user224

As usual, the answer is alcohol.
This DVD burned fine, but didn't read. I pressed my nail into the side to separate the 2 disc sections, then played around with it*, and finally stripped both the purple dye and reflective layer with isopropyl alcohol.

*I of course tried what it would do if re-inserted into the DVD drive. Single half wouldn't spin up. The spindle didn't have good enough grip. Placing the half with reflective layer back on top surprisingly made it read as a blank DVD, showing its (past) properties.
Trying to burn it again, unsurprisingly, resulted in I/O error.

Nothing bad happens in the post.

So, I have ordered something to Amazon locker for the first time.
It was already dark outside, but still just 19:20, so I went to pick up my parcel.
I got to the locker at around 20:30 (you see, the nearest locker isn't that close), while suddenly, I hear a car stop behind me, and I hear some German.
"POLIZEI", the car states.
Now, I don't speak German, but thankfully they spoke English.

"Where are you going?"
"To the Amazon box."
"Are you from [city]?"
"Yes."
"...OK..."
He sounded a bit confused/surprised, but it's just a 4km walk from the last bus stop at the other side of the border.

Well, I didn't wait after the OK, and just resumed walking towards the locker. They however stayed there, watching me.

"Well, this thing better be working.", I thought.
I typed in the code, doors opened, and the Police drove away.

I searched around if for some god knows what reason Austria has a curfew, nope.
Finally at last, while waiting for a bus back, I tried checking the locker on Amazon. For some reason, this is not stated on the order page. So, I go to my addresses, click to add a pick-up point, search for this locker, and would you look at that.
Open till 7pm.

But, like, why? It's just next to a parking lot, a few meters from the sidewalk. No locks, gate, anything.

At the end of 2023, the source code of GTA V has leaked. There were also some guides to build it from source.

Does anyone know if it was used in some way?

Just remembered it today when cleaning my phone's nearly full SD card, and GTAVSP.7z said hello.

I like the idea of X forwarding, but it doesn't work in real world anymore. As far as I know, it has to do many round-trips for everything. Launching something like LibreOffice Writer is funny, it will be loading bit by bit, icon by icon for several minutes. It was only usable for me on < 1ms network.

Unlike say VNC, it opens windows locally.

And now there's Waypipe which does the same thing, but for Wayland. And it actually works! Even better than VNC.

BUT, it doesn't work for X programs. It can somewhat work with rootful Xwayland... but that's basically a desktop for X-only programs.

Welp, I just wanted to check something on the remote desktop, so I launched VNC, and WOAH, I didn't expect to get XFCE invasion.
I didn't know XFCE can do Wayland now.

Anyway, this cursed thing does actually work pretty fine. xfce4-session works with Waypipe, good to know.

I accidentally untarred archive intended to be extracted in root directory, which among others included some files for /etc directory.
I went on to rm -rv ~/etc, but I quickly typed rm -rv /etc instead, and hit enter, while using a root account.

Edit 3: Tested with wg-quick on Arch, same issue re-occurs. So, let's say we have a peer on 192.168.1.1/24 with internal (wireguard) IP of 10.0.0.1/24, but we also want to route through it to rest of 192.168.1.0/24.
Instead of nice AllowedIPs = 10.0.0.0/24,192.168.1.0/24, it would have to be:
AllowedIPs = 10.0.0.0/24, 192.168.1.1/32, 192.168.1.2/31, 192.168.1.4/30, 192.168.1.8/29, 192.168.1.16/28, 192.168.1.32/27, 192.168.1.64/26, 192.168.1.128/25
Or there's something else going wrong. I only tried on Arch. Welp, as I said, it's not a thing that occurs with WG Tunnel on Android.

Edit 2: Hypothesis confirmed. Excluding the endpoint from AllowedIPs in NetworkManager solves the issue. However, this isn't a problem with 0.0.0.0/0, nor with WG Tunnel app on Android. I'll have to check with wg-quick. That seems most official.
Summary: NetworkManager tries to route traffic to WG peer over the same WG interface, and its /32 has to be excluded.

Edit: I noticed one thing, I'll try excluding the peer endpoint from AllowedIPs. It seems weird if it tries to connect to it over the interface between the 2 peers, which is of course impossible, but maybe? However, it is not matched by 0.0.0.0/0. Welp, time to experiment.

So, for 2 years I thought that NetworkManager Wireguard implementation is simply broken.
When I used a list of address ranges, like I should be (and am) able to do with Wireguard, I couldn't get any traffic through, however 0.0.0.0/0,::/0 would work.

Today I discovered something... interesting. It actually works... with a smaller list of AllowedIPs. Although even a larger list still ends up being shown by ip r.
So I went to AllowedIPs calculator as usual, created a desired list, pasted it in, and started removing IP ranges until I could ping a remote peer.

Problem solved? Well, no. I hoped it would be the limitation in number of routes, but it (also) seems to depend on route size.

Examples:
This is too much:
0.0.0.0/5,8.0.0.0/7,11.0.0.0/8,12.0.0.0/6,16.0.0.0/4,32.0.0.0/3,64.0.0.0/2,128.0.0.0/3,160.0.0.0/5,168.0.0.0/6,172.0.0.0/12,172.32.0.0/11,172.64.0.0/10,172.128.0.0/9,10.147.0.0/24
Removing one of the routes, 172.128.0.0/9 makes it work.
0.0.0.0/5,8.0.0.0/7,11.0.0.0/8,12.0.0.0/6,16.0.0.0/4,32.0.0.0/3,64.0.0.0/2,128.0.0.0/3,160.0.0.0/5,168.0.0.0/6,172.0.0.0/12,172.32.0.0/11,172.64.0.0/10,10.147.0.0/24

Time for mystery start. Keeping the same number of routes, but decreasing the size of one of them (second last) also makes it work:
0.0.0.0/5,8.0.0.0/7,11.0.0.0/8,12.0.0.0/6,16.0.0.0/4,32.0.0.0/3,64.0.0.0/2,128.0.0.0/3,160.0.0.0/5,168.0.0.0/6,172.0.0.0/12,172.32.0.0/11,172.64.0.0/10,172.128.0.0/10,10.147.0.0/24

Naturally, I tried breaking up 172.128.0.0/9 into 172.128.0.0/10 and 172.192.0.0/10, which breaks it again.

So, it seems to depend on both number and size of the routes. After all, larger ones alone worked.

Catbox appears broken, so Imgur again.

Just came up with my father again.
He blames me that mother forgot her phone's and Google password because I recommended against it being a word.
I mentioned encryption, "not necessary unless you're doing something illegal".
When mentioning lack of privacy with targeted advertisements, he said that he actually really likes them, because he bought a couple of things he wanted for years.

I don't really have good arguments.