this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
675 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

17325 readers
2318 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Linearity@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gravity? What does that have to do with mass

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Nothing in this context, but it can have a lot to do with force, for which pounds is the US customary unit.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago

when compared to a value in Kg, the only logical interpretation is the mass pound. If it were lbf, the si unit conversion would be Newtons.

Having the same name for two different, but easily mixed up units is really annoying haha

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's clear from context clues that they don't mean Force. As kilograms are an indicator of mass, not force. It's not our fault that US' imperial system is silly.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imperial is a British thing, and the quantities differ significantly from US customary.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nope. As I said, the US customarily uses US customary units. They ARE NOT identical to "Imperial" units, despite the coincidental naming.