this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
595 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

16757 readers
2466 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HyonoKo@lemmy.ml 35 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Maybe it’s some higher dimensional grad student simulating something to get some plots to add to a poster his postdoc wants him to present at a small time conference somewhere. Our consciousness is just a side effect because he insisted in doing the coding in Haskell.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 days ago

Your reply kinda reminds me of Thirteenth Floor.

[–] bobo@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Our consciousness is just a side effect because he insisted in doing the coding in Haskell.

Lisp is the true God's programming language...

[–] HyonoKo@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Wow awesome cover!

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Maybe it's some kid's half-assed science project.

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

That's so many nested assumptions, lol:

Assumption table

  1. Graduate student in academia
  2. Running a simulation for data
  3. For a conference
  4. Haskell

The probability value of all four being true simultaneously approaches ≈0%

Don't forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Come on, it doesn't work like this. You can disprove the funny theory only if you give us an even more ridiculous one in it's stead.

[–] muzzle@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Don't forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age.

Most of it is empty. The trick is lazy evaluation.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Our telescopes eats up CPU cycles fast, the poor blokes cloud server will come with an unsuspecting bill this month...

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

Yeah, it uses a simplified model unless you look too close. That's how you get those funny quantum effects. Although, I have to say, great sativa, dude

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Don't forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age.

I mean, if it's really a simulation, all of that would be... simulated.

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I know; I'm just fishing out counter-examples and counter-arguments.