this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
670 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

17325 readers
2265 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

-40C = -40F

Also 0lbs does not equal 0kg when there’s no gravity.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

huh?

Mass doesnt change with gravity

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Typically, lbs is not mass, it's weight/force.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

isn't that lbf?

The pund itself is defined as 0.45359237 Kg

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lbs can be lbf or lbm, but usually is referring to lbf, which is 0.4536 kg at 1g.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago

when comparing to kg I will assume the mass unit, since comparing a mass value to a force has no meaning.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And temperature doesn't change with pressure

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure if you're joking, but it does. PV=nRT

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no mass multiplied with gravity still results in no force, 0 Lb = 0 Kg; 0 Lbf = 0 N

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yes, but 1kg also results in no force, so it's a trivial statement.

[–] Linearity@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gravity? What does that have to do with mass

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Nothing in this context, but it can have a lot to do with force, for which pounds is the US customary unit.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago

when compared to a value in Kg, the only logical interpretation is the mass pound. If it were lbf, the si unit conversion would be Newtons.

Having the same name for two different, but easily mixed up units is really annoying haha

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's clear from context clues that they don't mean Force. As kilograms are an indicator of mass, not force. It's not our fault that US' imperial system is silly.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Imperial is a British thing, and the quantities differ significantly from US customary.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Nope. As I said, the US customarily uses US customary units. They ARE NOT identical to "Imperial" units, despite the coincidental naming.