this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
112 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14263 readers
674 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And hang out in Epstein’s plane, with Bill, because that motherfucker is always there?

Like, they are all implicated apparently. Anyone you can think of…Chomsky, Mick Jagger, Barney, Elmo, Big Bird. Maybe Marx was just wrong about dialectical materialism, should have been dialectical pedophilia wtf

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nothing I can say is outside CW, everything Epstein related as a general warning:

spoilerI think it’s less than the pathology of child attraction and more the pathology of constant transgression for the thrill of it.

We legally call the pedophiles’ actions as r*** because the power dynamic means children can’t legally consent. It’s a legal dynamic designed to shield children and it’s a good one. But I think we run the risk of misidentification in this circumstance.

Some of these men are undoubtedly pedophiles. Some of them might not, specifically, be attracted to children. What Epstein was was a removed. His pathology is that of a serial removed, and what was being “sold” by him was removed.

In a way the entire pedophilia thing is almost a distraction. I am sure the number of victims who were legally of a consenting age in a given place isn’t insignificant either.

What all of the victims have in common is a general youth or outright child-likeness. The power dynamic is part of this. This is basically whatremoved culture looks like because this is it when it’s rich enough to wear itself on its sleeve. This is the brazen version the rich get up to. This is it writ large.

And what this says about the rich is very telling. Very telling that this was something they were all part of. That it spread in their ranks because the psychology of the rich is the psychology of a taker. I could keep building this whole argument. All of it is implicitly woven together.

This is a glance into arch villainy. I don’t know what else to call it. Cruelty for the thrill. They want to be loved and feared.

These are at least the plates I am spinning in my head when I think about all this and what it says about everything.

Edited to be clearer with the content