this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
188 points (96.5% liked)

Science Memes

20383 readers
2309 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 14 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Genuinely though, English seems to lack the distinction between truth (the absolute state of something being universally true), truth (something that is correct from some point of view) and truth (an idea someone is dedicated to).

Some other languages have different words for these "truths". You could say that first is truth, second is perspective, and third is an idea, but all three can be named "truth", which can easily spark a debate over simple misunderstanding of what you mean, exactly.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 1 points 22 minutes ago

Factt opinion and belief. The word truth is a statement over belief of something.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I would argue that the first and third are perversions of the word. A truth that is universal should be called a law. Like the law of entropy. Unfortunately the word "law" has also ben twisted to mean legal policy. The third should be "belief," as it is what you hold inside you. Religion call their beliefs "truth" to push their agenda.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 3 points 10 hours ago

The obsession to have dedicated words when one would rarely bother to specify and just use the generic term anyway will forever elude me.

There is very little difference to me between saying two 1 syllable words and one two syllable words. And English is a very packed language. Most english wordy things already have meaning and reserving a 1 syllable thing that is sufficiently different to be distinguishable is just not realistic.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

English is a dogshit creole that also lacks distinction between libre and gratis and "cultural artist" and "visual artist" (Turkish : sanatkar v ressam)

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 5 points 5 hours ago

English is not a creole language.

To keep it simple, a creole language originates from children learning a pidgin (a contact "language" with barely any grammar), and "gluing" the lexicon with features on the spot. To the point its grammar doesn't resemble any of the parent languages over the course of, like, a single generation.

In the meantime English is simply a West Germanic language that got a bunch of borrowings from Old Norse and then Norman+French. Those borrowings don't change affiliation.

Regarding the distinction between "libre" and "gratis": it's simply that "free" displaced "costless". That sort of semantic shift happens, it's most of the time internal (i.e. not caused by interference of other languages).