this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8556 readers
48 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hate standpoint theory so much it's the biggest blight in talking to people to people on anything.

You can be educated on something but then they go 'erm but I come from this background "

I hate it so much it's so anti intellectual

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 45 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Come on, folks. It isn't difficult to look up things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standpoint_theory

Standpoint theory, also known as standpoint epistemology,[1] is a foundational framework in feminist social theory that examines how individuals' social identities (e.g., race, gender, disability status), influence their understanding of the world. Standpoint theory proposes that those in positions of marginalization are able to achieve certain standpoints which put them in a better position to know certain facts about the world related to that marginalization.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 22 points 2 months ago

I don't want to look up things. I want my comrades to teach me.

[–] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

in a better position to know certain facts about the world related to that marginalization.

It's a pretty marginal claim. You don't think that's true?

[–] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 55 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It IS true, but once liberals learned about it, it got bastardized into "we found a Black person who says Joe Biden is good and you're being racist for dismissing their lived truth."

Instead of deferring to oppressed peoples as an epistomogical authority on the conditions of their own oppression, they just dig up people from the same category and use the language of standpoint epistemology to position them as authorities on any arbitrary self-serving issue.

[–] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 21 points 2 months ago

Essentially the same as cherry-picking transphobic "experts" to build up the Cass Report while ignoring the mountain of research that clearly shows transition is overwhelmingly positive and safe for 99% of people. Or finding the few pick-me trans people that will sell out their brothers and sisters for right-wing grift money (Blair White, Brianna Wu, etc).

[–] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)

anakin-padme-3 But from MY point of view, the Jedi are evil!

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago

They literally are.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 33 points 2 months ago

But my "father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate" lived in China and he hated it.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hyper_red@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago

Google is free will always be a valid response to these kinda questions

[–] Angel@hexbear.net 17 points 2 months ago

Standpoint theory has truth to it, but it can be absurdly reductive. Lived experience is important, but it does not automatically make you an expert on systems of oppression. Liberals do not seem to understand this.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 17 points 2 months ago
[–] Chana@hexbear.net 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Another term for this is tokenization. The premise being that an individual of X background is surely the authority on all topics related to X so you must believe them. This is, by necessity, inconstantly applied, because actual humans disagree with each other and know vastly different amounts about topics and have differing interests and backgrounds despite all being X.

Liberals use it constantly to give their bad ideas weight, as they can't argue them on merit. Discussing a country and imperialism? Let's bring in the gusano that knows jack shit but is very condescending. Want to go in a different direction in a strategy discussion? Sorry, John is Vietnamese (his grandparents immigrated from Vietnam) and says China is bad. There's often a racist tone to it that they don't recognize.

[–] Hyper_red@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Chana@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah it's disruptive and annoying. You've actually gotta rid organizing spaces of it in its entirety because otherwise libs will take them over using these bad faith tactics.

[–] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago
[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is a form of essentialism, and essentialism is the philosophy that underlies reactionary politics.

"Look for answers by assigning an immutable category to everything."

[–] Hyper_red@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Liberals are reactionaries

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

Reactionaries are essentialists; liberals are relativists. Liberals are vulnerable to reactionary positions because the liberal approach does not definitively invalidate reactionary views.

[–] CharlieTheOctopus@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago

I disagree. Maybe liberals misinterpret standpoint theory but its foundationally solid.

[–] towhee@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

At least in America, which imports the reactionary losing/wealthy side of every socialist revolution around the world, standpoint theory is guaranteed to get you a "bomb every country under the sun my Venezuelan friend approves of this" perspective. Partly this is because a lot of Americans think all immigrants are impoverished instead of having to be pretty well-off to get here (excepting border-jumpers or refugees). I know some second- and third-gen immigrants that even play up this perception. Except I've been to their families' houses lol

[–] MiraculousMM@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Based on the wikipedia definition it sounds a lot like intersectionalism but not fully developed?

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

During the lifetime of great revolutionaries, the oppressing classes constantly hounded them, received their theories with the most savage malice, the most furious hatred and the most unscrupulous campaigns of lies and slander. After their death, attempts are made to convert them into harmless icons, to canonize them, so to say, and to hallow their names to a certain extent for the “consolation” of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter, while at the same time robbing the revolutionary theory of its substance, blunting its revolutionary edge and vulgarizing it.

-Lenin

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Black History Month was a Reaganite invention.

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, in 1986 IIRC. Communists and always being right!

Let's water down all these revolutionaries, if we create a platform to discuss what they did, we can control how extreme their actual views were.

I feel like Lenin and Marx discussed like ever possible event that can and would occur in the future lol

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

I've gotten at least a few people to read Lenin from that quote alone. They don't call it the immortal science for nothing.

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

Just sectionalism then.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago