason is that we just can't - ironic since we seem to be extint-ing all the other animals

In South America they tried in the 50s and 60s, and more kept cropping up. They breed so quickly, if you miss an area they can just rebound. Then more can come in on ships and stuff

So you couldn't really localise it, it would have to be a huge global undertaking. And it would likely require widespread use of pesticides that are at best tricksy and at worst illegal, not to mention environmentally shitty

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] amzd@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

They need blood to procreate so the method in the post does exactly what you are asking for

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

"Sheen, this is the 7th week in a row you've shown CRISPR modifications to the mosquito genome to curb malaria in class"

Comments are all the same as when they made mosquitos infertile, unable to spread malaria or wingless too.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

We gave a mosquito gender dysphoria?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

We genetically engineered mosquitoes to have gender dysmorphia - weird times.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago

They are turning the ~~frogs gay~~ mosquitoes trans!

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

I'd like to see any scientific study that reassures at least a little that this won't have terrible ramifications for ecosystems and the food chain.

We know too little, we are shortsighted and we have a bad record of intervening with nature.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 9 points 2 months ago

I get the caution about unintended consequences but damnit of all the crazy planetary issues we're dealing with right now, I'd rank

"oops, got rid of West Nile and Malaria as well as annoying little red bumps from wandering too far from big cities"

As a win, the consequences of which we can probably figure out how to deal with when we come to it.

I know it doesn't work that way but I'd trade all the world's mosquitoes to keep the polar bears or pangolins or something any day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I had a fruit fly problem over the summer and felt guilty about the cruelty of the glue traps. But when it comes to mosquitos, roaches, and wasps, I'm Hitler. I would favor genetic alterations that expanded their capacity for suffering.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] andshit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

LOL FUCK EM

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
756 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

11414 readers
1373 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS