Like how did they all get fucking caught? Weren't they watching?

No, they were busy making tiktoks you antisemite!

Frothing at the mouth with demand for Muslims to be genocided across the globe.

Except for China where harmful and dangerous religious extremism is supposed to be tolerated and jobs programs+education are actually ebil CCP plots to eliminate Muslims (Muslims in China have the second highest birthrate of any census group, second only to Tibetans)

Very surprised that the filth on /r/worldnews, who love to talk about “human shields” in Gaza, have precisely zero questions about israel stationing women on the outskirts of Gaza to send warnings about attacks that the IOF completely ignore

What did they post?

I went there and it was really weird. Like I've heard r/worldnews is a fucked sub but it really felt like all the comments seemed like they were from another planet. Everyone was acting like a) these weren't soldiers for an occupying army and b) that something especially brutal is being done to them. Like if IDF soldiers aren't legitimate targets then you're really giving up the game here.

They're going to keep baying about all of this until Palestine is gone, then 20 years from now they'll be talking about how they knew all along that it was fabricated lies.

Liberals are always on the right side of history once it is politically acceptable.

They probably see themselves as knights lol. Meanwhile irl everyone would be repulsed by them. Guess everyone needs a fantasy to stay happy.

Link please!

Hey compost is useful at least

I’ll kindly ask that you remove this comment so I don’t have to report it

(Thank you for changing the original comment!)

هي إل صبايا هي إل همج

“hay il sabaya hay il hamaj”

“Sabaya” is essentially referring to them as young female captives of war. So in the context of the video posted, they are referring to the IOF soldiers as literal “Young female prisoners of war.” They also call them “hamaj” which could mean “barbarians” or “savages”

So what is happening is that Zionists are intentionally misinterpreting their words. The term reached western media a few years ago when Isis was terrorizing the Yazidis, but Isis is notably not Hamas and when Isis used the word they used it to mean young female slaves,

I will attempt an English example of a similar way to misconstrue a word like this. I think the following is a decent approximation on how the meaning of a word can vary drastically given context but not be incorrect to use in any of these contexts:

“He’s mine for the next 30 minutes.”

Meaning:

You will have physical, slave-like ownership over him for the next 30 minutes

You and him will be sharing time on a task together for the next 30 minutes

You will have his attention for the next 30 minutes

You will be alone participating on the same task for the next 30 minutes

You will be his sole director of activity for the next 30 minutes

And so on and so on. There are so many ways to interpret the word “mine” in this sentence that the context is extremely important. The fact that the women in the video are called savages/barbarians says pretty much everything it needs to: they are prisoners of war. There’s not necessarily any mention of anything sexual, though somebody acting in bad faith could imply that it was, just like in my example above.