this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
1449 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

19026 readers
86 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 537 points 10 months ago (6 children)

The reason not to use pencils in Space wasn't that Pencil are inflamable, the main reason was the graphit dust produced by Pencils, which because of the lack of gravity, enter floating in the electronic, causing short circuits as main risk.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Probably not great for eyes or noses or filtration systems either

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Twist: you’re the filtration system.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I guess we are in a way a filtration system that removes oxygen from the air...

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Ok there Ongo Baglogian

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also a broken bit of lead could easily float into someone's eye or get aspirated.

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There is no way either side used lead pencils. Saying lead is in pencils is a very outdated thing, it's all graphite these days.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A sharp piece of graphite from a broken pencil is not something you would want in your eyes either

[–] copd@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Genuine question. why did you choose to use "inflammable" instead of "flammable"?

[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Inflame was the original word for 'to ignite' - to set aflame, to set on fire. We still see if in metaphor, 'inflammatory argument' or 'inflamed passion', for example.

So an inflammable object was one you can inflame (or enflame). The word 'flammable' came about later, probably to reduce confusion for people who thought it mean 'un-flameable'.

These days we use flammable on labels for safety reasons, but inflame is still peppered throughout language in metaphor and medicine, and both are correct.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] FrankenSpinach@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] RadicalCandour@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago

Oh dear, the internet is leaking again.. Call the locksmith 🗣️

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

inflammation, inflamed, inflammable

inflammable = easily ignited

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

This is the most upvotes I think I have ever seen on a comment here.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

and thin paper shavings = space kindling. the entire argument is fucking dumb.

perhaps the sovs gnawed their pencils sharp and consumed all the graphite fragments and shavings lol. good lil soviet space beavers

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The Soviets were using grease pencils IIRC before also switching to the Fisher Space Pen around 1969. The grease pencil eliminated the risk of graphite floating around but the writing quality isn’t great.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If I remember correctly, the Soviet engines were a lot harder to short out, so pencils weren't as big a problem in their spacecraft.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

the Soviet engines were a lot harder to short out,

bwahaha this is idiotic. anyone familiar with the long litany of rocket failures out of baiknor knows their engines weren't 'harder to short out' whatever silly shit you mean with it.

short out what? the alternator? bwahahahahaahahahaha

short out the fuse box? dear god, I'm dying here