this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
541 points (98.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40474 readers
3907 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 76 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It feels so out of the blue, so unnecessary. Like the writer had been bored. It's difficult to imagine that this didn't jolt readers out of the story, even at the time.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Languages change. Moron, idiot and imbecile used to be medical terms. Gay used to simply mean happy and excited. A fag used to be a term for a cigarette.

I really doubt it would have appeared in a mainstream children's book if it were seen as at all offensive.

Words like "bugger" and "damn" used to be extremely offensive curses. Now they're often used as very mild expressions of annoyance to avoid using the serious ones.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 31 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Fag still is a term for a cigarette...

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

Yeah, but only in old-timey countries, like England.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Weren't idiot, moron and imbecile medical terms specifically used by white scientists to describe black people back in the good old eugenics days of the 1920's America? Language changes sure but it often has very racist roots.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've never heard anything about it having a racial component.

[–] DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moron_%28psychology%29?wprov=sfla1

Moron is a term once used in psychology and psychiatry to denote mild intellectual disability.[1] The term was closely tied with the American eugenics movement.[2] Once the term became popularized, it fell out of use by the psychological community, as it was used more commonly as an insult than as a psychological term. It is similar to imbecile and idiot.[3]

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Eugenics was related to racism, but it wasn't the same thing as racism.

The intellectual ability / disability axis of eugenics was completely different from its skin colour axis.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

Once the term became popularized, it fell out of use by the psychological community, as it was used more commonly as an insult than as a psychological term.

Any term for something that is likely to be a target of scorn or mockery has this problem unless it's so bloodless, detached and clinical that it is effectively only usable as medical jargon and barely has any meaning outside that context. George Carlin once did a bit on this.

Related is how therapy language seems to increasingly be seeping into literally everything.

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Exactly. I started reading The Fellowship of the Ring again, and it takes some getting used to that "queer" is used in a completely different way than nowadays.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Queer is a strange one for me, growing up it was a straight up offensive slur for gay people but now the LGBTQ community has embraced it hard enough to give it its own letter.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As a Gen Xer, same. I still don't like using the word due to the negative connotation it used to have.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m 40; “queer” was definitely off-limits and felt very wrong when I was young and absolutely, unquestionably straight. I don’t know when it changed for me, maybe the 2010s?… but now it has zero negative vibes in my mind.

Perhaps my acceptance around that time that I am, and have always been, quite queer was responsible for that change in my life.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I don't identify with the term, which definitely makes a difference! It was (very successfully) reclaimed from the bigots to empower LGBTQ people.

Side note, it was nice to see Homer get over his homophobia!

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Ahhhh one of my favorite episodes!

It’s funny—when I was “straight”, I would never have used the word “queer”, even to describe things using its non-sexuality-meaning way. It just kinda… tasted vile to say, or hear, if that makes sense?

Nowadays, no matter who says it; be they straight, queer, or.. a third thing, it doesn’t taste bad anymore to me. I haven’t heard it used in a derogatory manner since I was much younger (probably due to the reclamation like you said!) but when I imagine someone trying to use it to put someone down, it just seems silly now… like “mhm, sure am, lawl”

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Addendum: when “Homer’s Phobia” was first aired (I think it’s called?) I was quite young and still felt that being gay is bad and wrong (badong), as I was indoctrinated to believe. I still loved the episode and Homer’s emotional maturation (is that a word?) made me feel good to see, yet it didn’t really affect how I viewed being gay at the time.

Indoctrination is a powerful thing!

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

maturation (is that a word?)

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Dad, why did you bring me to a gay steel mill?" was a top 10 Simpsons moment

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

We work hard, we play hard!

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, same. It still feels as weird and wrong as the f word or the n word.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought Q was for questioning.

Maybe i'm too old, but when I was a kid it just meant different, like the family down the street is rather queer, or we played a game where someobody in the classroom would change one thing, like take off their sweater and when you opened your eyes you had to identify which kid was queer

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've always heard it as "queer", and the definition of queer has morphed since then from simply "gay" to "someone whose gender is not easy to define", or sometimes as an umbrella term for anyone covered by the other letters. The whole thing is rather confusing. I'm content to just treat them like any other people.

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

But my best gay friend prefers "GSM" for gay and sexual minorities. I don't like GSM because that is already the Global Standard Man, but I'm a cis-gendered straight white Christian male, so my opinion don't matter.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

I must be old, since the original meaning is still what comes to mind first when I hear it in a non-LGBTQ context.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 2 points 1 month ago

This is from South Africa in the year 2000. It just means unusual in this context.

https://www.songlyrics.com/saron-gas/beer-lyrics/

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Buggery used to be a crime, now it's a gay way to spend an afternoon

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wonder if straight people were ever convicted of buggery with he opposite sex? I wouldn’t be surprised if “buggery” existed solely to persecute homosexuals back then.

(I was gonna say “non-straight” or “queer” but “homosexuals” read in 30’s English accent sounded funnier to me in my head)

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sodomy used to be a common add on charge in sexual assault cases. I don't know if it was ever used outside that context other than to harass gay people. I assume buggery was used the same way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Enid Blyton used it a surprising amount. But she was also considered old-fashioned and racist by critics at the time, so…

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

"Bah humbug," was that era's equivalent of Scrooge wandering around saying, "whatever, bullshit."

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean... there's also a famous Agatha Christie's book that used to have the N-word in its title.

We're viewing these things with our modern eyes. But they didn't have this kind of sensibility those days. It probably felt like using any other word: normal.

I wonder if our grandchildren will feel the same way about something we say normally today.

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

there’s also a famous Agatha Christie’s book that used to have the N-word in its title.

until 1985!

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

I doubt whether the vast majority of British readers would’ve been jolted by it - at the time of first publication. It was a word that had been in everyday parlance that got attached to dark “things” as a describer.

Here’s the thing though, go forward maybe 15 years again and you have the 1964 Smethwick constituency election. The winner had a, uhh, memorable slogan: “If you want a n***** for a neighbour, vote Labour.”

It’s worth noting that the “n*****s” in question were, most likely, gonna be from the Punjab. Go figure.

So, yeah, in less than a generation the word in question went from everyday speech with no overt pejorative meaning to the explicitly racist word it is today. It morphed.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wonder if Carlin ever tried sneaking that past the censors.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

George Carlin was voicing Mr Conductor in the American dubs in the 1990s, so a solid 20 years after the retraction

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago

I mean it is from 1951. I've seen a lot worse by people who meant it.

It's 4 years before Emmett Till was murdered for example.

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was England, which never treated the n-world quite like those ungrateful colonials.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It was called out for being offensive even in that time by fellow English.