this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
219 points (97.8% liked)

politics

24576 readers
2866 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A post that Mr. Trump circulated on Sunday called for Liz Cheney to be prosecuted by a military court reserved for enemy combatants and war criminals.

Included in the list of people to be brought up for war crimes against the United States were Current President Joe Biden, Current VP Kamala Harris, former VP Mike Pence, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Illinois Congressman Adam Kinzinger and Representatives Adam Schiff, Jamie Raskin, Pete Aguilar, Zoe Lofgren and Bennie Thompson.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.run 66 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Punishment can include and is not limited to death.

I think there's a bit of a sobering moment that we have a Presidential candidate that is calling for specific names to be held to a firing squad.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (6 children)

He tried to get Pence killed four years ago. We've known for at least that long that this is who Trump is. Republicans don't care.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 year ago

They do care. This is exactly what they want, a maniacal dictator who will kill all the "others" to implement a religious ethnostate

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hey, they may be handing the country over to Fascism, but at least the people they hate will suffer!

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yes, my life may suck, but at least I’m not a woke gay pride critical gender theory non-white lefty lib that believes in human rights.

/sarcasm

It’s depressing because honestly I am just sad for the people that get into the conspiracies

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Donald: we need a Night of the Long Knives.

SCOTUS: let us open the kitchen drawer for you.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

bit of a sobering moment

That’s why I’m investing and drinking lots of alcohol. Who wants to be sober as society collapses?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The trump/Hitler comparison is becoming less ridiculous

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] justdoitlater@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The guy that avoided drafting, is Putin's bitch and said vetetans who died in the war were loosers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can we please just label the republican party a domestic terrorist organization already?

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Can someone fucking kill this dude please.

[–] smnwcj@fedia.io 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden could, according to SCOTUS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

If Trump has his way, Ai will point to his post as a reason to do just that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Biden and co will literally get hunted down by Trump's goons if he doesn't use his new powers to do what needs to be done

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would be a reaaaal shame if someone interpreted this as a threat to the rule of law that necessitated some kind of presidential act. There's gotta be plenty of realistic ways to fuck with him in an official capacity.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not doing it would be literally suicidal on Biden's part.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can’t wait to see Biden take the “high road” and just sit back and let this play out and get himself executed. 🤦‍♀️

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How bout we jail this insurrectionist for high crimes against the United States

[–] Volkditty@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No can do, high crimes aren't against the law.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden can do whatever he wants now right?

[–] experbia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

no, the president (whoever it currently is) can do whatever he wants without any explanation needed as long as the Supreme Court (the majority selected by and loyal to trump) deems it an "official presidential action". unfortunately, all actions Biden can take would obviously fall into the "unofficial" classification because, you know, reasons of some kind and definitely no corruption.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even Hitler waited a little bit before making it clear he was going to purge

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The more I think about trump saying that he could shoot someone in broad daylight in front of millions, and not lose a single supporter….. the more I think he was right.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wonderful.

The delusional Q Anon 'secret military tribunals any day now' belief now stands a reasonable chance of actually happening.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Surely, surely, a significant portion of conservative voters can see that this isn't what democracy should look like, even if they're ardent republican supporters.

[–] fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

republican allegiance is to the bible, not the constitution. they say a lot of things about the constitution, but in the end, they just want christo-fascism. some of them are true believers in the make believe, others just use to justify their own cruelty.

either way, their motives don't matter. it's all about what we're going to do about it.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whether or not it's "what democracy should look like" is an opinion often based on whether you're on (or think you're on) the giving or receiving end of the oppression.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deello@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

This country went from undecided on the death penalty to openly embracing presidential hit squads seemingly over night. The right is saying who is on their list while the left is saying they should make one. Good times ahead.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell,

Lol, the angry orange wants to punish the turtle man who covered for him. You pick the best allies there turtle boy!

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would be schadenfreude to see Donald execute McConnell, but I wouldn't be able to really enjoy it.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

He's on his way out, anyway, so the time it would have been a benefit is gone.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hah, I expect that Mitch McConnell is still going to vote for him.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Of course. So will Pence.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Damn, Liz Cheney really lives rent free in that asshat's head.

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago

Military tribunals? Sounds like some of his article 2 powers with absolute immunity now, their use cannot be questioned. Go to town Trump, say the conservatives on the supreme court.

[–] MermaidsGarden@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well I for one look forward to fleeing our upcoming dictatorship

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why? If the imperial core isn’t safe, no where is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really wish my wife had agreed to move to New Zealand back in 2016.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow does he realize that by doing this he's basically making it self defence for Biden to anticipate him?

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe if he woke up enough to realize what's going on around him?

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Liz Cheney is not an enemy combatant. If this is Trump's definition of one, that as an authoritarian any dissent to his will is considered treason, then he'll still need to change the rules of military tribunals to allow prosecution of non-combatant civilians. In case anyone hasn't read it, Wikipedia has a page on Military tribunals in the United States - Wikipedia

It's curious Trump seems to believe that mere political dissent equates to enemy combat and physical violence. Imagine what he must think about Jan 6 that he has been keeping to himself. Can anyone say "project"?

He's saying he must be given a military tribunal as an enemy combatant?

What, no Hillary Clinton? Is he trying to lose again?

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

We live in the worst time line.

[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›