this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13539 readers
606 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
itsPina@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
121
If there is a candidate 1% worse than Hitler then you are morally obligated to vote for Hitler! (hexbear.net)
submitted 8 months ago by TankieTanuki@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We've all heard the liberal argument "if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you're morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler." But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huf@hexbear.net 3 points 8 months ago

hitler himself is only 99% hitler on his bad days, so i think we should vote for him and hope he has many bad days.