this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
467 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40688 readers
3222 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/8955441

He was a coomer, Ben Franklin?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 29 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Ben Franklin owned seven slaves early in his life, but later got rid of them, became an outspoken critic of slavery, and worked toward its abolition.

Also, slavery or not, the point still stands. They wouldn't recognize America today and would be horrified.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

FYI, I recognise America and am also horrified, if that helps.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 14 points 17 hours ago

Tradition is just peer pressure from dead people.

If nothing would shock your ancestors, you have stagnated.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social -1 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Of what?

There was a transgender Royal Governor of New York State.

Edward Hyde, served 1702 to 1708.

You'd know that if you actually studied US history.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

You immediately assumed they held a position opposite of yours for no reason and then speak condescendingly to them, why? Maybe they think the founding fathers would be horrified by the same things you are horrified by. And even if they didn't, they aren't defending them, just stating the fact that they would indeed be horrified.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madison_Cawthorn

Funny thing. I happen to own an electronic device that allows me to search a thing called 'the world wide webbing.'

Using my advanced OKJeeves search engine, I learned something about Ms. Crawford.

One thing I learned about Ms. Crawford is that they don't think we should respect other people's preferred personal pronouns, so to honor that I'll refer to them as 'Ms.'

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

More condescending commentary.. ok?

Who is this person, and why do I care about them? And if they're so important, and you're so clever, why can't you keep their name consistent in your own comment?

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

why can’t you keep their name consistent in your own comment?

You seem confused. I referred to Ms. Crawford twice, and both times as 'Ms. Crawford.'

Also, your edit is as confusing a jumble as I've ever read. I have no idea what you're unhappy about.

Finally, I didn't 'assume' anything. I've run across Ms. Crawford's comments in the past, and happened to remember the name. I guess I overestimated you; I should have added an '/s' but I thought the using the terms 'worldwidewebbing' and 'OKJeeves' would convey my sarcastic intent.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Cawthorn

Crawford

My point is that your original comment was not to Cawthorn. It was to someone completely different. Cawthorn could have a swastika in his profile picture and call for the extinction of all trans people and it wouldn't justify your being rude to some random guy online who said, "yeah the founding fathers would be horrified".

You're acting like you're talking directly to the OP and responding directly to Cawthorn's tweet, when you're not.

Finally, I didn't 'assume' anything. I've run across Ms. Crawford's comments in the past, and happened to remember the name.

I'm not saying you're assuming Cawthorn's position. I'm saying you're assuming Dookieman12's position. What do Cawthorn's past comments have to do with the person you're actually responding to?

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

“Bonomi concluded that Lord Cornbury’s crossdressing was likely invented by his political enemies as character assassination.”

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And...?

My point was that the Founders would have been familiar with the idea of transgender. Also, most of them had studied the Classics, and would have known about Sappho and the initiation rituals of the Spartan warriors.

Homosexualism* wasn't invented in the 20th Century.

*I can't find the video, but I once heard William F. Buckley use that word and it's lived in my head ever since.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

… and your statement is totally false.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 5 points 12 hours ago

Sometimes it’s a “Sappho and her friend” situation, but it sounds like this guy was just a straight crook.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 10 hours ago

Of what?

There was a transgender Royal Governor of New York State.

This may come as a shock to you, but the existence of trans people is not the only significant change that has happened here since the 1700s.