this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
497 points (95.4% liked)

Science Memes

11081 readers
2537 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz
497
Electrons (mander.xyz)
submitted 5 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Up and down in what direction, electron?!?

Up and down on what direction?!?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Relative to A'Tuin

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 2 points 5 months ago

My favourite quark is the hubwise quark, closely followed by the widdershins quark

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Actually a good point, tho. And also a good thought: If there is no special direction, what would be up? And that's where quantum mechanics gets even weirder: It's either up or down in the direction you measure.

[–] i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's either up or down whatever the direction.

If you measure 100%up-0%down then you rotate your frame of reference by 90°, you automatically get 50%up-50%down... (iirc)

It's weirdly teasing us like that!

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Just in case it wasn't clear you can't measure anything other than "100%" up or down spin. The quantum state of it being 50/50 is described by 1/sqrt{2} times the up and down vector, when you measure it you have a probability of getting either result calculated by the square of the absolute (||psi||^2) that way you avoid getting a complex probability.

btw I was too scared to try in case it doesn't but can I use LaTeX in Lemmy comments? $\psi$ Edit: No LaTeX doesn't seem to work and btw I didn't study this so it might be taught differently at uni. This was explained to me in/for the context of quantum computing.

[–] i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

True! Thanks for the clarification, it's been a while since i played with the maths of quantum physics!

After you measure a spin as 100% up, the state will be close to that for a while, si the next measurement has higher chance of being up, with this probability slowly decreasing with time.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think that assuming the particle has no (extra?) energy it's state does stay the same. That is of course not possible in real life though but the <20 millikelvin in some quantum computers get pretty close.

Also I think nobody says they measure it as 0/100% up, They just say up or down in my limited experience.

Does anyone have any good resources on quantum mechanics? (Most of my information comes from a few professors) There's some useful stuff on chem libretexts (I think that's what it's called) for simple wave functions, but it doesn't seem perfect.

[–] i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

I have old college textbooks in my library, Cohen-Tannoudji. I'm not sure about online resources though...

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

At least in the Stern-Gerlach experiment it's relative to the magnetic field.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago

Yeah, quantum mechanics lingo: measurement = interaction

[–] jjagaimo@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

Yes and no