86

Is there some connection to the nation?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 158 points 1 month ago
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 month ago

I'd assumed it was a reference to machine learning.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[-] VulKendov@reddthat.com 10 points 1 month ago

I think you're thinking of Lennon-McCartney

[-] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 5 points 1 month ago

Shut the fuck up Donny! V.I. Lenin. Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hey! No you're not. This is the walrus.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It's hard to imagine someone's been active on Lemmy for a year and didn't know that...

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago

I had no idea about this, and I’ve been here for just over a year. Also, keep in mind which community this is.

[-] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

I don’t think I’ve ever questioned it before. There’s so many servers I don’t bother to know the history behind them all.

[-] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I literally thought it was for militant, because that’s how they come off over there if you’re not 100% in lockstep with them.

Like they were fighting the man or something.

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com 62 points 1 month ago

No, theyre marxist-leninists. Basically, unironic communists.

[-] Delta_V@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

who are, ironically, not communist

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago

Marx wasnt a communist? Ive heard a lot of "not true communism" takes, but thats a new one.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Probably because you haven't read much on the subject. Marxist theory speculated on how societies and economies could transition into communism. He and others created the philosophy and Concepts involving it. But were not communist strictly speaking. At least not in anything other than the state of the individual.

Engles, and Lenin mistakenly thought that by replacing the authority and power of the wealthy with their own people. That they themselves would not fall to the corruption of power. And eventually over time the authoritarian state would somehow magically wither and die. Leaving them with a classless stateless society. Keep that in mind that is important for understanding whether something is communist or not.

Was Russia classless or stateless? No Russia was a state. And they had plenty of different classes. ML never eliminated that. In fact all the current Russian oligarchs have direct ties back to the political Elite of Soviet russia. And instead of transitioning into a communist Society they've transitioned into fascism.

Now let's look at china. Is China a state? Yes. Not communist then. Are there different classes of people in china? Yes not communist then. Their claim on even socialism is somewhat tenuous at best. But they are definitely not communist. And at this rate will never transition into communism. Xi Jinping has moved into the Emperor's Palace and is all but Emperor in name only at this point. He and his wealthy friends will never relinquish power to transition to communism. They will stay as they are until he dies. And then there will be a power vacuum. There may be some in fighting but someone will replace him and China will continue on until there there is another Revolution to replace the failed Communist Revolution that put them in power. Are they transition into open fascism as well.

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago

I saw this explanation a long time ago on reddit, and Im stealing it.

There are two types of communism. The communism in theory and communism as practiced.

Most people talk about communism as practiced. Think the USSR, China, Argentina, Cuba, any "state capitalism" country. This is how any attempt at communism will end. This is due tobthe fact that there isnt a mechanism to go from the tyranny of the proles to true communism, so you get stuck in tyranny.

Youre talking about communism the theory. Communism the theory can not exist. Its fine to discuss it, but saying that communism the theory is the only true communism is just being obtuse and/or disingenuous.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They talk about it like that because that is how the propaganda both Pro and against talk about it. The fact is Soviet Russia and China started out basically as forms of marxist leninism. They aspired to be communist but weren't. But they loved the word. And used it a lot. It's like Nazis having socialist in the name. It didn't make them socialist.

Practicing communists? Look towards communes. They are the only groups actually practicing communism. Whether they were the hippie communes Bohemian communes etc. Those are what communism in general would look like. Not explicitly but overall. Each commune is its own group that governs itself but could cooperate with similar outside groups. Soviet Russia and China were never communist in any sense.

[-] aasatru@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago

This is where people mess up when they judge the past in the eyes of the present. Communism in Marx' time had nothing to do with the Soviet Union, Mao or China.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 3 points 1 month ago

Question: Do you think that stateless and classless society is sustainable and won't evolve into a regular one?

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

In terms of modern ideological dogmaticism? No. Pragmatically I think it's possible to get very close. History has proven that. "Class" has never been a necessary construct. It's always negative, hurtful, and exclusionary. Statewise, it's always been more against nation state and to smaller extents even city-states. Large overarching structures. Keep in mind I'm coming out this from an actual Dejacque libertarian / anarco communist leftist perspective. Governance isn't the enemy. Just large overpowerful bodies with concentrated power.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago

Lenin isn't Marxism. Stalin isn't Marxism. Mao isn't Marxism. Tankies aren't Marxism. Marx would have thought nothing good of China and Russia. Marxist Leninists idolize Mao and Stalin. They think police states are the bees' knees

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

"socialism with Chinese characteristics" (the "Chinese characteristics" are capitalism)

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Marx also wasn’t Marxist; that distinction belonged to Engels & co.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Tbf to your first example, if .ml "stands for" marxist-leninist, I'm not sure lenin is a prime example lol.

[-] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

I think the meaning is that the Lemmy.ml fascists aren't actually communist.

[-] Kaboom@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

Oh, that makes much more sense. Thanks!

[-] CyberTailor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

"What is certain is that if they are Marxists, then I myself am not a Marxist"

– Karl Marx

[-] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Of course Marx wasn't a communist. He was a Marxist. Duh.

[-] ReeSilva@bolha.forum 3 points 1 month ago

How do you not know? He literally wrote a book about not to be a communist called The MaNOfest of the ComunNOst Party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

A lot of it isn't actually communists, but a facade for spreading authoritarian propaganda.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

This is true. As long as a country declares itself to be economically left, they will defend every single authoritarian action and human rights abuse. Doesn't matter if the reality is that the state capitalist country produces hundreds of billionaires. Any claim of leftist economics and they will defend anything it does. It's clear they love defending authoritarianism more than they like leftist economics.

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

they love defending authoritarianism more than they like leftist economics.

They're not paid to like leftist economics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 40 points 1 month ago

Mali didn't claim their country TLD for a long time, some dude named Johannes Zuurbier decided to just hand out domains to anyone who wanted them, for gratis unless your traffic was super high (and even then asked to only cover the traffic costs). He did this in his spare time for the community. This all further appealed to Marxist-Lenists.

Now it's managed by the government of Mali, they still give them out for gratis/very cheap.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

That's some lore

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And I think they used to be free.

[-] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago

Can’t remember the specifics but the Mali government was allowing free (or super cheap) use for awhile so that was the reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago
[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Interestingly some instances got shut down by the Mali govt, no idea why this one gets to stay

[-] pop@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

The .ml ccTLD was on a contract to a company called Freenom in the Netherlands until last year, then it went back to the Mali government. Freenom gave away domains for free until then. After the switch, the owners who didn't outright buy it lost their domains.

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Before Lemmy, ML always meant machine learning to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Fwiw, I don't think the connection to communism was ever confirmed by the admins. Likely a happy accident for them

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 1 month ago

There was a Reddit thread where they announced the server and explicitly said that was why. Can’t find it right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
86 points (91.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35212 readers
1498 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS