668
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
  • The Treasury Department and the IRS announced the collection of more than $1 billion in tax debt from high-income individuals over the past year.
  • In September, the IRS announced plans to expand its scrutiny of those making more than $1 million annually with more than $250,000 in recognized tax debt. 
  • However, the funding enacted in 2022 that is allowing the IRS to pursue its plans still has its critics, particularly among congressional Republicans.
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 142 points 4 months ago

However, the funding enacted in 2022 that is allowing the IRS to pursue its plans still has its critics, particularly among congressional Republicans.

"How dare they raise revenue from the tax cheats who vote for us!"

[-] Paraponera_clavata@lemmy.world 74 points 4 months ago

"tax cheats who bribe us!" FTFY

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

Tax cheats who bought the votes that put us in power, and to whom we are completely in service.

[-] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 months ago

"~~tax cheats who bribe~~ us!" FTFY

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Why are we going after the job~~s~~ creators 🤪

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 98 points 4 months ago

This explains Republican pledges to abolish IRS

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 69 points 4 months ago

This is the one that always gets me about "small government" people. They talk about inefficiencies and say, "the private sector can do it better," which is debatable because comparing money and service is subjective (IMHO, they're still wrong, but that's besides the point). Yet most of them don't want to properly fund tax administrators, when time and time again, they've shown they're a money multiplier. If you want a more basic, striped down tax code, I once again disagree, but fine, that's your opinion. However, in our current tax system enforcement is underfunded, and I think it just shows their true intent to enrich the wealthy.

[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

I mean the small government types are not the ones who typically pay attention to what actually is shown to work or not work.

Their view is big govt needs big taxes for big spending and big IRS steals people's hard earned money. No counterpoint or evidence will ever persuade them otherwise because it's a core belief that is largely beyond questioning.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

All enforcement is underfunded except the armed law enforcement against citizens. The enforcement of laws and corporations should be beefed up. And the start from big to small. Now enforcement just focusses on small companies as they don't have big legal teams and can be bullied into submission.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They talk about inefficiencies and say, “the private sector can do it better,”

The private sector generates profits, which can then be translated into passive incomes for lenders and dividend recipients. The public sector isn't explicitly designed to provide steadily increasing passive incomes to American plutocrats. That's the big difference.

However, in our current tax system enforcement is underfunded

Laws are for little people. The purpose of the IRS should be to make low-income tax credits and other poverty relief measures a political promise the smallest possible material benefit. It shouldn't be to claw back profits from the plutocrat class. Government should exist to guarantee the collection of rents from the working class and defend the property of the landlord class by extracting additional rents from the working class.

[-] rekorse@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I'm confused, you think the IRS should be protecting the wealthy from the working class?

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You can make a more basic stripped down tax code that’s still fair. What I’d like to see is instead of a stepped progressive tax rate, tax each dollar based on a function that approaches 100% somewhere around a million dollars. So maybe you can get another dollar by taking the next million, then one more by taking ten million, then the next one by taking a hundred million.

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 30 points 4 months ago

Beef up the IRS!

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 26 points 4 months ago

I'm a Fiscally Responsible Republican and this is HORRIBLE! We would be MUCH better off if instead of having Millionaires and Billionaires paying Taxes we instead had HOMELESS MOTHERS WHO HAVE NO MONEY paying Taxes!

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

As god intended!

[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Political control is largely a byproduct of media control/propaganda. No amount of reason will protect against never ending repetition of lies. (ie: Fox news profit model)

Im a Fiscally Responsible Republican and this is HORRIBLE! We would be MUCH better off if instead of having Job producers paying Taxes we instead had welfare queens and freeloaders paying Taxes!

It's not true, but if I repeat the narrative 100x and the truth only once, the narrative wins.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com -3 points 4 months ago

Curious to know as republican canidates were acceptable up to about the eighties or so for me. What republican officials makes you proud and you point to as a good government official?

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

I know some people will disagree, but the /s wasn't necessary here.

They were being sarcastic.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 4 months ago

you know. I read the last line wrong.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

As a fiscally responsible republican, I disagree

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I hear everyone is saying that it's exploding on the Internet.

[-] thenextguy@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

You know what they say...

A billion here, a billion there, eventually you're talking about real money.

[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Only need another to do it 13 more times and they can cover their own costs for the year. 812 more times and they can cover the defense budget for the year.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

They’re totally fine not collecting from billionaires

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 4 months ago

I imagine the IRS is going after millionaires for the same reason it goes after poor and lower middle class people: they lack the resources to mount a defense.

Billionaires have enough money that they could stall indefinitely. Or at least until they can fund a president that will just pardon them.

The only cure for billionaires is the guillotine.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

The only cure for billionaires (that helps everyone else) is to raise their flat tax rate to 70% ... like it used to be.

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

In 1944, the highest tax rate was 94%! By 1953, it had dropped. To 92%. We need to go back to that. The richest will find ways around it, but that’s not a reason not to do it.

[-] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

This headline uses "millionaires" to mean "people with over a million dollars in annual income" rather than "people with over a million dollars in net worth"

That's not your run of the mill "successful career with a healthy 401k" millionaire, that's at least ten-millionaires, mostly hundred-millionaires, and possibly some billionaires by net worth.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The term is Decamillionaires

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

… only $1b? That’s it? That number seems really low for millionaires.

[-] OopsAllTwix@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 months ago

Don't want to pay taxes, but are fine with having a king. It's almost like they're full of shit.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

However, the funding enacted in 2022 that is allowing the IRS to pursue its plans still has its critics, particularly among congressional Republicans.

I.e. Convicted and yet to be convicted tax criminals

[-] Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Fuckin" git it!

[-] xradeon@lemmy.one 9 points 4 months ago

Let me guess, Congressional Republicans are going to hate this....

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
668 points (99.4% liked)

News

23301 readers
1397 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS