Lemdro.id

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43649884

CAH Gives You Your Fucking Money Back

Post content:

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS! That decision belongs to YOUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, and the tremendous leaders I appoint to run our Military.

The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE trying to STRONG-ARM the Department of War, and force them to obey their Terms of Service instead of our Constitution. Their selfishness is putting AMERICAN LIVES at risk, our Troops in danger, and our National Security in JEOPARDY.

Therefore, I am directing EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use of Anthropic’s technology. We don’t need it, we don’t want it, and will not do business with them again! There will be a Six Month phase out period for Agencies like the Department of War who are using Anthropic’s products, at various levels. Anthropic better get their act together, and be helpful during this phase out period, or I will use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow.

WE will decide the fate of our Country — NOT some out-of-control, Radical Left AI company run by people who have no idea what the real World is all about. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

Since a lot of miscellaneous online accounts are reacting glibly to the idea that states like California and Colorado could force Linux to bake forced age verification into the kernel, my instinctual response is to a) disregard the opinions of smug computer guys because they're usually libertarians and b) consider which vectors these laws will actually be enforced through. There is a clear sweeping effort to implement these policies, so I assume the effect will be somehow tangible.

Since I'm doing self-study for IT certs at the moment, I’ll list out all the ways I can think of off the top of my head, though some, if not most, will be overcomplicated/inefficient. Disclaimer that I am only doing some investigating here and relying on my prior experience/knowledge otherwise (reason: eepy) so do not take this as anything definitive/inherently correct. I'll try to skip over the ones that have the same vector of implementation/execution (I.E. where are they enforced through?)

• Client-side:
  • via hardware/manufacturers - controls on boot loaders via boot-restriction mandates, so that commercial laptops and desktops sold in the US are required to ship with UEFI firmware that refuses to boot un-American operating systems.
  • via OS distributors - operating systems/distributions made by companies operating in the US are required to integrate age verification protocols into their onboarding experience in order to continue operating/doing business in the US, or in order to avoid fines. Microsoft, Apple and Google would probably already be on board with this from the jump, so what's a few rankled Linux distro maintainers going to do? Not comply? Time to pack your shit and move, then! Now you can't access the consumption core as a market anymore. Sucks to suck!
  • via browsers - Browser controls. This is how it could transmit your information reliably to web servers. Google is based in the US, Mozilla is based in the US, Apple is based in the US. Chrome (plus all US-based Chromium forks), Firefox and Safari now ship with a process that verifies you have a digital ID registered on your device, prompts you to register one if you don't, and locks you out until you do.
• Server-side:
  • via websites/applications - All social media (or even all sites/apps) operating out of the US are legally required to validate against a digital ID protocol baked into your operating system, routed in via your Freedom-Compliant Browser as a mandatory fingerprint that you can't not expose. If the digital ID is determined to be not present, either through subversion or non-compliant software, you cannot access the site. This would probably be selectively enforced w/ regards to penalizing the sites themselves, because otherwise Silicon Valley throws a tantrum, but it would force your browser to expose your age at best and your identification hash (or however they would decide to implement the protocol such that you are a traceable entity) at worst.
• Social enforcement:
  • on an individual level - Even if it's not 'truly enforceable' if you find a hack that lets you bypass it because you know how your device works, it could be used as a charge-stacking/pinning vector for dissidents, call it Digital Identity Fraud.
  • on a corporate level - Most of them will pre-comply, but if they don't, just declare their products non-compliant with the law and treat them accordingly, killing their legitimate revenue and forcing all non-compliant systems underground so laymen decide it's not worth the trouble of navigating even if it's better for them, like piracy

Ultimately this is just me theorizing with my limited half-finished A+ cert study knowledge and general tech understanding, but I tried to engage the thought experiment on how this could be turned into something tangible as best I can.

I'd like to turn this over to people who might know more than me here. Is my idea of how this might be implemented (if done competently) consistent with the underlying tech, or am I misunderstanding some things? What other vectors might be used here? If these new bills pass, does anything change for us? What could our approach be individually/as a site/as a movement? What behavioral changes should we implement with regard to our internet usage as precaution? Would appreciate answers to any of these bits, even individually. Thus far the only approach that I can think of on 5 hours of sleep is the correct approach and has always been the correct approach and that is to but I'm curious if and how we can struggle against the furthering of the panopticon as targets of it.

In early 2025, when Bluepoint again pitched the idea of Bloodborne remake, the studio was told that the numbers made sense but FromSoftware didn’t want it to happen, according to people familiar with the process.

Former PlayStation executive Shuhei Yoshida shared a theory last year that this might be the case, saying in an interview with Kinda Funny Games that he thought FromSoftware president Hidetaka Miyazaki was interested in remaking the classic game but too busy to do it himself and “doesn’t want anyone else to touch it.” He added that he thought PlayStation would respect Miyazaki’s wishes despite owning the franchise.

Live in the past, is mine. I will listen to things over and over because some songs or even podcast episodes, rewind me back to times where I felt comfortable in. I do sometimes poke my head out to see where things are currently in the present, but nothing around really makes me gravitate to anything current-day. But, then I just go back to my hole in living in the past.

People used to tell old people to get over it about them remembering things as they were all of the time. I'm understanding why they do that. Sometimes the present really truly sucks.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43644269

She must be one of us

A November 2011 video has resurfaced of Donald Trump accusing then-President Barack Obama of wanting to start a war with Iran.

Trump stated in the video that Obama had "absolutely no ability to negotiate" and would initiate a war with Iran.

Poopoo peepee that white bitch is a clown

btw no ai.

The Pentagon and the Energy Department have airlifted a small nuclear reactor from California to Utah, demonstrating what they say is the potential for the U.S. to quickly deploy nuclear power for military and civilian use.