261
submitted 3 days ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 74 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And yet…. There are people here that are urging you to not vote against this clown.

Try and imagine that.

Then try and imagine why.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 23 points 3 days ago

I think I've mostly blocked all of the really transparent ones. Lol. Can't recommend that enough.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

I want to but I have fun being an ernest but utterly obstinate fuck towards them. Its funny watching someone arguing in bad faith just giving up in the face of an autist whos response to bad faith is to just keep going. I want to debate Kent Hovind and see how long it takes for him to rage quit because I hyperfocus on one point and mercilessly insult him in the most backhanded way possible.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Oh, if that's your jam, enjoy! I just don't have the time/energy to do that myself, lol, and I can only roll my eyes so many times in a day. I also do enjoy the sparring and watching them squirm to defend their bad faith positions.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago
[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

You're the hero we need but don't deserve.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

My morals may be absolute but my ethics are green and blue. Which is to say id make a terrible hero, id commit crimes against humanity while simultaneously enforcing my demented ass concept of liberty.

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I always tell people I'd be Darth Vader if given power. I'd fix the problems as I see them, but not in a way most people could get behind.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Vader was blinded by his own self loathing, grief, and hatred. He was little more than Palpatines attack dog and a slave to the Dark side. To be Vader is to be turbo depressed.

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

So perfect fit then.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago

The "silver lining" is that leadership showed their cards during J6, so intelligence agencies know who to watch. This would be the justification for giving up rights in the patriot act to fight terrorists.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

In theory, it works that way.

In practice, we've never openly stopped anyone with those systems.

When it comes time for them to justify the invasion of privacy, they don't have any school shooters stopped, and they don't have any Unabombers stopped. They don't have any cases of stolen kids stopped. They'd be shouting all that from the rooftops to expand and extend that funding.

If they have actually stopped anyone, it's at super-secret spy game levels. The guys you're expecting them to stop aren't even a concern for them. Worse yet, they may actually be rooting for them.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I'm not saying the lose of privacy is good.

[-] proudblond@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

Or they have stopped them, so we haven’t heard about it.

I’m not advocating giving up privacy but you don’t know for sure that these tactics don’t “work.”

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

You think they'd shut up if they could look like the heroes??? Lol You don't know cops.

[-] proudblond@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I guess I don’t think of the higher agencies as cops, even though they are. And those higher agencies (FBI, NSA, CIA, etc.) don’t strike me as the type of groups who want to keep the public informed—quite the contrary, actually. I would expect local cops to praise themselves if they got something right, sure.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

I’m curious.

You ever hear of the Beer hall putsch?

You know, Hitler’s version of Jan 6.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

We are in the period before Hitler went to prison and wrote Mein Kampf.

[-] Lupus@feddit.org 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Hitler was a young man at that time, don't forget that. ~~Time~~ History doesn't repeat itself but it rhymes.

I don’t think we’re gonna get the prison part in this timeline, but we do already have a book, though the book is just a trump-branded bible that includes a copy of the constitution or something like that.

It’s just mind-bending how successful wish.com Hitler has been with the most incredibly infantile and idiotic tactics, and additionally, on how many people those tactics work so well.

[-] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago
[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Trying to evoke nostalgia in millennials who have seen goatse.

[-] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

It works for Boebert. I guess they wanted to try it for Trump. Lol

[-] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

Anyone else see a vagina when they look at trumps neck flaps

[-] str82L@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

Missed that, but did think his mouth looks like a gaped anus.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

And that’s enough internet for today,

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

He doesn’t have a mouth. It’s just a second asshole.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I write again having done my own research. It turns out he's had a wifesaving neck surgery known as a twateotomy

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago

Please don’t insult vaginas. They did nothing to deserve that.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

You think maybe it's like his bioluminescent anglerfish lure, but for deranged sickos?

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
261 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18059 readers
2555 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS