this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
490 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40688 readers
3428 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/8955441

He was a coomer, Ben Franklin?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

You immediately assumed they held a position opposite of yours for no reason and then speak condescendingly to them, why? Maybe they think the founding fathers would be horrified by the same things you are horrified by. And even if they didn't, they aren't defending them, just stating the fact that they would indeed be horrified.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madison_Cawthorn

Funny thing. I happen to own an electronic device that allows me to search a thing called 'the world wide webbing.'

Using my advanced OKJeeves search engine, I learned something about Ms. Crawford.

One thing I learned about Ms. Crawford is that they don't think we should respect other people's preferred personal pronouns, so to honor that I'll refer to them as 'Ms.'

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

More condescending commentary.. ok?

Who is this person, and why do I care about them? And if they're so important, and you're so clever, why can't you keep their name consistent in your own comment?

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

why can’t you keep their name consistent in your own comment?

You seem confused. I referred to Ms. Crawford twice, and both times as 'Ms. Crawford.'

Also, your edit is as confusing a jumble as I've ever read. I have no idea what you're unhappy about.

Finally, I didn't 'assume' anything. I've run across Ms. Crawford's comments in the past, and happened to remember the name. I guess I overestimated you; I should have added an '/s' but I thought the using the terms 'worldwidewebbing' and 'OKJeeves' would convey my sarcastic intent.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Cawthorn

Crawford

My point is that your original comment was not to Cawthorn. It was to someone completely different. Cawthorn could have a swastika in his profile picture and call for the extinction of all trans people and it wouldn't justify your being rude to some random guy online who said, "yeah the founding fathers would be horrified".

You're acting like you're talking directly to the OP and responding directly to Cawthorn's tweet, when you're not.

Finally, I didn't 'assume' anything. I've run across Ms. Crawford's comments in the past, and happened to remember the name.

I'm not saying you're assuming Cawthorn's position. I'm saying you're assuming Dookieman12's position. What do Cawthorn's past comments have to do with the person you're actually responding to?

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 3 minutes ago

You're adorable.

Don't ever change.