this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
558 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

17030 readers
2667 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Did... She just set the speed of light to 1?

[–] zerakith@lemmy.ml 57 points 2 years ago

This isn't uncommon in lots of physics calculations where you are working at the same scales a lot and its cumbersome to keep carrying the constants around and it adds risk of making a mistake.

Think of it as assuming you are working in a system of units where you measure all your speeds relative to the speed of light. So rather than saying the speed limit of a road is 30mph you would say its .000000045c.

[–] anzich@feddit.de 23 points 2 years ago

She's measuring distances in light-seconds. Then the speed of light is 1 light-second per second

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

1 what? Cucumber per nanosecond?

[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

1 speed of light of course.

[–] anzich@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago

Light-second per second

[–] Tranus@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Actually, yes. Light travels about 30cm in a nanosecond, around the size of a cucumber.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

Which is why I updated my comment from "banana per nanosecond", which itself was originally updated from "apple per picosecond" that I just put there randomly, without any thought.

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Is there another way to measure the speed of light?

[–] bier@feddit.nl 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's just a number, and all units are relative. So if you set it to 1 and make sure the equation still is valid it doesn't matter.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] stringere@leminal.space 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Except at the speed of light?

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It’s ludicrous!

[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just use the only practical unit of length, "lengthunit", which is equal to 299792458 meters (whatever those are...) times the only practical unit of time, "time unit", divided by a "second" (whatever that is...).

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

A "second" is the 2nd division of an hour.