woodenghost

joined 1 year ago
[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

My communists can make mistakes sometimes, as a treat.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sure and when was the last time a company in Europe was nationalized for similar reasons? That's right, it never happens, except to targets of the empire. Mismanagement? Corruption? Tax fraud? They are ubiquitous. European politicians see it as their foremost duty to protect the guilty CEOs, stakeholders and companies.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't they only get the revolutionary new sanitation technology of "trash cans" this year?

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I got serious fascist vibes from it and stopped reading.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes, I think we need to make an important distinction here. The word "control" is used for two valid, but distinct things: Sometimes it's used to argue about moral responsibility. Sometimes it's about strategy in our struggle. Like if one side "controls" the other, are there nodes of control that can be exposed and targeted politically? I think in both cases, the word "control" simplifies the complex relationship, so I won't use it any more in this. But luckily it's not needed to answer either question.

About moral responsibility, I think it's really important to recognize, that powerful people in the US (politicians, generals, billionaires, etc.) are equally responsible for the genocide, just like the ones in Israel. Both can be morally responsible at the same time. The same goes for state institutions. Morally, the ones in the US do have the freedom to withdraw support and that would stop the genocide. It's not important for moral consideration, that they won't do that for material reasons. To face this moral truth is important for our propaganda and also a question of respect and solidarity for Palestinians.

The other question is about our strategy. Here, a materialist perspective is needed. From inside the imperial core, pushing for BDS is the obvious strategy, which targets Israel directly. But because of the "tangled web of connections", which you mentioned, there are also important sides of struggle in the US. And many center around trying to sever at least some of those connections: the ones between universities in the US and Israel for example. US firms with close ties to Israel are another. There are others and these sides of struggle can be understood as an extensions of BDS.

Politically targeting legislature, think tanks, members of congress with ties to Israel is another logical strategy. It's best to concentrate on few targets instead of spreading our efforts out. Like snipping one strang of a complicated knot at a time instead of trying to rip it all apart at once.

This strategy does not mean, that we believe a complete severance of the connections between the US and Israel is possible. It is not. Even, if Israel was magically destroyed tomorrow, the US would invent a new one. But similar to a labor struggle in which a single strike can't abolish capitalism, anti-imperialist actions can still gain wins, even if the whole of imperialism isn't abolished yet.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I found this on wikipedia:

Irène "was accidentally exposed to polonium when a sealed capsule of the element exploded on her laboratory bench in 1946". That was from her own work. She lived another ten years, then died from leukemia.

Ève lived to be 102 years old and died in her sleep in 2007.

Both actively supported peace and were anti fascists. Irène was a socialist, visited Moscow, befriended Soviet scientists and supported the Republic in the Spanish civil war.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

So the article doesn't mention how word got out about who donated, right?

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If I could upvote it more, I would <3

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes. The contradictions of capitalism are only getting worse. Workers, care givers, nature, social institutions, racialized people and countries, all can only be exploited and expropriated so much. But capitalism demands more and more. So it will continue getting worse until successful revolutions. But you don't have to feel detached about it. You can try to understand it, tell others about it, look around for awesome people struggling against it, maybe even find ways to help them. I started reading Nancy Fraser's new book "Cannibal Capitalism" it's short, tries to be accessible and it explains how all those areas of struggle I mentioned above are connected.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Everything is political.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

Palestinians actually have an exceptionally high rate of education. You're right, that the fascists what to destroy that.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. "Doverflowing with ideology"?

view more: ‹ prev next ›