this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
326 points (89.8% liked)

Fediverse memes

2420 readers
448 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
  1. Be respectful
  2. Post on topic
  3. No bigotry or hate speech
  4. Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
Specific
  1. We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

To be fair, tanks seem to be a favored tool of these oppressive regimes. I'm personally not against communism, they have some good ideas like universal child care, guaranteed jobs, and housing (even though the latter may be considered sub-par by some). The problem comes when these fucking authoritarian cheerleaders come out and say communist governments were never oppressive.

[–] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

The "oppression" you're referring to is confiscating the properties of bourgeois capitalists and landlords, and imprisoning them and their accomplices in case of resistance. This confiscation and appropriation by the state is what makes free, universal care and other social benefits possible. It's absurd to expect the features of communism without the policies behind them.

Also, the idea that authoritarian socialist governments just have a sadistic tendency to oppress and torture poor peasants is deeply unserious and a work of imagination created by western capitalist propaganda.

[–] belluck@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The oppression they’re referring to is shooting at protestors wanting democratic reforms. The comment before that literally gives an example, the least you could do is look into it.

[–] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

First of all, socialist governments, like any other government, did not use force on protestors unless provoked by seditious behavior (i.e. coup attempt or political unrest), and only in proportion, which was the case in Hungary and in China. Stories about tanks crushing the bodies of protestors is fictitious. Also, the history of the Soviet Union, the PRC and other socialist polities is filled with workers protests that were left unaltered because they are a natural part in the process of building socialism. Thus, the idea that freedom of expression was inexistent under socialism is false, which leads me to my second point.

The claim that the riots in socialist states called for "democratic" reforms is the furthest thing from the truth. In the case of Hungary, the 1956 uprising was orchestrated by the Prime Minister in order to establish a capitalist multi-party system and restore the property of the big landowners after they were purged in the preceding decade and their industries nationalized by the state. If you consider this to be "democracy" then you cannot consider yourself to be a leftist.

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 0 points 18 hours ago

Thousands were killed in the uprising.

The demands largely emphasized national sovereignty and labor conditions, not restoration of appropriated property to the bourgeoisie.

Justifying an invasion, an act of aggression over international borders, under the characterization of sedition is simply begging the question of the legitimacy of the established structure of governance.

By this point, Soviet governance was failing to produce improved conditions for workers, and much of the working class was disinterested in further personal sacrifice for a prolonged struggle against the capitalist core.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca -4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Citations in an uncensored medium needed.

"Confiscating the properties of , imprisoning them and their accomplices in case of resistance. This confiscation and appropriation by the state is what makes possible."

This seems like an instantiation of neocolonialism adlibs. Is your name Trump, Netanyahu, or Putin by any chance? The fact that you imply that these are in any way a requirement for universal care or social benefits gives your game away.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

This seems like an instantiation of neocolonialism adlibs.

Someone needs to tell Mohammed Mossadegh that he was doing neocolonialism when he nationalized the natural resources that had been stolen by British colonizers and that he's exactly like Netanyahu for it. I guess the CIA was right to overthrow him, democracy be damned.

What an absolutely insane take.

[–] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't the checkmate you think it is.

“Fascists brush their teeth twice a day. You also brush your teeth. That means you are a fascist!!!”

Do not omit the context from the general notion. I am speaking of bourgeois industrialists who exploit the working class, and not native populations with the right to sovereignty.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 0 points 12 hours ago

So no citations, just the same old regurgitated propaganda that has been in the library stands for decades. I think we've reached common ground, you recognize you are basically proposing:

“Confiscating the properties of , imprisoning them and their accomplices in case of resistance. This confiscation and appropriation by the state is what makes possible.”

And I'm just pointing it out. You speak of that only easily materializing in the caricatures you have in your mind but which you would do your best bourgeois impersonation to apply liberally if you ever got the power to do so. This isn't the checkmate you think it is, you are just wearing a different brand of rhetoric that just ends up devolving in a pretty similar way.

Uh huh right, source me reality then, enlighten us that live in The Cave

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ahh yes, the burgeois sailors of kronstadt.

[–] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

300 communists were arrested and imprisoned by the Provisional Revolutionary Committee but hundreds of others escaped. The prison warden, Shustov, claimed to be an anarchist and planned to execute 23 Bolshevik prisoners, although the execution was prevented by the arrival of the Red Army.

The mutiny was supported by members of the White Army and British foreign minister George Curzon encouraged the Finnish government to intervene against the Bolsheviks.

On 17 March, the mutiny was defeated and Petrichenko ordered the crews of Sevastopol and Petropavlovsk to destroy their ships and go to Finland. The soldiers did not follow orders and arrested many members of the Provisional Revolutionary Committee. In May, Petrichenko went to Finland and joined the White Army under General Pyotr Wrangel.

Source.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm personally not against communism, they have some good ideas like universal child care, guaranteed jobs, and housing (even though the latter may be considered sub-par by some).

Tankies never seem to get that that part is not being critized, but the subversive of the movement by authoritarians.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

This is projection on three levels

First you're projecting a lack of knowledge

Second you're projecting basic social democratic policies onto socalism

And finally you're projecting onto socalism the 'subversive authoritarians' that have done nothing but dismantle those policies while committing the worst atrocities in history around the world

And anyone who stands up to them (authority) gets called a tankie

The only good leftist is the one that votes for the BLUE genocidal drill-baby-drill rapist

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Except you'd not get that healthcare and the rest if you didn't pay people off.

In theory it might seem fine, but in reality it was just a dictatorship, and quite a brutal one too.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

Anything's possible when you make shit up

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Except you’d not get that healthcare and the rest if you didn’t pay people off.

eh docs and nurses are pretty fucking cool but don't work for free. of course you're going to pay people off, they need wages ffs

[–] Subdivide6857@midwest.social 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Communism = no currency. There doesn't seem to be a whole lot of knowledge regarding communism in here. A bit of an echo chamber. It's funny how so many can hate something so much without actually knowing what it is they're hating. Ha.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

...I'd prefer a single payer system where no one went without. Broke my nose while living in the UK and was impressed with their no bullshit system.

you can have democratic socialism of many flavors without going full on communism, and you'll never get to communism from here, abjectly shittified capitalism. I'd prefer denmark over...well, where has communism worked?

Like, I respect the medical professionals Cuba produces but would never want to live there.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Extremists like to use "alternative facts" or whatever other tactics achieve their goals. The means does not matter to them, only the ends, which they feel self-righteously justifies anything to achieve.

And then separately from that, gullible people also exist too. It is a bias that we all could fall prey to, though some of us seem more on guard against it than others.

(Tbf, many of those claiming those alternative facts are quite aware of just how nonfactual they actually are - they simply do not care as power, rather than correctness, is all that there is to them.)

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

(Tbf, many of those claiming those alternative facts are quite aware of just how nonfactual they actually are - they simply do not care as power, rather than correctness, is all that there is to them.)

This comment is dripping with unintentional irony. How many times have you been shown a picture of bicycles and pretended they were dead bodies?