666
There should really be a 24/7 protest in front of Cannon's residence - the continued stalling is a corruption of justice.
Cannon should be charged with obstruction.
Cannon should be fired out of a cannon. Into the sun.
Even if it were fired from space, a cannon large enough to fire a Cannon projectile would need to have a muzzle velocity of at least 1467 ft/sec to offset Earth's orbital speed and begin the fall towards the Sun. While modern high velocity cannons can far exceed that for small solid projectiles, we're talking about firing a federal judge-shaped fleshy mass. Even if such a Cannon cannon were to be constructed, it is highly likely that, upon firing, its passenger would simply be turned into a non-federal judge shaped (and decidedly more juicy) fleshy mass due to the acceleration forces.
I'm ok with that result.
I don't believe you. I think it could work just fine, and it should be tested to get to the bottom of this once and for all.
What if we're a bit fast and loose with the Cannon cannon, and we make it more of a rail gun. We should be able to make it long enough to accelerate the Cannon projectile to sufficient speeds without liquefying the contents like you would from the instantaneous acceleration from the Cannon cannon.
I’m ok with this.
Dude I saw star trek generations it was just this silly little rocket and it only took 10 seconds to reach the sun
try it for science or something
You had me at "something."
load more comments
(9 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
Once again, if literally any one else on this planet were caught with that much top secret material without proper authorization they’d be in jail for the rest of their lives.
Only if you’re poor.
Who cares about being caught with it? He was literally handing it out as a pay to play situation. That Aussie billionaire paid bank and got top fucking secret US nuclear arsenal information and that dude blabbed to others immediately, even on the car ride leaving MAL.
Yeah, instead, based on polling, we will just elect him president. Every month we get closer to the election, the better Trump's polling numbers get.
So, figure out what to do when he's president, because if you're someone who would like to bet serious money on the election, the smart money is on Trump.
Welcome to 2025.
So, we doing the same thing again? Rattle our sabers loudly and express our dissatisfaction until a corrupt judge puts it to rest and the felon carries on as usual?
☝️ This one Americas.
USA! USA!
No, we cry about the FBI’s standard verbiage for raids (the same used for MAL raid) and frame it as a literal assassination plot to muddy the waters after Trump’s lawyer told the Supreme Court that Trump could kill rivals with seal team 6 and also at the NRA speech recently in which Trump talked about executing Biden
Oh I almost forgot, Newsweek will post about how this is bad for Biden and platform all of trumps lies in the meantime
Ahh shit… yeah same thing again
load more comments
(1 replies)
Al Capone was originally jailed for tax evasion. 45th would be jailed for being greedy and not giving up papers when even the first batch was discovered, cementing his intent. Both are criminals, but only one is a federal case level moron.
Donald also did some big tax evasion. Would be cool if he could be jailed for any of the numerous crimes he has done.
It'd be funny if it wasn't so frustrating.
“the crime-fraud exception pierces the attorney-client privilege even when the attorney is an unknowing tool of his client.”
Huh. An unknowing tool, you say.
Another term is “useful idiot”
The proposed evidence for their plausible deniability is being stupid enough to work for Trump.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Can they just file a new set of charges and hope for a different Judge?
load more comments
(13 replies)
Was the bedroom not included in the original search warrant?
Didn't read the article, huh
What's an article?
When water freezes coming off a roof
That's an "icicle". An article is a two wheeled pedal powered vehicle.
load more comments
(5 replies)
He always liked to toss off to the Kim Jong Un dossier, it was so weird.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
666 points (99.3% liked)
politics
19096 readers
1159 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS