Naz

joined 3 years ago
[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Bro, small world; I'd never expect anyone even remotely associated with this bread company to be on Lemmy, lol

Dave's Killer Bread is out of this world, it's genuinely incredible and I've been buying it whenever I see it in shops

On mayo lubricant: I picked that term/joke up from a YouTube Chef, I think Binging Babish who was on a quest to re-create a deli sandwich at home, and he said one of the key components is some kind of oil or lubricant 😁

38
Chicken Muenster (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Naz@sh.itjust.works to c/SandwichPosting@sh.itjust.works
 

Heat: Foreman Grill / Panini

Bread: Dave's Killer Bread

Lubricant: Kraft Mayo

Sauce: Mustard (left), Sweet Baby Ray's (right)

Greens: 50/50 Organic Spring Mix

Protein: Manager's Special Chicken Breast (lol)

Cheese: Muenster

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Crazy how the description of a painting by an art critic could now be used to recreate the painting

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Thank you based Internet autist for doing the legwork and sharing your obsession of lexicography and cryptography 🩵

I think your initial hypothesis is correct, that the author simply pasted an English ~~word~~ phrase into an English/ASCII to Hieroglyphic converter, with the second word being Angry, and shit out some hieroglyphics.

Ironic, considering the punchline of the joke

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Goddamned amazing.

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Scroll up and down

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Diablo 2: Act 5

;)

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

Lmao checked the comments hoping for exactly this sentiment

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

He has to go to super hell

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

In any cyclical or trending system (especially one influenced by multi-year cycles like El Niño and La Niña), you expect to see clumps. Years with similar atmospheric conditions will naturally cluster together.

An overall upward trajectory is defined by the movement of those clusters over time and the long-term statistical trend is anomalous because of shattering of previous ceilings.

The flaw in your logic is the implicit assumption that because historical data points share similar values, the new, record-breaking spikes are somehow less significant or anomalous.

We're living in unprecedented times, geologically. Fighting reality by questioning the measurements is a uphill battle, and disingenuous at best.

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Where's that famous flow chart?

Do you fear God? No

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
Answer: stop-poll-ut-ting

Hint: Satire

 
view more: next ›